Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Comparison of the BOPPPS Model and Traditional Instructional Method in Medicinal Chemistry Education

11. august 2026 opdateret af: Liang Qi, Jiangsu Medical College

Comparison of the BOPPPS Model and Traditional Instructional Method in Medicinal Chemistry Education for Pharmacy Students

This study aims to compare the teaching effect of the BOPPPS teaching model and the traditional lecture-based teaching method in Medicinal Chemistry courses for pharmacy students. Two groups of students receiving different teaching strategies will be included in this retrospective controlled study. The primary evaluation indicators include students' final examination scores, and secondary indicators cover classroom learning engagement and student satisfaction questionnaires. The overall objective is to explore whether the BOPPPS model can improve students' learning performance and learning experience in Medicinal Chemistry teaching. No human clinical intervention or invasive testing is involved in this educational research.

Studieoversigt

Detaljeret beskrivelse

This educational controlled study focuses on the teaching reform of Medicinal Chemistry, a core compulsory course for pharmacy majors in higher vocational colleges. Traditional lecture-centered teaching is widely adopted in vocational pharmacy teaching, which often leads to insufficient student participation, weak initiative in classroom interaction, and unsatisfactory learning efficiency for complex pharmaceutical chemical structures and synthetic reactions.The BOPPPS teaching model divides each class into six standardized links: Bridge-in, Objectives, Pre-assessment, Participatory learning, Post-assessment, Summary. This student-centered teaching design strengthens classroom interaction and targeted detection of learning effects. At present, there is limited comparative research on the application of this model in Medicinal Chemistry teaching for vocational pharmacy students.This retrospective controlled research collects historical teaching data of two student groups receiving different teaching modes. The research intends to systematically analyze the differences in learning outcomes between the two teaching strategies, so as to provide practical teaching reform references for Medicinal Chemistry courses in vocational pharmacy education. This study only adopts routine classroom teaching and anonymous questionnaire surveys, without any clinical medical intervention, blood sampling or physical examination on participants. All student data are anonymized to protect personal privacy. Article 32 of the Notice on Printing and Distributing the Measures for Ethical Review of Life Science and Medical Research Involving Humans, jointly issued by the National Health Commission of China, the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Science and Technology, and the National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, stipulates that "Life science and medical research involving humans that uses human information, data or biological samples may be exempt from ethical review if such research falls under the circumstances specified below, causes no physical harm to human participants, and does not involve sensitive personal information or commercial interests." As a study focusing on teaching effectiveness, the present research qualifies for an exemption from ethical review pursuant to this provision.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

60

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

    • Jiangsu
      • Yancheng, Jiangsu, Kina, 224005
        • Jiangsu Medical College

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Barn
  • Voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ja

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Full-time pharmacy students without previous Medicinal Chemistry learning experience
  • Complete all academic assessments and anonymous questionnaire surveys

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Classroom attendance rate less than 80%
  • Students who are unwilling to provide relevant data for this educational study or miss the final exam

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Andet
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Experimental Group (BOPPPS Teaching Model)
Pharmacy students receive Medicinal Chemistry courses adopting the complete six-link BOPPPS teaching design, including Bridge-in, Objectives, Pre-assessment, Participatory learning, Post-assessment and Summary. Interactive classroom activities and in-class tests are arranged in each lesson.
Medicinal Chemistry teaching based on BOPPPS model, consisting of Bridge-in, Objectives, Pre-assessment, Participatory learning, Post-assessment and Summary sessions with abundant classroom interaction.
Aktiv komparator: Control Group (Traditional Lecture Teaching)
Pharmacy students receive teacher-centered traditional lecture-based Medicinal Chemistry teaching. The teacher explains knowledge points directly, with few classroom interactive sessions.
Traditional teacher-centered lecture teaching for Medicinal Chemistry, mainly knowledge explanation, without segmented pre-assessment and post-assessment arrangements.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Final examination scores of Medicinal Chemistry
Tidsramme: At the completion of the teaching intervention, up to 1 week
Final exam scores to evaluate students' mastery of professional knowledge of Medicinal Chemistry. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better academic performance.
At the completion of the teaching intervention, up to 1 week

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Student teaching satisfaction score
Tidsramme: At the completion of the teaching intervention, up to 1 week
Score from an anonymous questionnaire evaluating students' satisfaction with the classroom teaching model. The total score ranges from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction.
At the completion of the teaching intervention, up to 1 week

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Liang Qi, PhD, Jiangsu Medical College

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

15. september 2025

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

6. januar 2026

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

8. januar 2026

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

6. august 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

11. august 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

17. august 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

17. august 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

11. august 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. august 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • JiangsuMC-20260806
  • 2025JGYB272 (Andet bevillings-/finansieringsnummer: Jiangsu Society of Higher Education)

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

JA

IPD-planbeskrivelse

De-identified individual participant-level data supporting this study, together with a complete data dictionary, will be accessible to qualified external researchers upon reasonable written request after the primary manuscript is published. Data release is conditional on institutional and regulatory privacy authorization. All formal data access requests should be submitted to the corresponding author for evaluation and review. No identifiable personal information will be included in shared datasets to protect student privacy.

IPD-delingstidsramme

De-identified individual participant data and supporting documents will be available to qualified researchers indefinitely after the publication of the primary study manuscript.

IPD-delingsadgangskriterier

Data and supporting documents are available only to qualified academic researchers with legitimate educational research objectives. All applicants shall submit a formal written research request to the corresponding author. Data release is subject to institutional privacy and regulatory authorization. Applicants must provide a clear research plan and agree to use the shared de-identified data solely for independent academic research, without attempting to re-identify participants or share datasets with third parties.

IPD-deling Understøttende informationstype

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner