- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05389410
PICO 7 vs PICO 14 in Revision Hip and Revision Knee Surgery.
Comparison of Surgical Wound Healing and Complications Following Revision Hip and Knee Replacements, Utilising a 7-day Versus 14-day Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) Dressing. A Randomised Controlled Trial.
This is a single-site trial, and it has been designed to compare a revision hip cohort with a revision knee cohort. All consecutive eligible patients, under the care of participating Co-Investigator Orthopaedic Surgeons, are approached for recruitment into the study.
Eligible patients wishing to participate must require either revision hip or revision knee surgery and consent to be randomised to either NPWT PICO dressing for 7-day therapy (PICO 7) or NPWT PICO 14-day therapy (PICO 14).
82 Revision Hips and 82 Revision Knee participants, with 41* of each cohort randomised to either a 7-day or a 14-day NPWT dressing treatment duration period. The 7-day cohort will be treated with PICO7 dressings and pumps, and the 14-day cohort will be treated with PICO14 dressings.
*Randomisation will be stratified, so it will continue until there are at least 41 participants in each cohort.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Although the efficacy of these dressings is well established in promoting wound healing, the duration of application particularly in revision surgeries, where the surgery has been carried out though old scar tissues is however undetermined at present. The few published studies regarding this do show a benefit, however, they do not address the potential issues surrounding late wound breakdown and the duration of the NPWT on the wound 4,5.
Therefore a proposed randomised study to evaluate whether one-week of negative pressure wound therapy is sufficient or whether a two-week therapy duration is warranted.
This will be done by randomising a minimum of 82 patients who are scheduled for revision hip surgery and 82 patients who are scheduled for revision knee surgery into either a "control group" or a "study group".
The 'control group' cohort will receive a NPWT PICO 7 dressing and pump for a period of week, followed by a hydrocolloid dressing or other standard dressing applied thereafter. The 'study group' cohort will receive a NPWT PICO 14 dressing and pump for a period of 2 weeks, with a dressing change at one week. The pump will be paused during the dressing change, restarting it again once the new dressing has been applied and sealed for another week's NPWT.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Julie Steen, BSc. (Hons)
- Phone Number: 01691404210
- Email: julie.steen@nhs.net
Study Locations
-
-
Shropshire
-
Oswestry, Shropshire, United Kingdom, SY10 7AG
- Recruiting
- Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
-
Contact:
- Julie Steen
- Phone Number: 01691404210
- Email: julie.steen@nhs.net
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects must be over the age of 18 years.
- Participants undergoing aseptic revision hip or aseptic revision knee surgery procedure (a single stage revision procedure).
- Participants must be willing and be able to make all the required study visits to be seen by the research team at the Outpatients department at RJAH.
- Participants must be able to follow instructions.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Revisions for infection, where the nature of the infection has a significant influence on the wound healing, discharge, and length of stay.
- Subjects with a history of poor compliance with medical treatment.
- Subjects with contraindications (as per the PICO Instructions for use) or hypersensitivity to the use of the NPWT PICO dressing product or its components e.g.: silicone adhesives, polyurethane films, acrylic adhesives, polyethylene fabrics and super- absorbent powders (polyacrylates) contained within the dressing.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Revision Hip surgery
Participants will be randomised to PICO 7 or PICO 14 intervention.
|
Participant will receive 7 days of NPWT following revision hip or revision knee surgery.
Other Names:
Participant will receive 14 days of NPWT following revision hip or revision knee surgery.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Revision knee surgery
Participants will be randomised to PICO 7 or PICO 14 intervention.
|
Participant will receive 7 days of NPWT following revision hip or revision knee surgery.
Other Names:
Participant will receive 14 days of NPWT following revision hip or revision knee surgery.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The extent of wound exudate graded 1-4. This is measured by the extent of staining on the dressing at 1-week post-surgery (both study and control groups) and 2 weeks post-surgery (study group only).
Time Frame: Within the first 2 weeks post-surgery
|
The extent of wound exudate graded 1-4 (measured by the extent of staining on the dressing) at 1 week and 2 weeks at follow up appointments. Grading of wound exudate levels and the amount of exudate on the coverage of the dressing: Grade 0 None No staining Grade 1 Light < 25% Grade 2 Moderate 25% to 50% Grade 3 Heavy 50% to 75% Grade 4 Overt > 75% |
Within the first 2 weeks post-surgery
|
Late wound dehiscence or wound discharge (discharge from the wound once the PICO dressing has been discontinued).
Time Frame: For the study duration, up to 6 weeks post-surgery.
|
If there is any wound discharge after the PICO has been discontinued as per the protocol. The duration of wound discharge (any patients experiencing persistent discharge beyond 48 hrs will be brought back to clinic and dealt appropriately as per the Consultants preferred management methods). If there is any wound dehiscence or breakdown (patients will be brought back to clinic and again, dealt appropriately as per consultants preferred wound management method). The management of persistent wound discharge may require hospitalisation, wound washout or continued and/or prolonged use of a PICO dressing. These are all part of the standard of care at RJAH, but their use does vary slightly, depending on individual preferences of the supervising Surgeon. |
For the study duration, up to 6 weeks post-surgery.
|
Observance of the formation of wound complications, specifically superficial wound infection, and deep wound infection.
Time Frame: For the study duration, up to 6 weeks post-surgery.
|
The number of wound complications, specifically concerning superficial wound infections and deep wound infections.
The patient will be monitored at 1 week (clinic visit), 2 week (clinic visit), 3 week (phone call), and 6 weeks (clinic visit).
|
For the study duration, up to 6 weeks post-surgery.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Wound appearance documented by photographs from before the dressing is applied in theatre to 6 weeks post-surgery follow up visit.
