Aggression in Military Personnel (MERA)

November 5, 2026 updated by: Shannon Miles, James A. Haley Veterans Administration Hospital

Reducing Aggression in Military Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial

We propose to study if Manage Emotions to Reduce Aggression (MERA) is helpful in reducing anger and aggression in active duty service members by comparing it to self monitoring of one's anger and aggression. The proposed study has two treatment groups. The first group will receive MERA and then monitor their anger and aggression for 3 more weeks. The second group will be asked to monitor their anger and aggression for 3 weeks prior to receiving MERA. All service members will receive MERA and will be asked to self-monitor, but the order in which they are asked to complete these tasks will be randomized.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

106

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Active duty service member 18 years or older.
  2. Currently meets criteria for full or subthreshold PTSD, determined by the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5-R (CAPS-5-R; Jackson et al., 2024) endorsing trauma exposure and a score of > 3 on at least 1 Cluster B, 1 Cluster C, 1 Cluster D, and 1 Cluster E symptom. Symptoms must be present for at least 1 month with clinically significant distress and/or functional impairment (items 23-25 with scores of > 2).
  3. Engaged in at least 3 self-reported aggressive acts (e.g., yelling, throwing objects, hitting objects/people) in the last month, measured by the 20-item Overt Aggression Scale (OAS; Yudofsky et al., 1986).
  4. Impulsive aggression is primary form of aggression, determined by the Impulsive Premeditated Aggression Scale (IPAS; Standford et al., 2001).
  5. Clinically significant anger determined by scores of >12 on the Dimensions of Anger Reactions (DAR-5; Forbes et al., 2014) scale.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Currently suicidal or homicidal ideation severe enough to warrant immediate attention (as determined by the Depressive Symptoms Index - Suicidality Subscale and the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview short form) and corroborated by a clinical risk assessment by a credentialed provider.

  2. Unable to complete self-report measures based on clinical judgement.

  3. Current manic episode as indicated on the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ; Hirschfeld et al., 2000) or experiencing psychotic symptoms as indicated on the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-16; Ising et al., 2012) requiring immediate stabilization or hospitalization (as determined by clinical assessment and judgment).

  4. Had a psychotropic medication change within 4 weeks prior to the baseline assessment. Service members receiving general mental health services or engaging in usual care will be allowed to participate.

    -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Manage Emotions to Reduce Aggression (MERA) X Self-Monitoring

MERA followed by Self-Monitoring.

Three session treatment that teaches the adaptive value of emotions and emotion regulation skills.

Three weeks of tracking anger and aggression and weekly check-ins with study team to assess for risk level.

Active Comparator: Self-Monitoring X Manage Emotions to Reduce Aggression (MERA)

Self-monitoring followed by MERA.

Three session treatment that teaches the adaptive value of emotions and emotion regulation skills.

Three weeks of tracking anger and aggression and weekly check-ins with study team to assess for risk level.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overt Aggression Scale - Modified (OAS-M)
Time Frame: Baseline to 4-week, 8-week, and 20-week post treatment assessments.

Overt Aggression Scale (OAS; Yudofsky et al., 1986) is a 16-item self-report measure that assesses frequency of verbal and physical aggression against self, other, and objects. Investigators added 3 items to assess aggression while driving and in virtual communication (e.g. aggression while texting or emailing) and gave a blank for other aggressive behavior. Investigators adapted the instructions to rate aggression over the past week. There are 20 items on the OAS-M. Pilot data demonstrated that this adapted measure is sensitive to detect changes in aggression frequency during the 3 weeks of MERA (Miles, Kent, et al., 2020). Self-reported aggressive acts will be summed to create an OAS total frequency count of aggressive acts at each assessment, with greater scores indicating more acts of aggression in the past week.

Baseline to 4-week, 8-week, and 20-week post treatment assessments.
State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2: State Anger (STAXI-2 S-Anger) Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline to 4-week, 8-week, and 20-week post treatment assessments.

State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 Subscale-Anger (STAXI-2 S-Anger; Spielberger, 2010) is a 15-item subscale from the STAXI-2 that measures anger. Investigators adapted the instructions to measure anger in the past week. Items in this subscale ask participants to indicate how much they are experiencing certain feelings and desires on a four-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Scores are summed to assess the overall intensity of anger felt in the past week. The total score range is 15-60, with greater scores indicating higher levels of anger.

Baseline to 4-week, 8-week, and 20-week post treatment assessments.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shannon Miles, PhD, James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

November 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Sharing of the data collected in the conduct of the proposed project will be deposited into the National Institutes of Mental Health (NIMH) Data Archive (NDA) and the UT Health San Antonio Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved STRONG STAR Repository (HSC2010-475H) for future use.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

One year after the end of the study.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Any future research using Repository data will require a research protocol for the proposed study reviewed and approved by an authorized official responsible for protecting human subjects of research. The data protections for privacy and confidentiality described in the consent form will apply to any future use of stored data.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe