Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Versus Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema (IVT)

25. August 2016 aktualisiert von: Jaeb Center for Health Research

A Randomized Trial Comparing Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide and Laser Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema

The study involves the enrollment of patients over 18 years of age with diabetic macular edema(DME). Patients with one study eye will be randomly assigned (stratified by visual acuity and prior laser) with equal probability to one of the three treatment groups:

  1. Laser photocoagulation
  2. 1mg intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection
  3. 4mg intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection

For patients with two study eyes (both eyes eligible at the time of randomization), the right eye (stratified by visual acuity and prior laser) will be randomly assigned with equal probabilities to one of the three treatment groups listed above. The left eye will be assigned to the alternative treatment (laser or triamcinolone). If the left eye is assigned to triamcinolone, then the dose (1mg or 4 mg) will be randomly assigned to the left eye with equal probability (stratified by visual acuity and prior laser).

The study drug, triamcinolone acetonide, has been manufactured as a sterile intravitreal injectable by Allergan. Study eyes assigned to an intravitreal triamcinolone injection will receive a dose of either 1mg or 4mg. There is no indication of which treatment regimen will be better.

Patients enrolled into the study will be followed for three years and will have study visits every 4 months after receiving their assigned study treatment. In addition, standard of care post-treatment visits will be performed at 4 weeks after each intravitreal injection.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Diabetic retinopathy is a major cause of visual impairment in the United States. Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a manifestation of diabetic retinopathy that produces loss of central vision. Data from the Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy (WESDR) estimate that after 15 years of known diabetes, the prevalence of diabetic macular edema is approximately 20% in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM), 25% in patients with type 2 DM who are taking insulin, and 14% in patients with type 2 DM who do not take insulin.

In a review of three early studies concerning the natural history of diabetic macular edema, Ferris and Patz found that 53% of 135 eyes with diabetic macular edema, presumably all involving the center of the macula, lost two or more lines of visual acuity over a two year period. In the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), 33% of 221 untreated eyes available for follow-up at the 3-year visit, all with edema involving the center of the macula at baseline, had experienced a 15 or more letter decrease in visual acuity score (equivalent to a doubling of the visual angle, e.g., 20/25 to 20/50, and termed "moderate visual acuity loss").

In the ETDRS, focal/grid photocoagulation of eyes with clinically significant macular edema (CSME) reduced the risk of moderate visual loss by approximately 50% (from 24% to 12%, three years after initiation of treatment). Therefore, 12% of treated eyes developed moderate visual loss in spite of treatment. Furthermore, approximately 40% of treated eyes that had retinal thickening involving the center of the macula at baseline still had thickening involving the center at 12 months, as did 25% of treated eyes at 36 months.

Although several treatment modalities are currently under investigation, the only demonstrated means to reduce the risk of vision loss from diabetic macular edema are laser photocoagulation, as demonstrated by the ETDRS, and intensive glycemic control, as demonstrated by the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS). In the DCCT, intensive glucose control reduced the risk of onset of diabetic macular edema by 23% compared with conventional treatment. Long-term follow-up of patients in the DCCT show a sustained effect of intensive glucose control, with a 58% risk reduction in the development of diabetic macular edema for the DCCT patients followed in the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study.

The frequency of an unsatisfactory outcome following laser photocoagulation in some eyes with diabetic macular edema has prompted interest in other treatment modalities. One such treatment is pars plana vitrectomy. These studies suggest that vitreomacular traction, or the vitreous itself, may play a role in increased retinal vascular permeability. Removal of the vitreous or relief of mechanical traction with vitrectomy and membrane stripping may be followed by substantial resolution of macular edema and corresponding improvement in visual acuity. However, this treatment may be applicable only to a specific subset of eyes with diabetic macular edema. It also requires a complex surgical intervention with its inherent risks, recovery time, and expense. Other treatment modalities such as pharmacologic therapy with oral protein kinase C inhibitors and antibodies targeted at vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are under investigation. The use of intravitreal corticosteroids is another treatment modality that has generated recent interest.

The optimal dose of corticosteroid to maximize efficacy with minimum side effects is not known. A 4mg dose of Kenalog is principally being used in clinical practice. However, this dose has been used based on feasibility rather than scientific principles.

There is also experience using Kenalog doses of 1mg and 2mg. These doses anecdotally have been reported to reduce the macular edema. There is a rationale for using a dose lower than 4mg. Glucocorticoids bind to glucocorticoid receptors in the cell cytoplasm, and the steroid-receptor complex moves to the nucleus where it regulates gene expression. The steroid-receptor binding occurs with high affinity (low dissociation constant (Kd) which is on the order of 5 to 9 nanomolar). Complete saturation of all the receptors occurs about 20-fold higher levels, i.e., about 100-200 nanomolar. A 4mg dose of triamcinolone yields a final concentration of 7.5 millimolar, or nearly 10,000-fold more than the saturation dose. Thus, the effect of a 1mg dose may be equivalent to that of a 4mg dose, because compared to the 10,000-fold saturation, a 4-fold difference in dose is inconsequential. It is also possible that higher doses of corticosteroid could be less effective than lower doses due to down-regulation of the receptor. The steroid implant studies provide additional justification for evaluating a lower dose, a 0.5mg device which delivers only 0.5 micrograms per day has been observed to have a rapid effect in reducing macular edema.

There has been limited experience using doses greater than 4mg. Jonas' case series reported results using a 25mg dose. However, others have not been able to replicate this dose using the preparation procedure described by Jonas.

In the trial, 4mg and 1mg doses will be evaluated. The former will be used because it is the dose that is currently most commonly used in clinical practice and the latter because there is reasonable evidence for efficacy and the potential for lower risk. Although there is good reason to believe that a 1mg dose will reduce the macular edema, it is possible that the retreatment rate will be higher with this dose compared with 4mg since the latter will remain active in the eye for a longer duration than the former. Insufficient data are available to warrant evaluating a dose higher than 4mg at this time.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

