Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Investigating the Prevalence and Prognostic Importance of Polypharmacy in Adults Treated for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)

29. juni 2018 opdateret af: Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Prevalence and prognostic significance of polypharmacy has not been evaluated in adults undergoing treatment for AML. Investigating the significance of polypharmacy in this population may help improve patient assessment and provide an opportunity to design simple interventions to minimize unnecessary morbidity associated with treatment.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljeret beskrivelse

The incidence of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) increases with age. Older AML patients, generally defined by age 60 years and above, have worse treatment outcomes than younger patients. While selected older patients can benefit from standard therapies, as a group they experience increased treatment-related toxicity, decreased remission rates, decreased disease-free survival and decreased overall survival. Outcome disparity is in part explained by age related biologic features. Older patients are more likely to present with unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities, multidrug resistance phenotypes, and secondary AML. However, even older adults with favorable tumor biology have a worse prognosis compared to younger patients. Patient-specific factors including impaired physical function and comorbidity independently predict increased treatment toxicity and decreased survival. Improving patient assessment strategies is critical to identify those patients who are most likely to benefit from induction and post-remission therapies.

Treatment decision-making for older adults is hampered by the difficulty of accurately predicting vulnerability to toxicity. Increasing age alone is a risk factor for poor response to therapy. Older adults of the same chronologic age represent a heterogeneous population. Multiple patient-specific factors may impact an older adult's ability to tolerate tumor burden and treatments. Comorbid disease, functional status and cognitive status are examples of factors that reflect an individual patient's reserve capacity; none of these can be adequately assessed with chronologic age alone.

Translating geriatric assessment strategies into the evaluation of older patients with acute leukemia should help refine the treatment approach to this population. One strategy commonly used in geriatric medicine is the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). CGA refers to a multidisciplinary evaluation of geriatric domains, including comorbid disease, physical function, cognitive function, psychological state, nutritional status, and medication management. In older cancer patients CGA can identify problems that may interfere with cancer treatment and is recommended by the NCCN Guidelines for "Senior Adult Oncology". The optimal measures to use and how to change management based on results are less clear.

Medication management may be of particular importance for older adults with AML due to the potentially high prevalence of polypharmacy in this population. Studies of older adults with cancer report average numbers of medications ranging from 4-9. These numbers may be higher for patients being actively treated for acute leukemia. Polypharmacy is associated with increased adverse drug reactions and increased risk of drug-drug interactions. Careful medication review with discontinuation of potentially unnecessary or inappropriate medications may minimize negative consequences of polypharmacy.

To date, however, prevalence and prognostic significance of polypharmacy has not been evaluated in adults undergoing treatment for AML. Investigating the significance of polypharmacy in this population may help improve patient assessment and provide an opportunity to design simple interventions to minimize unnecessary morbidity associated with treatment.

Undersøgelsestype

Observationel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

209

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

60 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Prøveudtagningsmetode

Ikke-sandsynlighedsprøve

Studiebefolkning

Adults age ≥60 who received treatment while hospitalized for AML

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hospitalized between January 2004 and December 2009 with newly diagnosed AML
  • Age ≥60 years at the time of diagnosis
  • Received treatment while hospitalized for AML

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 30-day mortality data unavailable

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Observationsmodeller: Kohorte
  • Tidsperspektiver: Tilbagevirkende kraft

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Prevalence of polypharmacy in adults ≥60 years of age hospitalized for treatment of newly diagnosed AML
Tidsramme: Day 1 (admission)
Number of medications at baseline
Day 1 (admission)
Prevalence of polypharmacy in adults ≥60 years of age hospitalized for treatment of newly diagnosed AML
Tidsramme: Through hospitilization, an average of 30 days
Number of medications at discharge
Through hospitilization, an average of 30 days

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart

1. august 2010

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. april 2014

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

1. november 2014

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

19. januar 2016

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

21. januar 2016

Først opslået (Skøn)

26. januar 2016

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

2. juli 2018

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

29. juni 2018

Sidst verificeret

1. juni 2018

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • IRB00014134
  • CCCWFU 22410 (Anden identifikator: Wake Forest University Health Sciences)

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner