- ICH GCP
- Amerikanska kliniska prövningsregistret
- Klinisk prövning NCT03271658
Mixed Methods Study Web-based Life Support Decision Aid (eLSDA)
Development of an Individualized, Web-Based Life Support Decision Aid (eLSDA) Concerning Goals of Care for the Seriously Ill Patient
Studieöversikt
Status
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Detaljerad beskrivning
A concurrent mixed method study of a life support decision aid (eLSDA) intends to prepare hospitalized, seriously ill older adult patients and their families to participate in shared decision-making. The study includes 1) randomized controlled trial and 2) a qualitative (naturalistic observation) study. The experimental study compares a convenience cohort of participants who receive usual care (n=60 patients or patient/surrogate pairs) to a cohort of participants who receive the intervention (n=60 patients or patient/surrogate pairs). The investigators intend to measure a) knowledge of life-sustaining technologies, b) clarity of values, c) congruence between documented physician's orders and patient choice, d) decisional conflict, and e) quality of communication. For the intervention group only, investigators will measure comprehensibility and acceptability of the eLSDA. The observational qualitative study derived from naturalistic observation will involve participant observation to examine dialogue about life support between hospitalized, seriously ill older adult patients, families and their healthcare professionals. Quantitative and qualitative data will be collected to better understand the comprehensibility, acceptability, usability, feasibility and impact of the eLSDA used in routine clinical practice.
Questionnaires, patient/family/physician discussions and web based tool viewing will be completed in a hospital setting. The investigator will administer pre-intervention questionnaires to the participants, which will take approximately 15 minutes. Participants will then be randomized to groups, and be invited to use the web based eLSDA or usual care materials on a laptop computer or tablet (30 minutes). This will be followed by post-intervention questionnaires in a second interview (15 minutes). Physicians and nurses/social workers will be asked to complete a survey to examine the barriers to discussions about goals of care (15 minutes). The investigator will also fill out the chart abstraction tool after the participants give consent.
Studietyp
Inskrivning (Faktisk)
Fas
- Inte tillämpbar
Kontakter och platser
Studieorter
-
-
Saskatchewan
-
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Kanada, S7N 0W8
- Royal University Hospital
-
-
Deltagandekriterier
Urvalskriterier
Åldrar som är berättigade till studier
Tar emot friska volontärer
Kön som är behöriga för studier
Beskrivning
Inclusion Criteria:
- Potential users of eLSDA, which are those who are hospitalized, seriously ill, older patients, their families, and their health care providers.
Age 55 + with one or more of the following diseases:
- Chronic obstructive lung disease
- Congestive heart failure
- Cirrhosis
- Cancer
- End-stage dementia
- Renal failure
- Any patient 70 + admitted to the hospital from the community because of an acute medical or surgical condition.
- Any patient 55 - 69 years of age admitted to the hospital, who has high likelihood of death in the next 6 months, in the opinion of the treating physician.
Exclusion Criteria:
- People who are not hospitalized or do not have family members that are hospitalized and are not a potential user of the eLSDA.
Studieplan
Hur är studien utformad?
Designdetaljer
- Primärt syfte: Hälsovårdsforskning
- Tilldelning: Randomiserad
- Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
- Maskning: Dubbel
Vapen och interventioner
Deltagargrupp / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Experimentell: Intervention
Patient/family are randomized to either the active intervention (web based life support patient decision aid - eLSDA and decision coaching) or usual care comparison.
|
The web-based life support decision aid (eLSDA) was adapted from a print-based decision aid.
The eLSDA includes information on the pros and cons of both life support and comfort care.
The eLSDA lays out the decision about life support for an individual patient/family in a logical stepwise fashion to permit discussion, ask questions, and permit reflection on each step.
At the end of the eLSDA, unmet decision-making needs are identified to seek support from the healthcare team.
Andra namn:
During the interactive process of using the eLSDA, the study nurse provides decision coaching for patient/family, specifically a facilitated values clarification exercise.
Andra namn:
|
|
Inget ingripande: Usual Care Comparison
Patients may also randomized to review current web based resources provided by the health region for seriously ill patients.
|
Vad mäter studien?
Primära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability & Usability of the eLSDA
Tidsram: up to 15 minutes
|
The acceptability and usability is assessed by conducting an Acceptability Survey which asks participants 8 validated questions about the use, amount of information, length, clarity, balance in presentation, willingness to recommend to others and overall suitability for decision making.
The intervention will be considered acceptable if score of the acceptability survey exceeds 80%.
|
up to 15 minutes
|
Sekundära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Knowledge about life-sustaining technologies
Tidsram: up to 15 minutes
|
This knowledge of life-sustaining technologies will be measured after using the eLSDA using the self-report questionnaire.
