Fascial Abdominal Closure Evaluation (FACE)

July 1, 2026 updated by: Dimitrios Zouzoulas, Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki

A Randomized Trial of Duramesh Versus PDS Loop Suture for Midline Incision Fascial Abdominal Closure Evaluation in Patients With Gynecological Malignancies

FACE (Fascial Abdominal Closure Evaluation) Trial is a prospective, single center, open-label, randomized trial of Duramesh versus PDS loop suture for midline incision fascial abdominal closure evaluation in patients with gynecological malignancies

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Incisional hernias after midline incisions are estimated are estimated around 10-20%, which many times results in further surgical procedures. Many techniques with different sutures have been proposed of the years for fascial closure. PDS suture offers longer dissolution time, lower short-term tensile strength and lower knot security, however the highest quality data available for gynecological malignancies are from 30 years ago. On the other hand, the use of mesh suture (Duramesh) has been proposed as an alternative, in order to reduce postoperative hernias and abdominal wall complication rates. A recent systematic review on Duramesh shows promising results with a median incisional hernia occurrence of 3.4%, but the authors highlight the need for high-quality randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up to evaluate the clinical benefits of Duramesh.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Midline laparotomies for gynecological malignancies
  • Age 18 - 85 years old
  • ECOG Performance status: 0 - 2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Albumin < 3.5 g/dL
  • Previous history of any type of hernia
  • Previous midline incision (via laparotomy)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ARM A: Control Arm
(Ethicon) PDS II 1-0 double loop suture material with a 48mm needle
(Ethicon) PDS II 1-0 double loop suture with a 48 mm needle is a slowly absorbable, synthetic monofilament polydioxanone suture designed to provide prolonged tensile support for fascial and other soft-tissue closure where extended wound support is desired
Experimental: ARM B: Intervention Arm
Duramesh suture with a 48mm needle
Duramesh is a non-absorbable polypropylene "mesh suture": a suture that is built like a tiny mesh tube so it behaves both as a suture and as a small piece of mesh to strengthen tissue closure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of incisional hernia
Time Frame: Up to 12 months after randomization
Clinical or radiological detected
Up to 12 months after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of wound dehiscence
Time Frame: Up to 1 month after randomization
Up to 1 month after randomization
Incidence of wound infection
Time Frame: Up to 1 months after randomization
Up to 1 months after randomization
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for wound pain
Time Frame: Fifth postoperative day after randomization
Wound pain will be assessed with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The minimum value is 0 (no pain) and the maximum value is 10 (Pain as bad as it could possibly be). The VAS line is 10cm long. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Fifth postoperative day after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dimitrios Tsolakidis, Dr. Prof., Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Sharing of IPD only after contact with the principal investigator for the synthesis of future studies

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hernia Incisional

Clinical Trials on (Ethicon) PDS II 1-0 double loop

3
Subscribe