Time Frame: For the study duration, up to 6 weeks post-surgery.
|
The appearance of the wound at the 1-week clinic visit, where the dressing is changed or PICO therapy discontinued, depending on the treatment arm that the patient has been randomised to, the 2-week clinic visit, where the "study" cohort of patients will have their second dressing removed and at the 6-week clinic visit.
The evidence of the wound appearance at these time points will be documented through photographs.
|
For the study duration, up to 6 weeks post-surgery.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sudheer L Karlakki, The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital Foundation Trust
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
- Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics. 1975 Mar;31(1):103-15.
- Malmsjo M, Huddleston E, Martin R. Biological effects of a disposable, canisterless negative pressure wound therapy system. Eplasty. 2014 Apr 2;14:e15. eCollection 2014.
- Nherera LM, Trueman P, Karlakki SL. Cost-effectiveness analysis of single-use negative pressure wound therapy dressings (sNPWT) to reduce surgical site complications (SSC) in routine primary hip and knee replacements. Wound Repair Regen. 2017 May;25(3):474-482. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12530. Epub 2017 May 3.
- Helito CP, Bueno DK, Giglio PN, Bonadio MB, Pecora JR, Demange MK. NEGATIVE-PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF COMPLEX INJURIES AFTER TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY. Acta Ortop Bras. 2017 Mar-Apr;25(2):85-88. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220172502169053.
- Miyahara HS, Serzedello FR, Ejnisman L, Lima ALLM, Vicente JRN, Helito CP. INCISIONAL NEGATIVE-PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY IN REVISION TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY DUE TO INFECTION. Acta Ortop Bras. 2018;26(5):300-304. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220182605196038.
- Newman JM, Siqueira MBP, Klika AK, Molloy RM, Barsoum WK, Higuera CA. Use of Closed Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Patients at High Risk for Infection: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Mar;34(3):554-559.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.017. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
- Karlakki SL, Hamad AK, Whittall C, Graham NM, Banerjee RD, Kuiper JH. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy dressings (iNPWTd) in routine primary hip and knee arthroplasties: A randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint Res. 2016 Aug;5(8):328-37. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.58.BJR-2016-0022.R1.
- Barbachano Y, Coad DS. Inference following designs which adjust for imbalances in prognostic factors. Clin Trials. 2013 Aug;10(4):540-51. doi: 10.1177/1740774513493367. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
- The ASA's Statement on p-values: Context, Process, and Purpose
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- RL1 786
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Surgical Wound
-
St. Borbala HospitalSemmelweis University; Department of Surgery, Jahn Ferend Dél-Pesti Kórház... and other collaboratorsTerminatedSurgical Wound | Surgical Site Infection | Wound Dehiscence, Surgical | Dehiscence of Internal Surgical WoundHungary
-
ConvaTec Inc.WithdrawnSurgical Wound, Recent | Trauma-related Wound | Dehiscence Wound | Surgical Wound LeakUnited States
-
Centro Hospitalar do Tâmega e SousaActive, not recruitingSurgical Wound | Surgical Wound Infection | Surgical Site Infection | Surgical Wound, Healed | Surgical Complication | Surgical Wound Dehiscence | Surgical Wound HaemorrhagePortugal
-
Molnlycke Health Care ABSyntactxNot yet recruitingSurgical Wound | Surgical Incision | Surgical Wound Dehiscence | Incision, Surgical | Surgical Wound, Recent
-
Associazione Infermieristica per lo studio delle...Unknown
-
Brock Liden, DPMWithdrawnSurgical Wound, HealedUnited States
-
University of California, DavisCompletedSurgical Wound Cosmesis
-
HITEC-Institute of Medical SciencesCompletedWound Infection | Wound Dehiscence | Wound Surgical | Wound BleedingPakistan
-
Abouqir General HospitalAlexandria UniversityCompletedSurgical Wound Closure TechniqueEgypt
-
Chulalongkorn UniversityUnknownWound Heal | Wound Surgical | Donor Site ComplicationThailand
Clinical Trials on PICO 7
-
St James Connolly Memorial HospitalUnknownWound Infection | Wound ComplicationIreland
-
Indiana UniversityCompletedHypertrophic Skin Condition of Anterior AbdomenUnited States
-
Istituto Clinico HumanitasSmith & Nephew, Inc.RecruitingStoma Site InfectionItaly
-
South Eastern Health and Social Care TrustUnknownNeoplasm Metastasis | Skin Neoplasms | Secondary Malignant Neoplasm of Lymph Node | Non-healing Surgical Wound (Disorder)United Kingdom
-
North Middlesex University Hospital NHS TrustNot yet recruiting
-
University of ArizonaCompletedHigh Risk Pregnancy | Cesarean Wound Disruption With Postnatal ComplicationUnited States
-
Northwell HealthCompletedCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Wound Disruption | Cesarean Wound; DehiscenceUnited States
-
Smith & Nephew, Inc.CompletedDelayed HealingUnited States, South Africa, France, Netherlands
-
Goldman, Butterwick, Fitzpatrick and GroffNot yet recruitingSkin Quality
-
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingGastrointestinal Neoplasms | Stomach Cancer | Small Intestine Cancer | Rectal Cancer | Neuroendocrine Tumor | Bile Duct Cancer | Colon Cancer | Pancreas Cancer | Anal Cancer | Liver Cancer | Biliary Tract Cancer | Peritoneal Cancer | Carcinoid Tumor | Gallbladder Cancer | Cancer Pain | Carcinoid Tumor of the Small Bowel | Visceral... and other conditionsUnited States