Clinical Evaluation of Two Post Systems for Single Crown Restoration of Anterior Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

September 14, 2026 updated by: Mohamed el sayed bekhiet, Cairo University
This randomized controlled trial evaluates two post systems used to restore endodontically treated (root canal treated) maxillary anterior teeth with 1-2 missing coronal walls. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either a custom-adapted polyethylene fibers post (Ribbond-type, individually formed) or a prefabricated fiber post, followed by a composite core and crown restoration. The primary outcome is the distance between the post and the remaining root canal filling (gutta-percha), measured radiographically, which reflects how well the post adapts within the canal. The secondary outcome is post and restoration retention, assessed clinically using USPHS criteria. Participants will be followed for 6 months. The study aims to determine whether a custom-fitted fiber post provides better adaptation and retention compared to a standard prefabricated fiber post in teeth with significant structural loss.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Endodontically treated maxillary anterior teeth frequently present with significant loss of coronal tooth structure, compromising their resistance to fracture and complicating restoration. prefabricated fiber posts are widely used to retain a composite core prior to crown placement, but the degree to which a post adapts to the internal canal wall - leaving minimal or no gap between the post and the remaining gutta-percha - may influence long-term clinical performance and resistance to microleakage.

This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing a custom-adapted ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fibers post (Ribbond-type), individually formed to the canal anatomy, against a prefabricated fiber post. Eligible teeth are endodontically treated maxillary anterior teeth with 1-2 missing coronal axial walls (mesial, distal, labial, and/or palatal), assessed at the cementoenamel junction, where any remaining sound walls meet a minimum height of 1.5-2 mm and a circumferential thickness of approximately 1 mm, in line with established ferrule criteria.

Participants will be randomly allocated to receive either the Ribbond post or the prefabricated fiber post, followed by a standardized composite core build-up and definitive crown restoration. Post space preparation, dentin conditioning, and cementation will follow a standardized step-by-step clinical protocol for each group.

The primary outcome is the post-gutta-percha gap distance, measured radiographically and expressed continuously in millimeters, with cases additionally classified as showing no gap versus any measurable gap. This dichotomization and its expected baseline distribution are informed by prior clinical data reporting outcomes in maxillary anterior teeth. The secondary outcome is post and restoration retention, evaluated clinically at follow-up using USPHS criteria.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

84

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Manial
      • Cairo, Manial, Egypt, 11553

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Endodontically treated maxillary anterior teeth (incisors and/or canines)
  • Presence of 1-2 missing coronal axial walls (mesial, distal, labial, and/or palatal), assessed at the cementoenamel junction (CEJ)
  • Remaining sound tooth structure meeting minimum ferrule criteria: wall height ≥1.5-2 mm and circumferential thickness ≈1 mm
  • Adequate root canal filling with no radiographic signs of periapical pathology
  • Root length and canal morphology suitable for post space preparation
  • Patients aged 20-40 years
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent and attend follow-up visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Teeth with 3 or more missing coronal axial walls (insufficient ferrule)
  • Evidence of active periapical pathology, root fracture, or root resorption
  • Insufficient remaining root length for adequate post retention
  • Signs of periodontal disease affecting tooth prognosis (e.g., mobility, inadequate periodontal support)
  • Systemic conditions contraindicating routine dental treatment
  • Pregnancy (if radiographic follow-up is required)
  • Inability to attend scheduled follow-up visits

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Prefabricated Fiber Post with Composite Core
Participants receive a prefabricated fiber post, followed by a composite core build-up and definitive crown restoration.
Participants receive a custom-fit UHMWPE fiber post, individually adapted to the canal at chairside, followed by a composite core build-up and definitive crown restoration.
Experimental: Custom-Fit UHMWPE Fiber Post with Composite Core
Participants receive a custom-fit UHMWPE fiber post, individually adapted to the canal at chairside, followed by a composite core build-up and definitive crown restoration.
Participants receive a custom-fit UHMWPE fiber post, individually adapted to the canal at chairside, followed by a composite core build-up and definitive crown restoration.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-Gutta-Percha Gap Distance
Time Frame: Immediately post-cementation (baseline)
Distance between the outer surface of the cemented post and the residual root canal filling (gutta-percha), measured radiographically at the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of the post space. Reported both as a continuous measurement (mm) and dichotomized as no gap versus any measurable gap.
Immediately post-cementation (baseline)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post and Restoration Retention
Time Frame: 6 months post-cementation
Clinical retention of the post-core-crown restoration, assessed using United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria.
6 months post-cementation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mohamed labib zamzam, PHD, Fixed Prosthodontics Faculty of Oral and dental medicine Cairo University
  • Study Chair: omnia nabil, PHD, Fixed Prosthodontics Faculty of Oral and dental medicine Cairo University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 2, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

September 18, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe