- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07851506
Continuous Adductor Canal Block (CACB) Combined With İnfiltration Between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (iPACK) Block vs Continuous Adductor Canal Block Alone After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Comparison of the Effects of iPACK Block Combined With Continuous Adductor Canal Block Versus Continuous Adductor Canal Block Alone on Postoperative Analgesia, Early Mobilization, and Length of Hospital Stay in Total Knee Arthroplasty Cases
This study compares the effects of adding an infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (iPACK) block to a continuous adductor canal block (CACB) versus continuous adductor canal block alone on postoperative analgesia, opioid consumption, early mobilization, and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind study with 54 patients allocated 1:1 into two groups.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Severe postoperative pain occurs in up to 58% of patients after total knee arthroplasty. Peripheral nerve blocks are an effective component of multimodal analgesia, and the continuous adductor canal block (CACB) has become a preferred technique because it provides sensory blockade while sparing motor function of the quadriceps, allowing earlier ambulation compared to femoral nerve block. However, CACB does not address posterior knee pain, which can be targeted by the iPACK (infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee) block, a technique that blocks terminal sensory branches of the tibial and peroneal nerves without motor blockade.
In this study, patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty will be randomized 1:1 (using randomizer.org) to receive either CACB alone (Group 2) or CACB combined with a single-injection iPACK block (Group 1). CACB will be maintained via a perineural catheter connected to a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump delivering 0.1% bupivacaine. Rescue analgesia will be provided with intravenous tramadol (50 mg, max 300 mg/day) when the numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score exceeds 4.
Pain scores (NRS 0-10), total analgesic and opioid consumption, hemodynamic parameters, time to first mobilization (assessed via the Timed Up and Go test), patient satisfaction, and length of hospital stay will be recorded at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively by an anesthesiologist blinded to group allocation, different from the anesthesiologist who performed the block.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Muzaffer GENCER, MD
- Phone Number: 905059436459
- Email: dr.m.gencer07@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Furkan TONTU, MD
- Phone Number: 905465771656
- Email: furkantontu@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Istanbul
-
Başakşehir, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye), 34480
- Basaksehir Çam Ve Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye
-
Contact:
- Muzaffer GENCER, MD
- Phone Number: 905059436459
- Email: dr.m.gencer07@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- Murat Y MERSİN, MD
- Phone Number: 905367736432
- Email: myasinmersin@gmail.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Furkan TONTU, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Muzaffer GENCER, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Murat Y Mersin, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients of either sex
- Aged 18 to 75 years
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II, or III
- Voluntary participation
- Fully oriented and able to cooperate with postoperative assessments
Exclusion Criteria:
- ASA physical status IV or V
- Patients who decline to participate
- Pediatric patients
- Active infection at the block site
- Chronic pain or regular analgesic use
- Coagulation disorders
- Inability to cooperate with postoperative pain assessment
- Known allergy to local anesthetics
- Neuropathy or myopathy in the operated extremity
- Revision arthroplasty cases
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group 1 (CACB + iPACK)
Continuous adductor canal block (catheter, PCA with 0.1% bupivacaine) plus a single-injection iPACK block (0.25% bupivacaine 20 mL) |
Single injection of 0.25% bupivacaine 20 mL between the popliteal artery and posterior knee capsule, performed under ultrasound guidance Perineural catheter placement in the adductor canal with PCA-delivered 0.1% bupivacaine (5-7 mL basal rate, 5 mL bolus, 30-min lockout) for 24 hours postoperatively |
|
Active Comparator: Group 2 (CACB Alone)
Continuous adductor canal block alone (catheter, PCA with 0.1% bupivacaine) |
Perineural catheter placement in the adductor canal with PCA-delivered 0.1% bupivacaine (5-7 mL basal rate, 5 mL bolus, 30-min lockout) for 24 hours postoperatively |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative Pain Score (Numeric Rating Scale)
Time Frame: Baseline and postoperative hours 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24
|
Pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable) |
Baseline and postoperative hours 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Total Opioid Consumption
Time Frame: Postoperative 24 hours
|
Total rescue analgesic (tramadol) consumption via intravenous (IV) administration |
Postoperative 24 hours
|
|
Total Local Anesthetic Consumption
Time Frame: Postoperative 24 hours
|
Total bupivacaine consumed via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump |
Postoperative 24 hours
|
|
Time to First Mobilization
Time Frame: Postoperative 24 hours
|
Time to first unassisted ambulation/movement, assessed via the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test |
Postoperative 24 hours
|
|
Length of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: From surgery to discharge (up to approximately 1 week)
|
Number of days from surgery to discharge |
From surgery to discharge (up to approximately 1 week)
|
|
Patient Satisfaction Score
Time Frame: Postoperative 24 hours
|
Satisfaction rated on a 4-point scale (1 = not satisfied, 2 = Slightly satisfied, 3 = Satisfied, 4 = very satisfied) |
Postoperative 24 hours
|
|
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Baseline and postoperative hours 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24
|
Systolic blood pressure measured in mmHg |
Baseline and postoperative hours 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24
|
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Baseline and postoperative hours 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24
|
Diastolic blood pressure measured in mmHg |
Baseline and postoperative hours 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24
|
|
Mean Arterial Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Baseline and postoperative hours 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24
|
Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) measured in mmHg |
Baseline and postoperative hours 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24
|
|
Heart Rate
Time Frame: Baseline and postoperative hours 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24
|
Heart rate measured in beats per minute |
Baseline and postoperative hours 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24
|
|
Peripheral Oxygen Saturation
Time Frame: Baseline and postoperative hours 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24
|
Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) measured as a percentage |
Baseline and postoperative hours 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24
|
|
Block-Related Complications
Time Frame: Throughout study participation (up to 24 hours postoperatively)
|
Incidence of complications associated with the regional block techniques (e.g., nerve injury, infection) |
Throughout study participation (up to 24 hours postoperatively)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Furkan TONTU, MD, BAŞAKŞEHİR ÇAM VE SAKURA ŞEHİR HASTANESİ
- Study Director: Muzaffer GENCER, MD, BAŞAKŞEHİR ÇAM VE SAKURA ŞEHİR HASTANESİ
- Study Director: Murat Y Mersin, MD, BAŞAKŞEHİR ÇAM VE SAKURA ŞEHİR HASTANESİt
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Seo SS, Kim OG, Seo JH, Kim DH, Kim YG, Park BY. Comparison of the Effect of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block and Adductor Canal Block after Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2017 Sep;9(3):303-309. doi: 10.4055/cios.2017.9.3.303. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
- Diz Protezi Ameliyatı Sonrası Sürekli Adduktör Kanal Bloğuna Popliteal Arter ve Diz Kapsülü Arası İnfiltrasyon Bloğunun (IPACK) Eklenmesinin Etkisi DOI: 10.1080/11101849.2023.2246732
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- BSH-ANES-MYM-02
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Individual participant data will not be shared beyond what is reported in publications resulting from this study.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.