The knowledge questionnaire was developed for this study based on the eLSDA to test users' knowledge of life-sustaining technologies.
|
up to 15 minutes
|
|
Clarity of values regarding life-sustaining technologies
Tidsram: up to 30 minutes
|
The patient's values will be collected in the eLSDA.
|
up to 30 minutes
|
|
Congruence between the documented physician's orders and patient choice
Tidsram: up to 5 minutes
|
Congruence between documented physician orders and patient choice when participants use the eLSDA and/or based on patient communication during the discussion with their physician will be reported as simple agreement: (Yes/No)
|
up to 5 minutes
|
|
Feasibility of Evaluation Process
Tidsram: up to 30 minutes
|
The measures of feasibility are established by the rate of completion of the eLSDA, debriefing and study procedures.
The study will be considered feasible if 60% of those approached agreed to participate in the study; >75% of participants discuss the decision about life support during the encounter, <5% of the participants are distressed by the eLSDA, and 80% of participants complete data collection.
|
up to 30 minutes
|
Samarbetspartners och utredare
Sponsor
Samarbetspartners
Utredare
- Huvudutredare: Jennifer Kryworuchko, PhD RN CNCC, University of British Columbia
- Studierektor: Wanda Martin, PhD RN, University of Saskatchewan
- Studiestol: Donna Goodridge, University of Saskatchewan
- Studiestol: Petrina McGrath, Saskatoon Health Region
- Studiestol: Karen Levesque, Saskatoon Health Region
Publikationer och användbara länkar
Allmänna publikationer
- Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A, Thomson R, Barratt A, Barry M, Bernstein S, Butow P, Clarke A, Entwistle V, Feldman-Stewart D, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Moumjid N, Mulley A, Ruland C, Sepucha K, Sykes A, Whelan T; International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):417. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
- The Change Foundation. Consumers and Canadian Health Care Trending Analysis 2004. The Change Foundation: Toronto. 2005.
- Heyland DK, Groll D, Rocker G, Dodek P, Gafni A, Tranmer J, Pichora D, Lazar N, Kutsogiannis J, Shortt S, Lam M; Canadian Researchers at the End of Life Network (CARENET). End-of-life care in acute care hospitals in Canada: a quality finish? J Palliat Care. 2005 Autumn;21(3):142-50.
- O'Connor AM, Graham ID, Visser A. Implementing shared decision making in diverse health care systems: the role of patient decision aids. Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jun;57(3):247-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.04.010. No abstract available.
Användbara länkar
Studieavstämningsdatum
Studera stora datum
Studiestart (Faktisk)
Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)
Avslutad studie (Faktisk)
Studieregistreringsdatum
Först inskickad
Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
Första postat (Faktisk)
Uppdateringar av studier
Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)
Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
Senast verifierad
Mer information
Termer relaterade till denna studie
Nyckelord
Andra studie-ID-nummer
- BEH12334
Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)
Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?
IPD-planbeskrivning
Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument
Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt
Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt
Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .
Kliniska prövningar på Kliniskt beslutsfattande
-
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial...RekryteringClinical Decision Support SystemTaiwan
-
Jiawei JiangRekrytering
-
Iaso Maternity Hospital, Athens, GreeceAvslutad
-
Medway NHS Foundation TrustAvslutadClinical Decision Support System (CDSS)Storbritannien
-
University Hospital AugsburgErasmus Medical Center; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein; Johannes...Avslutad
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalOkändClinical Decision Support Systems | Ambulatory Care Information SystemsFörenta staterna
-
Beijing Anzhen HospitalAktiv, inte rekryterandeAkut hjärtinfarkt | Clinical Decision Support System | Stora språkmodellerKina
-
Wuerzburg University HospitalCharite University, Berlin, Germany; Goethe University; RWTH Aachen University och andra samarbetspartnersAvslutadKirurgi | ASA klass III/IV patienter | Clinical Decision Support SystemsTyskland
-
Prof.dr Carin (C.C.D.) van der RijtNoordwest Ziekenhuisgroep; Rijnstate Hospital; Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam; Laurens... och andra samarbetspartnersAvslutadLivskvalité | Palliativ vård | Läkemedelsterapihantering | Terminalvård | Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS)Nederländerna
-
University of California, Los AngelesLAC+USC Medical Center; Los Angeles Department of Health Services; American...AvslutadMRI | Ryggont | Datortomografi | Röntgenstrålar | Clinical Decision Support Tool
Kliniska prövningar på Web based life support patient decision aid
-
Servicio Canario de SaludHospital Universitario de Canarias; Fundación Canaria de Investigación... och andra samarbetspartnersAvslutadArtros | HöftartrosSpanien
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Avslutad
-
Unity Health TorontoOkänd
-
Technische Universität DresdenDipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate, University... och andra samarbetspartnersRekryteringMekanisk ventilation | IntensivvårdsmedicinTyskland, Italien, Spanien, Polen
-
Stanford UniversityNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); University of California... och andra samarbetspartnersRekryteringHjärtsvikt och reducerad utstötningsfraktionFörenta staterna