Validation of the Vision Trainer Clinical Decision-Support Software

August 25, 2026 updated by: Fareedah Haroun, University of Pennsylvania

Validation of the Vision Trainer Clinical Decision-Support Software:A Randomized Comparison of Software-Guided Subjective Refraction(JCC and Non-JCC Algorithms) Against Unassisted Manual Refraction

This study is a prospective, randomized, crossover clinical investigation designed to evaluate the accuracy, efficiency, and usability of the Vision Trainer software for subjective refraction. The study compares software-guided refraction, implemented using both Jackson Cross Cylinder (JCC) and Non-JCC workflows, against standard unassisted manual refraction performed by trained examiners

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

128

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Pennsylvania Presbyterian Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Chace Brokaw
          • Phone Number: 215-662-9702

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provision of signed and dated informed consent form prior to any study procedures.
  • Age ≥18 years at the time of informed consent.
  • Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of at least 20/40 in both eyes, measured with current spectacle or contact lens correction.
  • Able to provide informed consent in English.
  • Willing and able to complete an approximately 25-30-minute study visit
  • No significant ocular pathology or media opacity that would preclude accurate standard refraction.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ocular pathology significantly affecting visual function: untreated or advanced glaucoma, advanced age-related macular degeneration, proliferative diabetic retinopathy with vision loss, current retinal detachment, or other posterior segment disease materially impairing BCVA.
  • Recent ocular surgery within the prior 6 months, including refractive surgery (LASIK, PRK, SMILE, phakic IOL), cataract surgery, or other intraocular procedures.
  • Spherical equivalent refractive error exceeding ±12 Diopters.
  • Any medical condition or circumstance that, in the judgment of the Investigator, would preclude safe or valid participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Randomized 1:1
Experimental: Treatment Arm
Receive the Vision Training Softward
Participants will receive the vision software trainer when randomized 1:1

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1st Outcome Measure
Time Frame: Baseline

To demonstrate non-inferiority of Vision Trainer software-guided refraction (JCC and Non-JCC workflows combined) versus unassisted standard manual refraction in terms of prescription accuracy. Two co-primary effectiveness endpoints are defined at the eye level. The first endpoint is the signed difference in Mean Spherical Equivalent (MSE), calculated as $$D_{MSE} = \text{MSE}_{software} - \text{MSE}_{unassisted}$$.

The second endpoint is astigmatic component accuracy, computed as signed Thibos power-vector component differences:

$$D_{J0} = J_{0,software} - J_{0,unassisted}, \quad D_{J45} = J_{45,software} - J_{45,unassisted}$$.

Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary Outcome Measure
Time Frame: Baseline
Time-to-completion for software-guided vs. unassisted refraction
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 19, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 26-7073

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe