Vivifi Device Safety Evaluation for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

July 29, 2026 updated by: Vivifi Medical

Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of the Vivifi Device for Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

The study objective is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the Vivifi device to treat symptomatic, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

The Vivifi Device and procedure will be an alternative treatment for symptomatic BPH. Where other currently available treatments are generally either procedures that destroy and/or remove prostatic tissue or that involve a minimally-invasive surgical therapy, the Vivifi device is a less invasive percutaneous approach that does not require urethral entry, tissue removal, or implants. By addressing a contributing root cause of prostatic growth through a minimally invasive percutaneous approach, unwanted enlargement of the prostate may be halted or reversed, without damage to the prostatic tissue or urethra.These initial clinical studies will test the safety and feasibility of this approach.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Provincia de Panamá
      • Panama City, Provincia de Panamá, Panama
        • Hospital Paitilla

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male 45-80 years of age
  2. Diagnosed with Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
  3. Prostate volume: ≥ 40 ≤ 100 cc measured by MRI
  4. Qmax ≤ 10 mL/s on two measures (voided volume ≥ 125 mL)
  5. Assessment of future paternity plans
  6. Signed the study informed consent
  7. Presence of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) measured by International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) greater than 12

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with prior history of relevant scrotal or testicular vascular surgeries or procedures, or vasectomy.
  2. Previous procedural prostate intervention (TURP, laser, ablation, prostate artery embolization, etc.). Prostate biopsies are acceptable
  3. Intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) > 10 mm
  4. Post-void residual volume (PVR) > 200ml
  5. IPSS QoL score ≤ 3
  6. Prostate cancer diagnosis, suspicious DRE, or PSA > 10ng/mL
  7. Patients with clinical history of chronic prostatitis.
  8. Patients with clinical history of urinary retention with previous need for catheterization (prior 30 days), or urethral strictures.
  9. Major neurological conditions such as Alzheimer's, Parkinsons, Multiple sclerosis, ALS, spinal cord injury
  10. Patients who are unable to undergo the required anesthesia for the procedure
  11. Patients on testosterone replacement therapy
  12. Patients unable to hold blood thinners, or with coagulation related issues
  13. Patients currently taking medication for BPH (eg. Alpha-blockers or 5-ARIs) who are unwilling or unable to discontinue (washout) prior to treatment (14 days for α-blockers (tamsulosin, alfuzosin, silodosin, doxazosin, terazosin), 8 weeks for finasteride, 5 months for dutasteride)
  14. Diagnosis of Hidradenitis suppurativa

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Minimally invasive percutaneous ablation
Percutaneous ablation will be used to modify the vascular supply to the prostate via a minimally invasive scrotal approach
Percutaneous ablation will be used to modify the vascular supply to the prostate via a minimally invasive scrotal approach

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Safety Endpoint
Time Frame: 24 month follow-up
Number of participants experiencing device or procedure related adverse events assessed by severity and causality.
24 month follow-up
Mean change from baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 24 months
Time Frame: From baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 18 months, 24 months post-procedure.
The IPSS is a validated 7-item questionnaire scored 0-25: higher scores indicate worse urinary symptoms. Mean change from baseline will be reported.
From baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 18 months, 24 months post-procedure.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change from baseline in ejaculatory function assessed by Male Sexual Health Questionnaire for Ejaculatory Dysfunction (MSHQ-EjD)
Time Frame: From baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 18 months, 24 months post-procedure.
The Male Sexual Health Questionnaire for Ejaculatory Dysfunction (MSHQ-EjD) is a validated, 4 item, patient-reported outcome instrument that assesses ejaculatory function and bother in men, evaluating domains of ejaculation force, volume, frequency, and satisfaction. A higher score on the first 3 domains indicates better ejaculatory function and the final domain indicates higher quality of life.
From baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 18 months, 24 months post-procedure.
Mean change from baseline in prostate volume (cc) measured by MRI
Time Frame: From baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 18 months, 24 months post-procedure.
Mean change from baseline in prostate volume (cubic centimeters) as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at specified follow-up time points. A reduction in prostate volume is desirable.
From baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 18 months, 24 months post-procedure.
Mean change from baseline in peak urinary flow rate (Qmax, mL/s) measured by uroflow
Time Frame: From baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 18 months, 24 months post-procedure.
Mean change from baseline in peak urinary flow rate (Qmax, milliliters per second) as measured by uroflowmetry at specified follow-up time points.
From baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 18 months, 24 months post-procedure.
Mean change from baseline in post-void residual volume (PVR, mL) measured by ultrasound or bladder scan
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 18 months, 24 months post-procedure.
Mean change from baseline in post-void residual urine volume (PVR, milliliters) as measured by ultrasound or bladder scan at specified follow-up time points.
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 18 months, 24 months post-procedure.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedure Duration
Time Frame: Day of procedure
Time of procedure in minutes
Day of procedure
Change from baseline in serum PSA (ng/dl) and testosterone (ng/dl)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Mean change from baseline in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA, nanograms per milliliter) and total testosterone (nanograms per deciliter) as measured by standard laboratory assay at specified follow-up time points.
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Cystoscopic assessment of urethral and bladder integrity
Time Frame: From baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Cystoscopic evaluation of urethral and bladder mucosal integrity at specified follow-up time points to assess for procedure-related anatomical changes or adverse findings.
From baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Daniel Root, MD

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CIP-US-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe