- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07705633
Evaluation of Two Pit and Fissure Sealants Treated by Two Remineralizing Agents in Resin Restorations
Clinical Evaluation of Two Pit and Fissure Sealants Treated by Two Remineralizing Agents in Preventive Resin Restorations
The study aimed to assess the clinical evaluation of two different types of pit and fissure sealants after treating with two different remineralizing agents in preventive resin restorations.
Primary objectives:
Assessment of retention rate and marginal integrity of two types of pit and fissure sealants when using two types of remeneralizing agents using Ryge's criteria and Simonsen's criteria.
Secondary objectives:
Assessment of stability of results after 3, 6 and 9months.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
- Device: Group 1 :Teeth treated with Fisseal, Promedica Dental Material GmbH after treating with Biflourid
- Device: Group 2 :Teeth treated with Fisseal, Promedica Dental Material GmbH after treating with MI Paste
- Device: Group 3 : Teeth treated with prevent seal, Itena, North America after treating with Biflourid
- Device: Group 4 : Teeth treated with prevent seal, Itena, North America after treating with MI Paste
Detailed Description
Dental caries is one of the most common intraoral diseases, with serious consequences for both the individual patient and for the public in terms of medical, social, and economic concerns. The individual patient suffers from pain, dysfunction of the oral system, and reduced quality of life.
Caries predominantly attack the occlusal surfaces of premolars and molars during their eruption . On the other hand, smooth surface caries have shown a significant decline, likely a result of increased worldwide access to fluoride . In previous reports, an incomplete post-eruptive maturation , and the presence of narrow and deep fissures were blamed for the increased caries susceptibility of occlusal surfaces . It has been more than 40 years since the pit and fissure sealants were first used clinically. During this time, pit and fissure sealants have been shown to be effective in reducing the risk of occlusal caries . A study aimed to evaluate the effect of the previous application of a casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate paste (MI Paste, MI) and adhesive systems on the bond durability of a fissure sealant. Ninety-eight enamel blocks were obtained from proximal surfaces of erupted third molars.
Anthor study evaluated the effect of treating the enamel with topical fluoride gel prior to acid etching on sealant retention clinically (Part I) and in vitro (Part II). Results showed no statistically significant differences between the test and control groups either clinically or in vitro. It is concluded that topical fluoride application prior to acid etching does not have a deleterious effect on sealant retention .
The study aimed to assess the clinical evaluation of two different types of pit and fissure sealants after treating with two different remineralizing agents in preventive resin restorations.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Suez, Egypt
- Suez Canal University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Absence of restorations or prior sealants on the teeth under study.
- Patients have simple occlusal spot caries lesions
- Age group 15 - 40 years.
- Ability to return for periodic follow-up
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with high DMFS.
- Any fixed orthodontic appliances.
- Smoking habit.
- Pregnant and lactating mothers
- Symptoms of dental pain
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Fisseal, Promedica Dental Material GmbH with Biflourid 10 Group
Teeth treated with Fisseal, Promedica Dental Material GmbH after treating with Biflourid 10, Voco, Germany
|
Teeth treated with Fisseal, Promedica Dental Material GmbH after treating with Biflourid 10, Voco, Germany
|
|
Experimental: Fisseal, Promedica Dental Material GmbH after treating with MI Paste Group
Teeth treated with Fisseal, Promedica Dental Material GmbH after treating with MI Paste, GC AmericaC America
|
Group 2 (G2): Teeth treated with Fisseal, Promedica Dental Material GmbH after treating with MI Paste, GC AmericaC America
|
|
Experimental: prevent seal, Itena, North America after treating with Biflourid Group
Teeth treated with prevent seal, Itena, North America after treating with Biflourid 10, Voco, Germany
|
Group 3 (G3): Teeth treated with prevent seal, Itena, North America after treating with Biflourid 10, Voco, Germany
|
|
Experimental: prevent seal, Itena, North America after treating with MI Paste Group
Teeth treated with prevent seal, Itena, North America after treating with MI Paste, GC AmericaC America
|
Device: Group 4 : Teeth treated with prevent seal, Itena, North America after treating with MI Paste
Group 4 : Teeth treated with prevent seal, Itena, North America after treating with MI Paste
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Retention rate of two types of pit and fissure sealants
Time Frame: After 3 months, 6 months and 9 months
|
Assessment of retention rate of two types of pit and fissure sealants when using two types of remeneralizing agents using Ryge's criteria
|
After 3 months, 6 months and 9 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
marginal integrity assessments
Time Frame: After 3 months, 6 months and 9 months.
|
Assessment of marginal integrity of two types of pit and fissure sealants when using two types of remeneralizing agents using Ryge's criteria
|
After 3 months, 6 months and 9 months.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 376/2021
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Retention
-
Mbarara University of Science and TechnologyUniversity of Calgary; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute; The ELMA... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingVentilation Skills Acquisition and Retention | Ventilation Knowledge Acquisition and Retention
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
King Abdulaziz UniversityCompleted
-
Yafen ZhuCompleted
-
Esraa Salman JasimUniversity of BaghdadRecruiting
-
Dr. Praveen B.HNathajirao G. Halgekar Institute of Dental Sciences & Research centre, Karnataka...Completed
-
Cairo UniversityUnknown
-
HALEONRecruitingDenture RetentionUnited States
-
University of Health Sciences LahoreCompleted