Use of Mosquito Net Mesh for Ventral Hernia Repair

November 7, 2017 updated by: David Esmer, Hospital Central "Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto"

Use of Mosquito Net Mesh in Comparison With Polypropylene Mesh for Ventral Hernia Repair.

It´s a pilot study, randomized, realized in the Central Hospital "Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto", SLP, Mexico.

Hypothesis:

The polyethylene mesh is secure in open ventral repair.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

It´s a pilot study, randomized, realized in the Central Hospital "Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto", SLP, Mexico.

The simple size for pilot study was been calculated in 20 patients, according with Browne for not knowing the variability of the treatment. 10 patients in the group of Polypropylene mesh (Prolene ®), braided monofilament thread, macropore, weight of 108.1 g/m2, fibres diameter of 0.53 mm, tensile force of 156.6 N/cm, with a pore of 1.6 mm2, in different size of 15 x 15 cm, 20 x 20 cm and 30 x 30 cm, and 10 patients in the group of mesh of PEBD (mosquito net), braided monofilament thread, macropore, ,weight of 53.7 g/m2, fibers diameter of 0.48 mm, tensile force of 42.7 N/cm and pore of 1.8 mm2, in different size 15 x 15 cm, 20 x 20 cm and 30x 30 cm donated by Dr. Ravindranath R. Tongaonkar. The sterilization were done in ethylene oxide.

The randomisation for allocation the type of mesh for each patient was realized with numbers generated by computer with the program R version 3.0.2 with the simple function.

The statistical analysis was carried out by the programs: JMP 8 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and R 2.15.1 23.

The ventral hernia repair were carried out with standardized technique, placed the mesh int the preperitoneal or retromuscular space fixing with 2-0 poplypropylene suture and le fe active-close drainage, 30 minutes before the incision, prophylactic antibiotic 1gm of cefalotin was administered, in both groups, the patient was discharge at the first postoperatory day with drainage and retired at the first review at 1 week and recited at one, three, six and twelve months for reviewer.

The descriptive analysis of categorical variables was expressed with frequencies and percentages; the numerical ones with normal distribution in averages and standard deviation, the variables with distribution not normal with medians and status (maximum and minimal values). The values of p<0.05 were considered to be significant.

This study was evaluated and accepted by the Committee of Investigation and the Committee of Ethics, with number of record 42-17.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All the patients with primary or incisional elective ventral hernia repair with mesh were included, with ASA I,II and III between 18 and 75 years, of any sex, and that they accepted to take part in the protocol and signed the informed assent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • We excluded patients with incarcerated, strangulated hernia, signs of intestinal obstruction, consumption of anticoagulants, IMC >35, parastomal hernias, hernia repair with intestinal reconnections at the same procedure or presented infection in abdominal wall.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: mosquito net mesh
The open ventral hernia repair were carried out with rives technique, followed by the placement of the mosquito net mesh, and left active-close drainage, 30 minutes before the incisión, prophylactic antibiotic 1gm of cefalotin was administered.
Open ventral hernia repair followed by the placement of the mesh.
Placement of active-close drainage in surgical site.
Prophylactic antibiotic 1gm of cefalotin was administered 30 minutes before the incisión.
Other Names:
  • Prevention
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: prolene mesh
The open ventral hernia repair were carried out with rives technique, followed by the placement of the prolene mesh, and left active-close drainage, 30 minutes before the incisión, prophylactic antibiotic 1gm of cefalotin was administered.
Open ventral hernia repair followed by the placement of the mesh.
Placement of active-close drainage in surgical site.
Prophylactic antibiotic 1gm of cefalotin was administered 30 minutes before the incisión.
Other Names:
  • Prevention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Recurrence
Time Frame: One year
Rate of Reappearance of a ventral hernia post procedure after a year.
One year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Infection
Time Frame: first week, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month and One year
Number of participants with open ventral hernia repair that have adverse events as infection post procedure determined by clinical, leukocytosis and positive bacterial culture.
first week, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month and One year
Seroma
Time Frame: first week, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month and One year
A seroma is a collection of fluid that builds up under the surface of your skin.
first week, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month and One year
length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Days
the average number of days that patients spend in hospital.
Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jesus M Sanchez, MD, Universidad Autonoma de San Luis Potosí

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 30, 2017

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 30, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 9, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

As a preliminary study, its not finish yet.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hernia, Ventral

Clinical Trials on Rives technique

3
Subscribe