- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk forsøg NCT03271658
Mixed Methods Study Web-based Life Support Decision Aid (eLSDA)
Development of an Individualized, Web-Based Life Support Decision Aid (eLSDA) Concerning Goals of Care for the Seriously Ill Patient
Studieoversigt
Status
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Detaljeret beskrivelse
A concurrent mixed method study of a life support decision aid (eLSDA) intends to prepare hospitalized, seriously ill older adult patients and their families to participate in shared decision-making. The study includes 1) randomized controlled trial and 2) a qualitative (naturalistic observation) study. The experimental study compares a convenience cohort of participants who receive usual care (n=60 patients or patient/surrogate pairs) to a cohort of participants who receive the intervention (n=60 patients or patient/surrogate pairs). The investigators intend to measure a) knowledge of life-sustaining technologies, b) clarity of values, c) congruence between documented physician's orders and patient choice, d) decisional conflict, and e) quality of communication. For the intervention group only, investigators will measure comprehensibility and acceptability of the eLSDA. The observational qualitative study derived from naturalistic observation will involve participant observation to examine dialogue about life support between hospitalized, seriously ill older adult patients, families and their healthcare professionals. Quantitative and qualitative data will be collected to better understand the comprehensibility, acceptability, usability, feasibility and impact of the eLSDA used in routine clinical practice.
Questionnaires, patient/family/physician discussions and web based tool viewing will be completed in a hospital setting. The investigator will administer pre-intervention questionnaires to the participants, which will take approximately 15 minutes. Participants will then be randomized to groups, and be invited to use the web based eLSDA or usual care materials on a laptop computer or tablet (30 minutes). This will be followed by post-intervention questionnaires in a second interview (15 minutes). Physicians and nurses/social workers will be asked to complete a survey to examine the barriers to discussions about goals of care (15 minutes). The investigator will also fill out the chart abstraction tool after the participants give consent.
Undersøgelsestype
Tilmelding (Faktiske)
Fase
- Ikke anvendelig
Kontakter og lokationer
Studiesteder
-
-
Saskatchewan
-
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, S7N 0W8
- Royal University Hospital
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Køn, der er berettiget til at studere
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Potential users of eLSDA, which are those who are hospitalized, seriously ill, older patients, their families, and their health care providers.
Age 55 + with one or more of the following diseases:
- Chronic obstructive lung disease
- Congestive heart failure
- Cirrhosis
- Cancer
- End-stage dementia
- Renal failure
- Any patient 70 + admitted to the hospital from the community because of an acute medical or surgical condition.
- Any patient 55 - 69 years of age admitted to the hospital, who has high likelihood of death in the next 6 months, in the opinion of the treating physician.
Exclusion Criteria:
- People who are not hospitalized or do not have family members that are hospitalized and are not a potential user of the eLSDA.
Studieplan
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Sundhedstjenesteforskning
- Tildeling: Randomiseret
- Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
- Maskning: Dobbelt
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentel: Intervention
Patient/family are randomized to either the active intervention (web based life support patient decision aid - eLSDA and decision coaching) or usual care comparison.
|
The web-based life support decision aid (eLSDA) was adapted from a print-based decision aid.
The eLSDA includes information on the pros and cons of both life support and comfort care.
The eLSDA lays out the decision about life support for an individual patient/family in a logical stepwise fashion to permit discussion, ask questions, and permit reflection on each step.
At the end of the eLSDA, unmet decision-making needs are identified to seek support from the healthcare team.
Andre navne:
During the interactive process of using the eLSDA, the study nurse provides decision coaching for patient/family, specifically a facilitated values clarification exercise.
Andre navne:
|
|
Ingen indgriben: Usual Care Comparison
Patients may also randomized to review current web based resources provided by the health region for seriously ill patients.
|
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability & Usability of the eLSDA
Tidsramme: up to 15 minutes
|
The acceptability and usability is assessed by conducting an Acceptability Survey which asks participants 8 validated questions about the use, amount of information, length, clarity, balance in presentation, willingness to recommend to others and overall suitability for decision making.
The intervention will be considered acceptable if score of the acceptability survey exceeds 80%.
|
up to 15 minutes
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Knowledge about life-sustaining technologies
Tidsramme: up to 15 minutes
|
This knowledge of life-sustaining technologies will be measured after using the eLSDA using the self-report questionnaire.
