Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Real Time MRI Fused to Cone Beam CT Guided Biopsies of the Prostate.

2. december 2019 opdateret af: Dr. Jason Izard, Department of Urology, Queen's University

Real Time MRI Fused to Cone Beam CT Guided Biopsies of the Prostate: The Safety and Feasibility of a Novel Method of Prostate Biopsy.

The purpose of this study is to investigate a novel method of prostate biopsy using a computerized guidance system to accurately target lesions within the prostate. This method of prostate biopsy involves using a computerized technology that permits a lesion detected on MRI to be projected by a computer into 3 dimensions on a patient's CT scan. A CT guided biopsy can then be performed where a needle is advanced into the patient, where the computer has projected the image of the tumor that cannot normally be seen on CT. This is a randomized, cross over designed trial to compare this new method of prostate biopsy to the currently employed standard transrectal ultrasound guided prostate (TRUSP) biopsy technique.

Studieoversigt

Status

Ukendt

Betingelser

Detaljeret beskrivelse

This will be a prospective randomized controlled trial using a cross over design. Patients will serve as their own controls and undergo both TRUSP biopsy (standard of care) and mpMRI fused to cone beam CT guided biopsy of the prostate. The procedures and recovery will follow the identical standardized care pathway that is currently used for TRUSP biopsies. A total of 20 patients will be recruited

Patients will be randomized to receive either TRUSP biopsy or cone beam CT guided biopsy first, followed by the alternative procedure. Following the initial biopsy procedure the patients will fill out a short pain score. They will then recover in the radiology suite for a period of one hour. Following a one hour recovery period the patient will subsequently undergo the alternative biopsy procedure. They will then fill out a second pain score with two additional questions asking the patient to compare the two biopsy approaches with respect to comfort and preference using a 7 point Likert scale. Specimens will be sent to pathology separately to detect differences in diagnostic yield between the two biopsy approaches. In order to minimize inter-operator variability in outcomes, Dr. Menard will perform all biopsies regardless of approach.

An interim analysis after 10 patients will be performed. The study will be terminated early if:

  1. No TRUSP biopsy detects any form of prostate cancer
  2. No cone beam CT guided biopsy detects any form of prostate cancer.
  3. Average pain scores between biopsy approaches differ by more than 4 points on the Universal Pain Assessment scale.
  4. 3 or more patients suffer any of:

    1. Immediate procedure related complications
    2. 30 day return to the emergency room
    3. 30 day hospital admission

Measures

Feasibility:

Patients will be considered to have clinically significant prostate cancer based on their PI-RADS score 4 or 5. The ability of TRUSP biopsy and cone beam CT guided biopsy to detect any form of prostate cancer as well as clinically significant prostate cancer (defined as prostate cancer with a Gleason score ≥7) will serve as the primary outcome measures.

Safety:

Immediate procedure related complications, 30 day return to the ER and 30 day hospital admission rates will be recorded. Immediate procedure related complications will be documented at the time of the procedure. The 30 day return to the ER and hospital admission rates will be documented at the participant's followup appointment. Complication rates will reflect the total combined complication rate. This can be compared against the known Ontario province rates to ensure that the addition of cone beam CT guided biopsy does not provide for additive morbidity.

Tolerability:

Patients will fill out the Universal Pain Assessment Tool after each procedure. After both procedures are completed, patients will fill out two questions utilizing a 7 point Likert scale on preference and comfort between the two biopsy approaches.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Forventet)

20

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

    • Ontario
      • Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 2V7
        • Rekruttering
        • Kingston Health Sciences Centre
        • Kontakt:

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Han

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants will be eligible for enrollment if they have both of:

    1. Lesion in the prostate on mpMRI that is highly likely to be clinically significant prostate cancer based on the PI-RADS version 2 score (PI-RADS score of 4 or 5).
    2. A previous negative TRUSP biopsy or previous TRUSP biopsy showing atypical small acinar proliferation, high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or low volume Gleason 6 disease (low risk disease) all of which are incongruent with the high PI-RADS score of the mpMRI lesion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Uncorrected coagulopathy.
  2. Active, untreated urinary tract infection.
  3. Inability to access the rectum in order to perform TRUSP biopsy.

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Diagnostisk
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Crossover opgave
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: CT Fusion Biopsy + Transrectal U/S Guided Prostate Biopsy
All patients will receive both a CT fusion biopsy and a standard TRUSP biopsy. They will be randomized to which is received first, followed by receipt of the alternative procedure.
All patients will receive both a CT fusion biopsy and a standard TRUSP biopsy. They will be randomized to which is received first, followed by receipt of the alternative procedure.
Andet: Transrectal U/S Guided Prostate Biopsy + CT Fusion Biopsy
All patients will receive both a CT fusion biopsy and a standard TRUSP biopsy. They will be randomized to which is received first, followed by receipt of the alternative procedure.
All patients will receive both a CT fusion biopsy and a standard TRUSP biopsy. They will be randomized to which is received first, followed by receipt of the alternative procedure.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Accuracy of CT fusion biopsy [number of biopsies that show clinically significant prostate cancer]
Tidsramme: Day 0
Patients will be considered to have clinically significant prostate cancer based on their PI-RADS score 4 or 5. The ability of TRUSP biopsy and cone beam CT guided biopsy to detect any form of prostate cancer as well as clinically significant prostate cancer (defined as prostate cancer with a Gleason score ≥7) will serve as the primary outcome measures.
Day 0

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]).
Tidsramme: 0 Day and at 30 day
Immediate procedure related complications will be documented at the time of procedures. The 30 day return to the ER and hospital admission rates will be documented at the participant's following appointment.
0 Day and at 30 day
Tolerability of CT fusion biopsy
Tidsramme: Day 0
Patients will fill out the 0-10 point Universal Pain Assessment Tool after each procedure where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible. After both procedures are completed, patients will also fill out two questions utilizing a 1-7 point Likert scale on preference and comfort between the two biopsy approaches where 1 represents rectum biopsy and 7 represents buttock muscle biopsy.
Day 0

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

6. november 2019

Primær færdiggørelse (Forventet)

1. juli 2020

Studieafslutning (Forventet)

1. august 2020

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

20. november 2019

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

25. november 2019

Først opslået (Faktiske)

27. november 2019

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

4. december 2019

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

2. december 2019

Sidst verificeret

1. december 2019

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med CT Fusion + Transrectal U/S Guided Prostate Biopsy

Abonner