Evaluating Customized Antibiotic Duration (CDA) Strategy in Acute Exacerbations of COPD (CDA)

October 6, 2026 updated by: Fazal Rabbi, Capital Development Authority (CDA)

Evaluating Customized Antibiotic Duration (CDA) Strategy in Acute Exacerbations of COPD: Protocol for Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether a shorter course of antibiotics (7 days) works as well as the usual longer course (14 days) for adults admitted to hospital with a flare-up of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a long-term lung disease. The trial takes place at CDA Hospital Islamabad, Pakistan.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Do patients who take antibiotics for 7 days recover as well by Day 30 as patients who take them for 14 days?
  • Does the shorter course lead to fewer side effects and less antibiotic use, without more treatment failures, relapses or hospital readmissions? Researchers will compare a 7-day antibiotic course with the usual 14-day course to see if the shorter course is just as effective.

Participants will:

  • Be assigned by chance (like flipping a coin) to take antibiotics for either 7 days or 14 days. Their doctor chooses which antibiotic to use.
  • Receive all other usual hospital care for their COPD flare-up.
  • Have check-ups about 3-5 days, 7 days, 14 days and 30 days after joining the trial, in hospital or by telephone, to record their symptoms, any side effects and any return to hospital.

About 560 adults will take part.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Background: Antibiotics are routinely given to adults hospitalised with an acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD). International guidance (GOLD) advises that treatment should normally last about 5 days, but in many hospitals in Pakistan courses of 14 days remain usual practice. Longer courses increase antibiotic exposure, adverse effects and the risk of antimicrobial resistance, yet there is no randomised evidence from Pakistan on whether a shorter course is as effective for hospitalised patients.

Intervention: The experimental arm receives a 7-day systemic antibiotic course and the active comparator arm the conventional 14-day course. The treating physician chooses the agent, dose and route according to institutional practice and available microbiology, so only the planned duration differs between arms. Duration is counted from the first antibiotic dose for the current exacerbation. All other care, including bronchodilators, corticosteroids, oxygen and ventilatory support, follows usual practice in both arms. The intervention was developed through a three-round Delphi consensus process with prescribers before the trial began.

Procedures: Blood and sputum samples are taken at baseline for culture and susceptibility testing; results may guide a change of agent but do not change the allocated duration. Participants are assessed during treatment (Day 3-5), at Day 7, at Day 14 and at Day 30, in hospital or by telephone. Allocation uses a computer-generated sequence with permuted blocks of variable size, concealed through a web-based randomisation system.

Sample size: Assuming 80% clinical success in both arms, a non-inferiority margin of 10 percentage points, a one-sided alpha of 0.025 and 80% power, 252 evaluable participants per arm are required; allowing for 10% attrition, 560 participants will be enrolled.

Analysis: The primary analysis estimates the risk difference in clinical success at Day 30 (7-day minus 14-day) with a two-sided 95% Miettinen-Nurminen confidence interval. Non-inferiority will be concluded only if the lower confidence limit exceeds -10 percentage points in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. Full details are given in the study protocol (version 2.0) and statistical analysis plan (version 1.1).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

560

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Pakistan
      • Islamabad, Pakistan, Pakistan, 44000
        • CDA Hospital Islamabad
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Physician-diagnosed COPD, confirmed by post-bronchodilator spirometry (FEV1/FVC < 0.70) where available, or by documented previous spirometry consistent with COPD.
  • A current acute exacerbation of COPD for which the treating physician judges antibiotic therapy to be necessary, with at least two of the three cardinal symptoms (increased dyspnoea, increased sputum volume, increased sputum purulence).
  • Able and willing to give written informed consent and to follow the study procedures and follow-up schedule.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A documented infection that requires a defined, longer antibiotic course, such as pneumonia with complications, an exacerbation of bronchiectasis, lung abscess or empyema.
  • Need for immediate admission to intensive care or for invasive mechanical ventilation at presentation.
  • Severe immunosuppression, for example neutropenia, active malignancy under chemotherapy, organ transplantation or advanced HIV infection.
  • Suspected or confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis, or another respiratory infection that needs a different antimicrobial approach.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Previous enrolment in this trial, or current participation in another interventional trial in AECOPD.
  • Systemic antibiotic treatment for the current exacerbation started more than 48 hours before randomisation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 7-day antibiotic course

Participants receive systemic antibiotic therapy for a total of 7 days, counted from the first dose for the current exacerbation. The treating physician chooses the antibiotic agent, dose and route; all other care follows usual practice.

