A Trial to Compare Two Methods of Obtaining Tissue for Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis Namely the Conventional Method or the Ultrasound Guided Method

July 6, 2015 updated by: Dr. Ashesh Dhungana, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

Diagnostic Utility of EBUS-TBNA Versus Conventional TBNA With Rapid on Site Evaluation in the Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis: a Randomised Study

This trial compares the yield of cTBNA (conventional Transbronchial Needle Aspiration) versus the EBUS-TBNA (Endobronchial Ultrasound guided TBNA) for obtaining cytology when they are combined with endobronchial biopsy and transbronchial lung biopsy and rapid onsite examination (ROSE) of the obtained smears in the diagnosis of suspected sarcoidosis patients visiting our hospital for evaluation of mediastinal lymphadenopathy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is investigator initiated, prospective, unblinded randomized study comparing conventional TBNA with EBUS-TBNA for obtaining tissue samples from mediastinal lymph nodes for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis when combined with transbronchial lung biopsy and endobronchial biopsy. It will be conducted on 80 consecutive patients with suspected sarcoidosis presenting to Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Sleep Disorders in AIIMS (All India Institute of Medical Sciences), New Delhi. This study will help to know whether EBUS (Endobronchial Ultrasound guided) or conventional TBNA is better for obtaining tissue samples from mediastinal lymph nodes for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. It will also help to know the value of adding rapid onsite evaluation of the cytology smears to both the procedures. It will also help to determine the overall yield of different procedures when they are combined for obtaining tissue samples for a diagnosis of sarcoidosis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Delhi
      • New Delhi, Delhi, India, 110016
        • Recruiting
        • All India Institute of Medical Sciences
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ashesh Dhungana, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Randeep Guleria, DM

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years and suspected Stage 1 (mediastinal or hilar Lymphadenopathy (LAP)) or Stage 2 ( LAP and parenchymal abnormalities) sarcoidosis
  • Significant mediastinal LAP (Short Axis Diameter more than 10mm)
  • Lymph Node (LN) enlargement in station 4, 7, 10 or 11 and CT chest findings consistent with sarcoidosis.
  • With or without supportive evidence of sarcoidosis - hypercalcemia, calciuria, raised ACE levels or restriction/obstruction on Pulmonary Function Tests (PFT).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Obvious other organ involvement with possibility to confirm granuloma with minimally invasive diagnostic procedure (Skin biopsy, superficial lymph nodes, Lofgren's Syndrome)
  • Sarcoidosis Stage 3 and 4
  • Mediastinal Nodes less than 10 mm in short axis diameter
  • Absence of right paratracheal and subcarinal Lymph node enlargement more than 1 cm in short axis diameter
  • Those who received empiric Steroid for >2 weeks in preceding 3 months
  • Contraindication to bronchoscopy and TBNA (Coagulopathy, Hypoxemia)
  • Unwilling to give consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: cTBNA without ROSE
Patients who will undergo conventional TBNA without ROSE + Endobronchial biopsy + Transbronchial Lung Biopsy
Patients will undergo conventional TBNA and endobronchial biopsy and transbronchial lung biopsy
Other: cTBNA with ROSE
Patients who will undergo conventional TBNA with ROSE + Endobronchial biopsy + Transbronchial Lung Biopsy
Patients will undergo conventional TBNA with rapid on site evaluation of cytology smear and endobronchial biopsy and transbronchial lung biopsy
Other: EBUS-TBNA without ROSE
Patients who will undergo EBUS-TBNA without ROSE + Endobronchial biopsy + Transbronchial Lung Biopsy
Patients will undergo EBUS-TBNA and endobronchial biopsy and transbronchial lung biopsy
Other: EBUS-TBNA with ROSE
Patients who will undergo EBUS-TBNA with ROSE + Endobronchial biopsy + Transbronchial Lung Biopsy
Patients will undergo EBUS-TBNA with rapid onsite evaluation of cytology smear and endobronchial biopsy and transbronchial lung biopsy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic Yield of Conventional TBNA vs EBUS TBNA with or without ROSE
Time Frame: 6 months
Diagnostic Yield is defined as the number of patients with presence of non caseating granuloma on cytology smear divided by total number of sarcoidosis patient expressed as percentage
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Yield of EBUS-TBNA in Conventional TBNA with or without ROSE negative patients
Time Frame: 6 months
Yield is defined as the number of patients with presence of non caseating granuloma on cytology smear divided by total number of sarcoidosis patient expressed as percentage
6 months
Sensitivity of conventional TBNA to detect Non Caseating Granuloma for the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Sensitivity of conventional TBNA when combined with ROSE to detect Non Caseating Granuloma for the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA to detect Non Caseating Granuloma for the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA when combined with ROSE to detect Non Caseating Granuloma for the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Specificity of conventional TBNA to detect Non Caseating Granuloma for the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Specificity of conventional TBNA when combined with ROSE to detect Non Caseating Granuloma for the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Specificity of EBUS-TBNA to detect Non Caseating Granuloma for the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Specificity of EBUS-TBNA when combined with ROSE to detect Non Caseating Granuloma for the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Positive predictive value of conventional TBNA to detect Non Caseating Granuloma for the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Positive predictive value of conventional TBNA when combined with ROSE to detect Non Caseating Granuloma for the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Positive predictive value of EBUS-TBNA to detect Non Caseating Granuloma for the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Positive predictive value of EBUS-TBNA when combined with ROSE to detect Non Caseating Granuloma for the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Negative predictive value of conventional TBNA in the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Negative predictive value of conventional TBNA when combined with ROSE in the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Negative predictive value of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Negative predictive value of EBUS-TBNA when combined with ROSE in the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Sensitivity of endobronchial biopsy to detect Non Caseating Granuloma for the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Specificity of endobronchial biopsy to detect Non Caseating Granuloma for the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Positive predictive value of endobronchial biopsy to detect Non Caseating Granuloma for the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Negative predictive value of endobronchial biopsy in the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Sensitivity of transbronchial lung biopsy to detect Non Caseating Granuloma for the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Specificity of transbronchial lung biopsy to detect Non Caseating Granuloma for the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Positive predictive value of transbronchial lung biopsy to detect Non Caseating Granuloma for the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Negative predictive value of transbronchial lung biopsy in the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ashesh Dhungana, MD, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 16, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 7, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2015

Last Verified

June 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DM Thesis

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sarcoidosis

Clinical Trials on cTBNA without ROSE

3
Subscribe