Meditation-Based Online Psychological Intervention

February 20, 2026 updated by: li,xinyi, Beijing Normal University

Effects of Mindfulness-of-Death Meditation on Problematic Smartphone Use in Emerging Adulthood

As the primary users of smartphones, emerging adults represent a key population for such research. Using a randomised controlled trial, the investigators compared mindfulness-of-death meditation with traditional mindfulness meditation to evaluate the unique effects of the former on problematic smartphone use. The investigators also examined potential psychological pathways-namely increases in self-esteem and meaning in life, and reductions in perceived stress-through which the intervention may exert its benefits.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

259

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Beijing Normal University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion criteria were adults aged 18-29 years who:

  • reported no current or past psychiatric diagnosis,
  • exhibited problematic smartphone use,
  • and had a mean daily screen-on time exceeding four hours.
  • Exclusion criteria were as follows:
  • aged <18 or ≥30 years;
  • any current or past psychiatric diagnosis;
  • self-reported absence of problematic smartphone use;
  • mean daily smartphone use ≤4 hours;
  • currently enrolled in any meditation-based intervention;
  • use of psychoactive medication or concurrent psychological treatment;
  • participation in another psychological intervention trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mindfulness-Meditation Intervention Group
A 16-day mindfulness-based curriculum was implemented as the intervention, with participants completing one 20-min session daily via the online platform.
The Mindful Breathing Practice (MBP) intervention is a 16-day online meditation program designed to cultivate present-moment awareness by intentionally anchoring attention on the natural rhythm of breathing. The course consists of 16 daily sessions (approximately 15 minutes each), including brief instructional guidance and guided mindful breathing exercises. Participants are guided to observe the bodily sensations of inhalation and exhalation (e.g., the airflow at the nostrils or the rise and fall of the abdomen) and, when attention wanders, to gently bring it back to the breath with a non-judgmental and accepting attitude. The intervention adopts a non-religious approach, involves no spiritual or religious content, and is suitable for the general population.
Experimental: Mindfulness-of-Death Group
A 16-day mindfulness-of-death curriculum was implemented as the intervention, with participants completing one 20 min online session daily.
The Mindfulness of Death (MoD) intervention is a 16-day online meditation program designed to cultivate awareness of death. The course consists of 16 daily sessions (approximately 20 minutes each), including brief psychoeducational content and guided meditation practice. The initial sessions focus on breathing-based mindfulness to establish attentional stability, followed by mindfulness of death practices that emphasize the inevitability and uncertainty of death while encouraging attention to life and the present moment. The intervention adopts a non-religious approach and does not require participants to hold any religious or spiritual beliefs.
No Intervention: Wait-list Control Group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Smartphone Addiction Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention (Day 16), and one-month follow-up
Participants' problematic smartphone use was assessed using the 33-item Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS) [Kwon et al., 2013]. Although the original scale employed a 6-point response format, the present study utilized a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always; α = .88). The scale comprises six dimensions: daily disturbance, positive anticipation, withdrawal symptoms, online intimacy, excessive use, and tolerance. Higher total scores indicate greater severity of problematic smartphone use.
Baseline, post-intervention (Day 16), and one-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived Stress Scale-10
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention (Day 16), and one-month follow-up
Participants' perceived stress was assessed using the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) [Cohen et al., 1983; Chen et al., 2021]. The validated Chinese version [Chen, Tian, Zhang, et al., 2021] was employed in the present study. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always; α = .78-.91). The scale consists of two dimensions: perceived helplessness and self-efficacy belief. Six items assessing self-efficacy belief were reverse-scored. Higher total scores reflect elevated levels of perceived stress.
Baseline, post-intervention (Day 16), and one-month follow-up
Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention (Day 16), and one-month follow-up
Participants' mindfulness was assessed using the 10-item Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale (PHLMS) [Cardaciotto et al., 2008; Zeng et al., 2015]. The validated Chinese version [Zeng, Li, Zhang, & Liu, 2015] was employed in the present study. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always; awareness subscale α = .82; acceptance/avoidance subscale α = .80). The scale comprises two dimensions: awareness and acceptance/avoidance. Five items assessing acceptance/avoidance were reverse-scored. Higher total scores indicate greater mindfulness.
Baseline, post-intervention (Day 16), and one-month follow-up
Self-Control Scale for College Students
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention (Day 16), and one-month follow-up
Participants' self-control was assessed using the 19-item Self-Control Scale for College Students [Tangney et al., 2004; Tan & Guo, 2008]. The validated Chinese version [Tan & Guo, 2008] was employed in the present study. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much; α = .85). The scale comprises five dimensions: impulse control, health habits, resisting temptation, focused work, and moderation in entertainment. Higher total scores reflect greater self-control.
Baseline, post-intervention (Day 16), and one-month follow-up
Boredom Proneness Scale-Short Form
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention (Day 16), and one-month follow-up
Participants' boredom proneness was assessed using the 12-item Short Form of the Boredom Proneness Scale (BPS-SF) [Vodanovich et al., 2005]. Items were rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree; external stimulation deficiency α = .81; internal stimulation deficiency α = .78). The scale comprises two dimensions: external stimulation deficiency and internal stimulation deficiency. Six items assessing internal stimulation deficiency were reverse-scored. Higher total scores indicate greater boredom proneness.
Baseline, post-intervention (Day 16), and one-month follow-up
Three-Dimensional Meaning in Life Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention (Day 16), and one-month follow-up
Participants' meaning in life was assessed using the 11-item Three-Dimensional Meaning in Life Scale (3DM) [Martela & Steger, 2016]. Items were rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 7 (very much; purpose α = .90; coherence α = .84; significance α = .86). The scale comprises three dimensions: purpose, coherence, and significance. Higher total scores reflect greater meaning in life.
Baseline, post-intervention (Day 16), and one-month follow-up
Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention (Day 16), and one-month follow-up
Participants' time perspective was assessed using the 25-item Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI) [Zimbardo & Boyd, 1999]. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (very uncharacteristic) to 5 (very characteristic; past-positive α = .79; past-negative α = .82; present-hedonistic α = .84; present-fatalistic α = .74; future α = .84). The scale comprises five dimensions: past-positive, past-negative, present-hedonistic, present-fatalistic, and future. Higher subscale scores indicate stronger orientation toward that particular time perspective.
Baseline, post-intervention (Day 16), and one-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 23, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 25, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

April 25, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BNU-poslab-MLD-2025

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The decision regarding sharing individual participant data (IPD) has not yet been finalized. Data may be shared in de-identified form after publication, depending on ethical approval and institutional policies at that time.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Smartphone Addiction

Clinical Trials on Mindful Breathing Practice (MBP) - 16-Day Online Meditation Course

Subscribe