Digital vs. Conventional Indirect Bonding.

Comparison of Indirect Bonding of Orthodontic Brackets Using Digital Versus Conventional Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Bonding Time and Bracket Failure

This randomized split-mouth clinical trial will compare digital and conventional indirect bonding techniques for fixed orthodontic bracket placement in adolescent patients requiring treatment in both dental arches.

Each participant will receive both bonding techniques, with allocation of the digital and conventional indirect bonding procedures to the upper or lower arch determined by randomization. The study will evaluate the time required to complete bracket bonding procedures and the early clinical performance of the two techniques, assessed by bracket failure within the first month after appliance placement.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Indirect bonding has been proposed as an alternative to direct bonding for the placement of orthodontic brackets, with potential advantages in terms of clinical efficiency, bracket positioning, and patient comfort. In recent years, computer-aided three-dimensional design and manufacturing methods have enabled the production of digital transfer trays for indirect bonding, offering a potentially more standardized workflow compared with conventional laboratory-based procedures.

This randomized split-mouth clinical trial will compare digital and conventional indirect bonding techniques in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment in both the upper and lower arches. Each participant will receive both techniques, with the allocation of the digital and conventional bonding procedures to the upper or lower arch determined by randomization.

In the digital indirect bonding procedure, transfer trays will be produced using a digital workflow and brackets will be bonded using a pre-coated adhesive system. In the conventional indirect bonding procedure, transfer trays will be produced using a standard laboratory workflow and brackets will be bonded using a conventional orthodontic adhesive system.

The study will assess the procedural efficiency of the two techniques by recording the time required to complete the bracket bonding procedure. Early clinical performance will be evaluated by recording bracket failures during the first month of orthodontic treatment. All procedures and follow-up assessments will be performed in a clinical orthodontic setting.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Florence, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • Orthodontic Clinic, Division of Dentistry, Careggi University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 12 to 18 years requiring fixed orthodontic treatment on both upper and lower arches
  • Presence of full permanent dentition, including erupted second molars

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of dental anomalies in number (supernumerary or missing teeth) in either arch
  • Orthodontic treatment plans involving tooth extractions in either arch
  • Nickel allergy
  • History of cleft lip and/or palate
  • Craniofacial syndromes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Digital indirect bonding in the upper arch and conventional indirect bonding in the lower arch
Participants assigned to this arm will receive digital indirect bonding in the upper arch and conventional indirect bonding in the lower arch.
Fixed orthodontic appliance will be bonded using a digital indirect bonding technique
Fixed orthodontic appliance will be bonded using a conventional indirect bonding technique
Active Comparator: Conventional indirect bonding in the upper arch and digital indirect bonding in the lower arch
Participants assigned to this arm will receive conventional indirect bonding in the upper arch and digital indirect bonding in the lower arch.
Fixed orthodontic appliance will be bonded using a digital indirect bonding technique
Fixed orthodontic appliance will be bonded using a conventional indirect bonding technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time required to complete bracket bonding procedures, measured in minutes
Time Frame: During procedure (from the beginning of bracket bonding to completion of bracket placement)
The time required to complete the bracket bonding procedure will be measured in minutes for each participant, from the beginning of the bonding procedure to completion of bracket placement, using the assigned adhesive system.
During procedure (from the beginning of bracket bonding to completion of bracket placement)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bracket failure rate within the first month of orthodontic treatment assessed by clinical examination
Time Frame: 1 month after placement of the fixed orthodontic appliance
Bracket failure will be assessed by clinical examination and recorded as the number of brackets detached from the tooth surface within the first month after placement of the fixed orthodontic appliance.
1 month after placement of the fixed orthodontic appliance

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 3, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 20, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 24, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LF17

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malocclusion

Clinical Trials on digital indirect bonding technique

3
Subscribe