Double Mesh Modification of Incisional Hernia Can be Effective Without Severe Local Complications

November 19, 2019 updated by: Hazem Nour Abdellatif, Zagazig University

Evaluation of Double Mesh Modification of Chevrel's Technique in Management of Midline Incisional Hernia

22 patients of incisional hernia underwent treatment by double mesh modification of the original Chevrel's technique the primary outcome was recurrence, skin necrosis secondery out come was pain hematoma seroma

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a clinical trial carried out on 22 patients with midline incisional hernia, using the double mesh modification of Chevrel's technique, all the procedures were performed by the same group of surgeons.

The exclusion criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 3, and 4, inflammatory bowel disease, urgent setting, recurrences and previous abdominal neoplasms with high risk of local recurrence (rectal cancer). All patients were informed and consented before recruitment in the study All patients received an intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis with subcutaneous administration of fractionated heparin before surgery when indicated.

Surgical technique All patients were operated on with the double mesh modification of Chevrel's technique. The previous scar was excised then, dissection of the subcutaneous space was performed deep to the neck of the hernia, not wider than 1cm from the edges of the defect, then the sac was opened and resected, the defect size was measured, the skin and subcutaneous tissue was dissected off the anterior rectus sheath only allowing dissection of an anterior rectus sheath flap just sufficient to close the defect without tension After that a bilateral longitudinal incisions was done on the anterior surface of the anterior rectus sheath and a medial anterior rectus sheath flap was dissected off the rectus abdominis muscle, both recti muscles was dissected off the posterior rectus sheath opening the retrorectus space, each of the medial anterior rectus sheath flaps was sutured to that of the other side with slowly absorbed sutures closing the defect without any tension and reforming the posterior rectus sheath

A sizable prolene mesh was fixed with prolene sutures in the retrorectus space spreading between lateral ends of the space and tunneled up 4 cm in the retrorectus space far from vertical edges of the defect,Then the anterior rectus sheath was closed using a prolene mesh tailored to the size of the space between the lateral flaps of both sides and sutured to the edges of the lateral flaps with interrupted non absorbable sutures.

suction drain is left in site, subcutaneous tissue was closed with Vicryl (3\0) , skin was closed with prolene (3\0), drain was removed when the amount of drainage is below 30 ml \ day .

Data of the patients as demographic data, preoperative investigations, operative findings as defect size, operative time, early postoperative data as viability of skin flaps, wound infection, seroma and early hernia recurrence, late postoperative data as hernia recurrence. All data were collected, properly presented and analyzed using the SPSS package 22.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sharqya
      • Zagazig, Sharqya, Egypt, 44519
        • Zagazig Faculty of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• adult with midline incisional hernia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (ASA) 3, and 4,
  • inflammatory bowel disease,
  • urgent setting,
  • recurrences and previous abdominal neoplasms with high risk of local recurrence (rectal cancer).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: modified chevrel technique
hernioplasty done with double mesh modification of chevrels technique
hernioplasty done by modification of the chevrel's technique , no dissection further than 1 cm of the midline laterally, the medial flaps of the anterior rectus sheath is dissected of the anterior surface of the rectus abdominis muscle and sutured together reforming the posterior rectus sheath , one polypropylene mesh was fixed over the posterior rectus sheath and the other was tailored to raw area of the rectis abdominis muscle and sutured to the lateral free edges of the anterior rectus sheath

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
recurrence of the hernia
Time Frame: 2 years
the incisional hernia recurs back measured by clinical examination or abdominal CT
2 years
necrosis of the edges of the wound
Time Frame: 1 week
gangrene of the medial edges of the midline incision after dissection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue off the rectus sheath measured by clinical examination
1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
seroma
Time Frame: 1 week
presence of serous fluid collection in the subcutaneous space measured by superficial probe ultrasound examination
1 week
hematoma
Time Frame: 1 week
blood collection around the mesh prosthesis measured by superficial probe ultrasound examination
1 week
abdominal wall pain
Time Frame: 1 year
pain related to the surgical wound or the mesh prosthesis fixation sutures , measured by visual analogue scale
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 30, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • modified chevrel technique

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Incisional Hernia of Midline of Abdomen

Clinical Trials on double mesh hernioplasty with modified chevrel's technique

3
Subscribe