The knowledge questionnaire was developed for this study based on the eLSDA to test users' knowledge of life-sustaining technologies.
|
up to 15 minutes
|
|
Clarity of values regarding life-sustaining technologies
Tidsramme: up to 30 minutes
|
The patient's values will be collected in the eLSDA.
|
up to 30 minutes
|
|
Congruence between the documented physician's orders and patient choice
Tidsramme: up to 5 minutes
|
Congruence between documented physician orders and patient choice when participants use the eLSDA and/or based on patient communication during the discussion with their physician will be reported as simple agreement: (Yes/No)
|
up to 5 minutes
|
|
Feasibility of Evaluation Process
Tidsramme: up to 30 minutes
|
The measures of feasibility are established by the rate of completion of the eLSDA, debriefing and study procedures.
The study will be considered feasible if 60% of those approached agreed to participate in the study; >75% of participants discuss the decision about life support during the encounter, <5% of the participants are distressed by the eLSDA, and 80% of participants complete data collection.
|
up to 30 minutes
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Sponsor
Samarbejdspartnere
Efterforskere
- Ledende efterforsker: Jennifer Kryworuchko, PhD RN CNCC, University of British Columbia
- Studieleder: Wanda Martin, PhD RN, University of Saskatchewan
- Studiestol: Donna Goodridge, University of Saskatchewan
- Studiestol: Petrina McGrath, Saskatoon Health Region
- Studiestol: Karen Levesque, Saskatoon Health Region
Publikationer og nyttige links
Generelle publikationer
- Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A, Thomson R, Barratt A, Barry M, Bernstein S, Butow P, Clarke A, Entwistle V, Feldman-Stewart D, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Moumjid N, Mulley A, Ruland C, Sepucha K, Sykes A, Whelan T; International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):417. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
- The Change Foundation. Consumers and Canadian Health Care Trending Analysis 2004. The Change Foundation: Toronto. 2005.
- Heyland DK, Groll D, Rocker G, Dodek P, Gafni A, Tranmer J, Pichora D, Lazar N, Kutsogiannis J, Shortt S, Lam M; Canadian Researchers at the End of Life Network (CARENET). End-of-life care in acute care hospitals in Canada: a quality finish? J Palliat Care. 2005 Autumn;21(3):142-50.
- O'Connor AM, Graham ID, Visser A. Implementing shared decision making in diverse health care systems: the role of patient decision aids. Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jun;57(3):247-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.04.010. No abstract available.
Hjælpsomme links
Datoer for undersøgelser
Studer store datoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)
Studieafslutning (Faktiske)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
Først opslået (Faktiske)
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
Sidst verificeret
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Nøgleord
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- BEH12334
Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)
Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?
IPD-planbeskrivelse
Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .
Kliniske forsøg med Klinisk beslutningstagning
-
Jiawei JiangRekruttering
-
Iaso Maternity Hospital, Athens, GreeceAfsluttet
-
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial...RekrutteringClinical Decision Support SystemTaiwan
-
Medway NHS Foundation TrustAfsluttetClinical Decision Support System (CDSS)Det Forenede Kongerige
-
Beijing Anzhen HospitalAktiv, ikke rekrutterendeAkut myokardieinfarkt | Clinical Decision Support System | Store sprogmodellerKina
-
Prof.dr Carin (C.C.D.) van der RijtNoordwest Ziekenhuisgroep; Rijnstate Hospital; Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam; Laurens... og andre samarbejdspartnereAfsluttetLivskvalitet | Palliativ pleje | Håndtering af medicinterapi | Terminalpleje | Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS)Holland
-
Turkish Ministry of Health Izmir Teaching HospitalUkendtAkut koronarsyndrom | Clinical Decision Support SystemKalkun
-
University of NebraskaAfsluttetBalance Board | Trail Making TaskForenede Stater
-
Beni-Suef UniversityAfsluttetPerception of Clinical Pharmacy PracticeEgypten
-
Keck School of Medicine of USCAIDS Healthcare Foundation; Los Angeles General Medical CenterIkke rekrutterer endnuAntiretroviral terapi, meget aktiv | HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) | Personlig medicin | Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) | AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome) | INDIVIDUALISERET TERAPI | PræcisionsmedicinForenede Stater
Kliniske forsøg med Web based life support patient decision aid
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Afsluttet
-
University of Santo Tomas Hospital, PhilippinesPhilippine Council for Health Research & Development; University of Santo... og andre samarbejdspartnereRekrutteringLokalt avanceret livmoderhalskræftFilippinerne
-
Servicio Canario de SaludHospital Universitario de Canarias; Fundación Canaria de Investigación... og andre samarbejdspartnereAfsluttetSlidgigt | HofteartroseSpanien
-
Unity Health TorontoUkendt
-
St. Martin De Porress HospitalRekruttering
-
Tampere UniversityTurku University Hospital; Helsinki University Central Hospital; Oulu University... og andre samarbejdspartnereAktiv, ikke rekrutterendeDupuytren KontrakturFinland