Amnion Membrane Powder Mohs Study

June 25, 2026 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

A Phase I Study of Human Amnion Membrane Powder for Enhanced Wound Healing of Mohs Surgery Wound Sites

The purpose of this research study is to test the safety of the amnion membrane powder to see if it improves wound healing in patients undergoing Mohs surgery on the scalp.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The primary objective of this prospective, non-randomized, controlled study is to assess the safety of the human amnion membrane powder for enhanced wound healing properties in patients undergoing Mohs surgery resulting in full thickness wounds. The secondary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of the product relative to the standard of care treatment in a control cohort of subjects. The treatment site will be the wound created by the Mohs surgery in the treatment group. The proposed sterilized product is composed of lyophilized, gamma-irradiated powder made from amniotic membrane for topical application with the purpose of enhanced wound healing.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The subject requires Mohs surgery on the scalp, with the resulting wound extending to the subgalea (all subcutaneous fat removed) and a surface area of at least 4cm2.
  • The subject is willing to complete all follow-up evaluations required by the study protocol.
  • The subject is to abstain from any other covering or treatment of the wound(s) for the duration of the study unless otherwise directed by the study surgeon or their surrogate
  • The subject agrees to abstain from enrollment in any other interventional clinical trial for the duration of the study.
  • The subject and/or guardian is/are able to read and understand instructions and give informed, voluntary, written consent.
  • The subject is able and willing to follow the protocol requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The subject's wound site is smaller than 4cm2.
  • The subject's wound site does not extend to the subgalea.
  • The subject has invasive melanoma or high-risk squamous cell carcinoma (defined by poor differentiation, presence of perineural invasion) in which the standard of care is to be referred for adjuvant radiation oncology
  • The subject has a microbiologically proven pre-existing local or systemic bacterial infection.
  • The subject has been receiving a systemic antibiotic for more than 48 hours prior to grafting.
  • Unstable cardiac disorders within the past 6 months including angina, abnormal ECG, history of cardiac arrest, surgery and/or other interventional procedure that would preclude the indicated procedure.
  • Hepatic disease or altered liver function as defined by ALT or AST value > 3 times the upper limit of normal and/or T. Bilirubin >1.5 mg/dL at screening.
  • Renal disease or altered renal function as defined by serum creatinine > 2 mg/dL at screening, or ESRD.
  • Hemoglobin <10.0 or >19.0 g/dL
  • Untreated coagulopathy or platelet disorder, or INR > 1.6, PTT > 38 sec; PLT < 50,000 at screening.
  • The subject is known to have a pre-existing, chronic condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may interfere with complete re-epithelialization including but not limited to untreated malignancy, uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c >10), autoimmune disease or other immunocompromised diseases, hematological diseases, peripheral artery diseases, and /or malnourishment with an albumin < 2.5.
  • The subject currently uses illicit substances or has drug or alcohol dependency.
  • The subject is unable to follow the protocol.
  • The subject is taking medication known to have an effect on wound healing or skin pigmentation within 30 days prior to surgery (e.g. corticosteroids, retinoids etc.)
  • The subject has a known hypersensitivity to Compound Sodium Lactate for Irrigation (Hartmann's) solution.
  • The subject is pregnant or lactating or intends to become pregnant during the study.
  • The subject has other concurrent conditions that in the opinion of the investigator may compromise patient safety or study objectives.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Amnion Membrane Powder
amnion membrane power applied during MOHS scalp surgery
amnion membrane power dose of 0.26 mg/mm3 applied during MOHS scalp surgery
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
aquaphor ointment applied during MOHS scalp surgery
aquaphor ointment applied during MOHS scalp surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants with Infection
Time Frame: Through week 16
Number of participants that developed a wound infection
Through week 16
Number of Participants with Allergic Reaction
Time Frame: Through week 16
Number of participants with an allergic reaction to the intervention
Through week 16
Number of Treatment-Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: Through week 16
Number of treatment-related adverse events
Through week 16
Number of Unscheduled Visits for Wound Bleeding
Time Frame: Through week 16
Number of participants that had an unscheduled visit for wound bleeding
Through week 16
Pain Score
Time Frame: Baseline
Participants asked rate their pain on a scale of 1-10 with 10 being worst pain.
Baseline
Pain Score
Time Frame: Week 1
Participants asked rate their pain on a scale of 1-10 with 10 being worst pain.
Week 1
Pain Score
Time Frame: Week 2
Participants asked rate their pain on a scale of 1-10 with 10 being worst pain.
Week 2
Pain Score
Time Frame: Week 3
Participants asked rate their pain on a scale of 1-10 with 10 being worst pain.
Week 3
Pain Score
Time Frame: Week 4
Participants asked rate their pain on a scale of 1-10 with 10 being worst pain.
Week 4
Pain Score
Time Frame: Week 5
Participants asked rate their pain on a scale of 1-10 with 10 being worst pain.
Week 5
Pain Score
Time Frame: Week 6
Participants asked rate their pain on a scale of 1-10 with 10 being worst pain.
Week 6
Pain Score
Time Frame: Week 7
Participants asked rate their pain on a scale of 1-10 with 10 being worst pain.
Week 7
Pain Score
Time Frame: Week 8
Participants asked rate their pain on a scale of 1-10 with 10 being worst pain.
Week 8
Pain Score
Time Frame: Week 12
Participants asked rate their pain on a scale of 1-10 with 10 being worst pain.
Week 12
Pain Score
Time Frame: Week 16
Participants asked rate their pain on a scale of 1-10 with 10 being worst pain.
Week 16

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time Until Wound Closure
Time Frame: Through week 16
Number of days until wound was completely closed
Through week 16
Time Until of Wound Closure
Time Frame: Through week 16
Number of days until wound was fully sealed
Through week 16
Percentage of Re-epithelialization
Time Frame: Week 1, week 4, week 8, week 12, week 16
Percentage of the wound with re-epithelialization
Week 1, week 4, week 8, week 12, week 16

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christine Ahn, MD, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wound Heal

Clinical Trials on Amnion Membrane Powder

3
Subscribe