Systemic antibiotic therapy is given for a total of 7 days, counted from the first dose for the current exacerbation. The agent, dose and route are chosen by the treating physician according to institutional practice, suspected cause and available microbiology; only the planned duration differs from the comparator.

Active Comparator: 14-day antibiotic course

Participants receive systemic antibiotic therapy for a total of 14 days, counted from the first dose for the current exacerbation, which is the usual practice at the study hospital. The treating physician chooses the antibiotic agent, dose and route; all other care follows usual practice.

Systemic antibiotic therapy given for a total of 14 days, counted from the first dose for the current exacerbation, which is usual practice at the study hospital. The agent, dose and route are chosen by the treating physician according to institutional practice, suspected cause and available microbiology; only the planned duration differs from the experimental arm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Success at Day 30
Time Frame: Day 30 (±3 days) after randomisation

Number and proportion of participants with clinical success at Day 30 (±3 days) after randomisation, compared between arms as a risk difference (7-day minus 14-day) with a non-inferiority margin of -10 percentage points. Clinical success requires all of: (a) resolution or substantial improvement of the exacerbation-related signs and symptoms present at baseline (dyspnoea, sputum volume and sputum purulence), judged by the blinded outcome assessor using predefined criteria, with a reduction of at least 2 points from baseline in the COPD Assessment Test score; (b) no additional or alternative systemic antibiotic for a respiratory indication after the allocated course, and no extension of the course because of lack of improvement; (c) no hospital readmission or emergency department visit for AECOPD; and (d) the participant is alive. Participants who do not meet all four criteria are classified as clinical failures.

Day 30 (±3 days) after randomisation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Success at Day 14
Time Frame: Day 14 (±2 days) after randomisation

Number and proportion of participants with clinical success at Day 14 (±2 days) after randomisation, defined as for the primary outcome, compared between arms as a risk difference.

Day 14 (±2 days) after randomisation
Time to Resolution of Exacerbation Symptoms
Time Frame: From randomisation up to Day 30

Number of days from randomisation to resolution of the exacerbation symptoms present at baseline.

From randomisation up to Day 30
Incidence of Antibiotic-Related Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: From randomisation up to Day 30

Number of participants with at least one adverse event or serious adverse event related to antibiotic treatment.

From randomisation up to Day 30
Treatment Failure
Time Frame: From randomisation up to Day 30

Number of participants with treatment failure, defined as the need for additional or alternative systemic antibiotics because of clinical deterioration or lack of improvement, escalation to non-invasive or invasive ventilation or intensive care after Day 3, or death.

From randomisation up to Day 30
Relapse
Time Frame: From randomisation up to Day 30

Number of participants with a new or worsening exacerbation requiring systemic antibiotics or corticosteroids after initial clinical improvement.

From randomisation up to Day 30
Rehospitalisation for Any Cause and for AECOPD
Time Frame: Within 30 days after randomisation

Number of participants readmitted to hospital, reported separately for any cause and for acute exacerbation of COPD.

Within 30 days after randomisation
All-Cause Mortality
Time Frame: Within 30 days after randomisation

Number of participants who die from any cause.

Within 30 days after randomisation
Total Antibiotic Consumption
Time Frame: From randomisation up to Day 30

Total systemic antibiotic consumption per participant, expressed in defined daily doses (DDD).

From randomisation up to Day 30

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fazal Rabbi, MD, Capital Development Authority (CDA)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 26, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2026

Last Verified

October 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data underlying the published results will be made available to researchers on reasonable request to the corresponding author after publication, subject to institutional and ethical approval.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning after publication of the main trial results, with no fixed end date.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Requests should be sent to the lead author and co-author (faiz@bjmu.edu.cn) with a brief research proposal. Data will be shared after approval of the proposal by the investigators and the relevant institutional review boards, and after a data-sharing agreement has been signed.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe