Port Size and Post-Operative Pain Perception by Patients
30. januar 2018 opdateret af: Elizabeth Mueller, Loyola University
The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in pain perception by participants when the assistant port size varies by 50% (8 mm to 12 mm).
Studieoversigt
Status
Afsluttet
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Detaljeret beskrivelse
Minimally invasive approaches trade a single longer incision for 4-5 smaller incisions that allow abdominal access and abdominal insufflation through "ports". The increase in operative times is mostly due to the need to pass suture, needles, cameras and instruments through the abdominal ports. While, it is intuitive that smaller abdominal ports will result in less pain at the incision site, the port size is also limited by instrument size and the size of the needle. When ports are smaller, it can take a little more time for a needle or instrument to be passed into the port.
There is a paucity of research comparing different port sizes as they relate to participate pain and operative time especially in a randomized controlled trial setting. The investigators goal would be to determine if there is a difference in pain perception by patients when the assistant port size varies by 50% (8 mm to 12 mm).
Undersøgelsestype
Interventionel
Tilmelding (Faktiske)
35
Fase
- Ikke anvendelig
Kontakter og lokationer
Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.
Studiesteder
-
-
Illinois
-
Maywood, Illinois, Forenede Stater, 60153
- Loyola University Medical Center
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
- Barn
- Voksen
- Ældre voksen
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Ingen
Køn, der er berettiget til at studere
Kvinde
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- laparoscopic surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
- proficiency in English .
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not proficiency in English
- Previous participation/randomization in the study at a previous visit
- Pregnant women cannot participate
- History of abdominal wall pain
- Chronic pain patients
Studieplan
Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Forebyggelse
- Tildeling: Randomiseret
- Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
- Maskning: Enkelt
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Aktiv komparator: 8mm Port
Participates will be randomized to have an 8 mm assistant port used during their surgery.
The participate will be asked to specify the point that represents their level of perceived pain intensity and mark it on the scale at four time points: baseline pain prior to the procedure in the pre-operatively holding area, 4 to 6 hours post operatively, on Post Operative Day 1 (POD1).
The final pain assessment will be at the two weeks postoperative clinic visit.
|
Participate in this arm will have their procedure performed with an 8mm laparoscopic port.
|
|
Eksperimentel: 12mm Port
Participates will be randomized to have an 12mm assistant port used during their surgery.
The participate will be asked to specify the point that represents their level of perceived pain intensity and mark it on the scale at four time points: baseline pain prior to the procedure in the pre-operatively holding area, 4 to 6 hours post operatively, on Post Operative Day 1 (POD1).
The final pain assessment will be at the two weeks postoperative clinic visit.
|
Participate in this arm will have their procedure performed with a 12mm laparoscopic port.
|
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Participants will be asked to specify the point that represents their level of perceived pain intensity and mark it on the VAS at four time points.
Tidsramme: 2 weeks post-op visit
|
Measured with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain at 1) baseline pain prior to the procedure in the pre-operatively holding area, 2) 4-6 hours post-operatively in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), 3) on post-operative day 1(POD1) and 4) once two weeks post operatively.
|
2 weeks post-op visit
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
What is the physician's perception of operative difficulty throughout the case? Determination of physician struggle and frustration will be documented.
Tidsramme: Day of surgery
|
This will be measured by recording the time the first suture is placed when the physician asks for the mesh, to the time the incision is closed.
|
Day of surgery
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.
Sponsor
Efterforskere
- Ledende efterforsker: Elizabeth R Mueller, MD, Loyola University Health System
Publikationer og nyttige links
Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.
Generelle publikationer
- Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Visco AG. Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;112(6):1201-1206. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818ce394.
- Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Apr;89(4):501-6. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6.
- Nygaard I, Bradley C, Brandt D; Women's Health Initiative. Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: prevalence and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Sep;104(3):489-97. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000136100.10818.d8.
- McDermott CD, Hale DS. Abdominal, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2009 Sep;36(3):585-614. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2009.09.004.
Datoer for undersøgelser
Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.
Studer store datoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
1. august 2015
Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)
16. november 2017
Studieafslutning (Faktiske)
16. november 2017
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
24. juli 2015
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
10. august 2015
Først opslået (Skøn)
13. august 2015
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
1. februar 2018
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
30. januar 2018
Sidst verificeret
1. januar 2018
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- 207726
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .