CANLINK: Evaluation of the Intralink Intradiscal Device for Low Back Pain Due to Degenerative Disc Disease

November 2, 2026 updated by: Spinal Simplicity LLC

CANLINK: A Prospective Clinical Study Evaluating the Safety and Performance of the Intralink Intradiscal Device for Treatment of Low Back Pain From Degenerative Disc Disease

A single site, prospective study to evaluate the safety and performance of the Intralink device in participants with chronic or recurrent non-radicular discogenic low back pain (LBP) due to degenerative disc disease (DDD).

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Intralink device in participants with chronic or recurrent non-radicular discogenic LBP due to DDD.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 22 - 80 years
  • Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD)
  • Six (6) months or more of chronic low back pain and failure to respond to conservative care
  • Pain medication use has been stable for at least 30 days

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Body Mass Index (BMI) >40 kg/m2
  • Uncontrolled diabetes
  • Symptomatic DDD at more than 2 levels
  • Previously diagnosed Paget's disease, osteomalacia, other metabolic bone disease
  • Target disc collapse (disc height loss)
  • Active systemic or spine infection
  • Recent (< 3 months) therapeutic interventions (i.e., IDET, PRP or stem cell injections) on the target disc(s)
  • Any surgery at the index level (i.e. discectomy or intradiscal ablation) or any extensive surgery (fusion, artificial disc, laminectomy) at any lumbar level
  • Previous treatment of target disc level with steroid injection, intradiscal injection, trigger point injection, facet or medial branch block within 90 days of enrollment
  • Active malignancy
  • Spinal tumor
  • Presence of extruded disc herniation or wide annular fissures confluent with large disc protrusions at the symptomatic level.
  • Symptomatic spinal stenosis (i.e., neurogenic claudication)
  • Congenital or degenerative spondylolisthesis greater than grade 1
  • Currently participating in another investigational study that could interfere with the outcome measures of this study
  • Known anaphylactic reaction to contrast dye
  • Opioid medication >60 MME/day within 60 days of enrollment
  • If female, participants who are pregnant or are trying to become pregnant during the course of the trial (due to risks of additional radiation exposures); participants of child-bearing potential that are sexually active must use a reliable form of birth control and present a negative urine pregnancy test prior to the implant procedure
  • Other protocol defined inclusion/exclusion may apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment

Intralink Device

Device: Intralink

Other Names:
  • Intralink

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: 1 Month compared to Baseline

Change from baseline in mean disability scores using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) ODI is a self-reported questionnaire widely used to track changes in a patient's condition over time and evaluate the effectiveness of treatments for low back pain. The ODI consists of 10 sections, each addressing a specific aspect of daily functioning. A higher score indicates greater disability. The final score/index ranges from 0-100 scale. A score of 0-20 reflects minimal disability, 21-40 moderate disability, 41-60 severe disability, 61-80 crippled, and 81-100 bed bound.

1 Month compared to Baseline
Assess occurrence of serious adverse events post-treatment.
Time Frame: Through 1 Month post procedure

Frequency of serious adverse events post implant

Through 1 Month post procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate type of adverse events
Time Frame: Baseline through 6 months post procedure

Incidence and type of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)

Baseline through 6 months post procedure
Assess change from baseline in mean disability scores using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) post-procedure
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post procedure

Change from baseline in mean disability scores using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) ODI is a self-reported questionnaire widely used to track changes in a patient's condition over time and evaluate the effectiveness of treatments for low back pain. The ODI consists of 10 sections, each addressing a specific aspect of daily functioning. A higher score indicates greater disability. The final score/index ranges from 0-100 scale. A score of 0-20 reflects minimal disability, 21-40 moderate disability, 41-60 severe disability, 61-80 crippled, and 81-100 bed bound.

3, 6, 12, and 24 months post procedure
Assess change from baseline in mean pain scores using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 1, 3, 5, 12, and 24 months post procedure

Change from baseline in mean pain scores using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) The VAS is a pain screening tool, commonly used to assess pain severity at that moment in time using a 0-100 mm scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 100 meaning "the worst pain imaginable".

1, 3, 5, 12, and 24 months post procedure
Evaluate change of baseline spinal instability using flexion-extension radiographic imaging
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 5, 12, and 24 months

Proportion of participants with a 50% or greater reduction from baseline value in spinal instability (when baseline value is greater than or equal to 1.0), as measured by vertebral angular motion and sagittal plane translations on flexion-extension radiographs

Baseline, 1, 3, 5, 12, and 24 months
Assess use of escalated interventions post-procedure
Time Frame: From Baseline to 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months

Any of the following count as escalated interventions: increase pain medication use and additional interventions - i.e. injections and surgical interventions at the treatment level.

From Baseline to 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-implant

The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) PGIC is a standardized tool designed to assess a patient's self-reported perception of improvement or worsening in their health status over time. The PGIC consists of 1 question, using a 1 to 7 scale: 1-Very Much Improved to 7-Very much Worse.

1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-implant
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-implant

Patient Satisfaction Survey is designed to assess a patient's self-reported satisfaction or dissatisfaction on a 5 point scale. 1- Very Satisfied to 5-Very Dissatisfied

1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-implant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CANLINK-2026-CIP

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe