- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk utprøving NCT03271658
Mixed Methods Study Web-based Life Support Decision Aid (eLSDA)
Development of an Individualized, Web-Based Life Support Decision Aid (eLSDA) Concerning Goals of Care for the Seriously Ill Patient
Studieoversikt
Status
Forhold
Intervensjon / Behandling
Detaljert beskrivelse
A concurrent mixed method study of a life support decision aid (eLSDA) intends to prepare hospitalized, seriously ill older adult patients and their families to participate in shared decision-making. The study includes 1) randomized controlled trial and 2) a qualitative (naturalistic observation) study. The experimental study compares a convenience cohort of participants who receive usual care (n=60 patients or patient/surrogate pairs) to a cohort of participants who receive the intervention (n=60 patients or patient/surrogate pairs). The investigators intend to measure a) knowledge of life-sustaining technologies, b) clarity of values, c) congruence between documented physician's orders and patient choice, d) decisional conflict, and e) quality of communication. For the intervention group only, investigators will measure comprehensibility and acceptability of the eLSDA. The observational qualitative study derived from naturalistic observation will involve participant observation to examine dialogue about life support between hospitalized, seriously ill older adult patients, families and their healthcare professionals. Quantitative and qualitative data will be collected to better understand the comprehensibility, acceptability, usability, feasibility and impact of the eLSDA used in routine clinical practice.
Questionnaires, patient/family/physician discussions and web based tool viewing will be completed in a hospital setting. The investigator will administer pre-intervention questionnaires to the participants, which will take approximately 15 minutes. Participants will then be randomized to groups, and be invited to use the web based eLSDA or usual care materials on a laptop computer or tablet (30 minutes). This will be followed by post-intervention questionnaires in a second interview (15 minutes). Physicians and nurses/social workers will be asked to complete a survey to examine the barriers to discussions about goals of care (15 minutes). The investigator will also fill out the chart abstraction tool after the participants give consent.
Studietype
Registrering (Faktiske)
Fase
- Ikke aktuelt
Kontakter og plasseringer
Studiesteder
-
-
Saskatchewan
-
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, S7N 0W8
- Royal University Hospital
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
Tar imot friske frivillige
Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Potential users of eLSDA, which are those who are hospitalized, seriously ill, older patients, their families, and their health care providers.
Age 55 + with one or more of the following diseases:
- Chronic obstructive lung disease
- Congestive heart failure
- Cirrhosis
- Cancer
- End-stage dementia
- Renal failure
- Any patient 70 + admitted to the hospital from the community because of an acute medical or surgical condition.
- Any patient 55 - 69 years of age admitted to the hospital, who has high likelihood of death in the next 6 months, in the opinion of the treating physician.
Exclusion Criteria:
- People who are not hospitalized or do not have family members that are hospitalized and are not a potential user of the eLSDA.
Studieplan
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Helsetjenesteforskning
- Tildeling: Randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
- Masking: Dobbelt
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
---|---|
Eksperimentell: Intervention
Patient/family are randomized to either the active intervention (web based life support patient decision aid - eLSDA and decision coaching) or usual care comparison.
|
The web-based life support decision aid (eLSDA) was adapted from a print-based decision aid.
The eLSDA includes information on the pros and cons of both life support and comfort care.
The eLSDA lays out the decision about life support for an individual patient/family in a logical stepwise fashion to permit discussion, ask questions, and permit reflection on each step.
At the end of the eLSDA, unmet decision-making needs are identified to seek support from the healthcare team.
Andre navn:
During the interactive process of using the eLSDA, the study nurse provides decision coaching for patient/family, specifically a facilitated values clarification exercise.
Andre navn:
|
Ingen inngripen: Usual Care Comparison
Patients may also randomized to review current web based resources provided by the health region for seriously ill patients.
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
---|---|---|
Acceptability & Usability of the eLSDA
Tidsramme: up to 15 minutes
|
The acceptability and usability is assessed by conducting an Acceptability Survey which asks participants 8 validated questions about the use, amount of information, length, clarity, balance in presentation, willingness to recommend to others and overall suitability for decision making.
The intervention will be considered acceptable if score of the acceptability survey exceeds 80%.
|
up to 15 minutes
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
---|---|---|
Knowledge about life-sustaining technologies
Tidsramme: up to 15 minutes
|
This knowledge of life-sustaining technologies will be measured after using the eLSDA using the self-report questionnaire.
The knowledge questionnaire was developed for this study based on the eLSDA to test users' knowledge of life-sustaining technologies.
|
up to 15 minutes
|
Clarity of values regarding life-sustaining technologies
Tidsramme: up to 30 minutes
|
The patient's values will be collected in the eLSDA.
|
up to 30 minutes
|
Congruence between the documented physician's orders and patient choice
Tidsramme: up to 5 minutes
|
Congruence between documented physician orders and patient choice when participants use the eLSDA and/or based on patient communication during the discussion with their physician will be reported as simple agreement: (Yes/No)
|
up to 5 minutes
|
Feasibility of Evaluation Process
Tidsramme: up to 30 minutes
|
The measures of feasibility are established by the rate of completion of the eLSDA, debriefing and study procedures.
The study will be considered feasible if 60% of those approached agreed to participate in the study; >75% of participants discuss the decision about life support during the encounter, <5% of the participants are distressed by the eLSDA, and 80% of participants complete data collection.
|
up to 30 minutes
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Sponsor
Samarbeidspartnere
Etterforskere
- Hovedetterforsker: Jennifer Kryworuchko, PhD RN CNCC, University of British Columbia
- Studieleder: Wanda Martin, PhD RN, University of Saskatchewan
- Studiestol: Donna Goodridge, University of Saskatchewan
- Studiestol: Petrina McGrath, Saskatoon Health Region
- Studiestol: Karen Levesque, Saskatoon Health Region
Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker
Generelle publikasjoner
- Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A, Thomson R, Barratt A, Barry M, Bernstein S, Butow P, Clarke A, Entwistle V, Feldman-Stewart D, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Moumjid N, Mulley A, Ruland C, Sepucha K, Sykes A, Whelan T; International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):417. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
- The Change Foundation. Consumers and Canadian Health Care Trending Analysis 2004. The Change Foundation: Toronto. 2005.
- Heyland DK, Groll D, Rocker G, Dodek P, Gafni A, Tranmer J, Pichora D, Lazar N, Kutsogiannis J, Shortt S, Lam M; Canadian Researchers at the End of Life Network (CARENET). End-of-life care in acute care hospitals in Canada: a quality finish? J Palliat Care. 2005 Autumn;21(3):142-50.
- O'Connor AM, Graham ID, Visser A. Implementing shared decision making in diverse health care systems: the role of patient decision aids. Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jun;57(3):247-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.04.010. No abstract available.
Hjelpsomme linker
Studierekorddatoer
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
Primær fullføring (Faktiske)
Studiet fullført (Faktiske)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Sist bekreftet
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Nøkkelord
Andre studie-ID-numre
- BEH12334
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
IPD-planbeskrivelse
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .
Kliniske studier på Klinisk beslutningstaking
-
Iaso Maternity Hospital, Athens, GreeceFullført
-
University Hospital AugsburgErasmus Medical Center; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein; Johannes...Har ikke rekruttert ennåClinical Decision Support Systems
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalUkjentClinical Decision Support Systems | Ambulatory Care Information SystemsForente stater
-
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial...RekrutteringClinical Decision Support SystemTaiwan
-
Wuerzburg University HospitalCharite University, Berlin, Germany; Goethe University; RWTH Aachen University og andre samarbeidspartnereRekrutteringKirurgi | ASA klasse III/IV pasienter | Clinical Decision Support SystemsTyskland
-
Prof.dr Carin (C.C.D.) van der RijtNoordwest Ziekenhuisgroep; Rijnstate Hospital; Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam; Laurens... og andre samarbeidspartnereRekrutteringLivskvalitet | Palliativ omsorg | Behandling av medisiner | Terminal Care | Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS)Nederland
-
Navy General Hospital, BeijingHar ikke rekruttert ennåVenøs tromboembolisme | Clinical Decision Support Systems | Digital helse
-
Columbia UniversityPåmelding etter invitasjonSepsis | Elektroniske helsejournaler | Clinical Decision Support SystemsForente stater
-
Columbia UniversityPåmelding etter invitasjonSepsis | Elektroniske helsejournaler | Clinical Decision Support SystemsForente stater
-
Jordi Gol i Gurina FoundationInstitut Català de la Salut; Department of Health, Generalitat de CatalunyaUkjentAtrieflimmer | Antikoagulanter | Clinical Decision Support SystemsSpania
Kliniske studier på Web based life support patient decision aid
-
NYU Langone HealthRekruttering
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)Har ikke rekruttert ennåPrediabetes | Livsstil, sunn | Aktivering, pasient