840

Phase

  • Phase 3

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, Vereinigte Staaten, 72205-7199
        • Jones Eye Institute/University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
    • California
      • Baldwin Park, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 91706
        • SCPMG Regional Offices - Kaiser Permanente
      • Beverly Hills, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 90211
        • Retina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group
      • Irvine, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 92697
        • University of California, Irvine
      • Loma Linda, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 92354
        • Loma Linda University Health Care, Dept. of Ophthalmology
      • Los Angeles, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 90033
        • Doheny Eye Institute
      • Los Angeles, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 90095
        • Jules Stein Eye Institute
      • Palm Springs, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 92262
        • Southern California Desert Retina Consultants, MC
      • San Francisco, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 94107
        • West Coast Retina Medical Group, Inc.
      • Santa Ana, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 92705
        • Orange County Retina Medical Group
      • Santa Barbara, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 93103
        • California Retina Consultants
      • Walnut Creek, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 94598
        • Bay Area Retina Associates
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, Vereinigte Staaten, 80204
        • Denver Health Medical Center
      • Louisville, Colorado, Vereinigte Staaten, 80027
        • Eldorado Retina Associates, P.C.
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, Vereinigte Staaten, 06519-1600
        • Connecticut Retina Consultants
      • New Haven, Connecticut, Vereinigte Staaten, 06519
        • Connecticut Retina Consultants
    • Florida
      • Fort Myers, Florida, Vereinigte Staaten, 33912
        • National Ophthalmic Research Institute
      • Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, Vereinigte Staaten, 33334
        • Retina Group of Florida
      • Lakeland, Florida, Vereinigte Staaten, 33805
        • Central Florida Retina Institute
      • Lakeland, Florida, Vereinigte Staaten, 33805
        • Florida Retina Consultants
      • Sarasota, Florida, Vereinigte Staaten, 34239
        • Sarasota Retina Institute
      • Tampa, Florida, Vereinigte Staaten, 33603
        • International Eye Center
    • Georgia
      • Augusta, Georgia, Vereinigte Staaten, 30909
        • Southeast Retina Center, P.C.
    • Hawaii
      • Aiea, Hawaii, Vereinigte Staaten, 96701
        • Retina Consultants of Hawaii, Inc.
      • Honolulu, Hawaii, Vereinigte Staaten, 96813
        • Retina Associates of Hawaii, Inc.
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, Vereinigte Staaten, 60612
        • Rush University Medical Center
      • Chicago, Illinois, Vereinigte Staaten, 60611
        • Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation
      • Joliet, Illinois, Vereinigte Staaten, 60435
        • Illinois Retina Associates
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, Vereinigte Staaten, 46290
        • Raj K. Maturi, M.D., P.C.
      • New Albany, Indiana, Vereinigte Staaten, 47150
        • John-Kenyon American Eye Institute
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, Vereinigte Staaten, 40509-1802
        • Retina and Vitreous Associates of Kentucky
      • Paducah, Kentucky, Vereinigte Staaten, 42001
        • Paducah Retinal Center
    • Maine
      • Bangor, Maine, Vereinigte Staaten, 04401
        • Maine Vitreoretinal Consultants
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, Vereinigte Staaten, 21237
        • Elman Retina Group, P.A.
      • Baltimore, Maryland, Vereinigte Staaten, 21287-9277
        • Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute at Johns Hopkins
      • Greenbelt, Maryland, Vereinigte Staaten, 20770-3502
        • The Retina Group of Washington
      • Salisbury, Maryland, Vereinigte Staaten, 21801
        • Retina Consultants of Delmarva, P.A.
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, Vereinigte Staaten, 02215
        • Joslin Diabetes Center
      • Boston, Massachusetts, Vereinigte Staaten, 02114
        • Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, Vereinigte Staaten, 48202
        • Henry Ford Health System, Dept of Ophthalmology and Eye Care Services
      • Detroit, Michigan, Vereinigte Staaten, 48201-1423
        • Kresge Eye Institute
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, Vereinigte Staaten, 49546
        • Associated Retinal Consultants
      • Royal Oak, Michigan, Vereinigte Staaten, 48073
        • Vision Research Foundation
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, Vereinigte Staaten, 55455
        • University of Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, Vereinigte Staaten, 55404
        • Retina Center, PA
    • Missouri
      • St. Louis, Missouri, Vereinigte Staaten, 63110
        • Barnes Retina Institute
      • St. Louis, Missouri, Vereinigte Staaten, 63104
        • St. Louis University Eye Institute
    • New Jersey
      • Lawrenceville, New Jersey, Vereinigte Staaten, 08648
        • Delaware Valley Retina Associates
    • New York
      • New York, New York, Vereinigte Staaten, 10003
        • The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary/Faculty Eye Practice
      • Rochester, New York, Vereinigte Staaten, 14642
        • University of Rochester
      • Slingerlands, New York, Vereinigte Staaten, 12159
        • Retina Consultants, PLLC
      • Syracuse, New York, Vereinigte Staaten, 13224
        • Retina-Vitreous Surgeons of Central New York, PC
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Vereinigte Staaten, 27599
        • University of North Carolina, Dept. of Ophthalmology
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, Vereinigte Staaten, 28210
        • Charlotte Eye Ear Nose and Throat Assoc, PA
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, Vereinigte Staaten, 28211
        • Horizon Eye Care, PA
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, Vereinigte Staaten, 27157
        • Wake Forest University Eye Center
    • Ohio
      • Beachwood, Ohio, Vereinigte Staaten, 44122
        • Retina Associates of Cleveland, Inc.
      • Cleveland, Ohio, Vereinigte Staaten, 44106
        • Case Western Reserve University
      • Dublin, Ohio, Vereinigte Staaten, 43017
        • OSU Eye Physicians and Surgeons, LLC.
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Vereinigte Staaten, 73104
        • Dean A. McGee Eye Institute
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, Vereinigte Staaten, 97239
        • Casey Eye Institute
      • Portland, Oregon, Vereinigte Staaten, 97210
        • Retina Northwest, PC
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, Vereinigte Staaten, 17033
        • Penn State College of Medicine
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Vereinigte Staaten, 19104
        • University of Pennsylvania Scheie Eye Institute
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, Vereinigte Staaten, 02903
        • Retina Consultants
    • South Carolina
      • Columbia, South Carolina, Vereinigte Staaten, 29223
        • Carolina Retina Center
      • Columbia, South Carolina, Vereinigte Staaten, 29169
        • Palmetto Retina Center
    • South Dakota
      • Rapid City, South Dakota, Vereinigte Staaten, 57701
        • Black Hills Regional Eye Institute
    • Tennessee
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, Vereinigte Staaten, 37909
        • Southeastern Retina Associates, P.C.
      • Nashville, Tennessee, Vereinigte Staaten, 37232
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Abilene, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 79605
        • West Texas Retina Consultants P.A.
      • Arlington, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 76012
        • Texas Retina Associates
      • Austin, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 78705
        • Retina Research Center
      • Dallas, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 75231
        • Texas Retina Associates
      • Galveston, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 77555-1106
        • University of Texas Medical Branch, Dept of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences
      • Houston, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 77030
        • Retina Consultants of Houston, PA
      • Houston, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 77025
        • Retina and Vitreous of Texas
      • Houston, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 77002
        • Charles A. Garcia, PA & Associates
      • Lubbock, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 79424
        • Texas Retina Associates
      • McAllen, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 78503
        • Valley Retina Institute
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, Vereinigte Staaten, 84107
        • Rocky Mountain Retina Consultants
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, Vereinigte Staaten, 98195
        • University of Washington Medical Center
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, Vereinigte Staaten, 53705
        • University of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept. of Ophthalmology
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Vereinigte Staaten, 53226
        • Medical College of Wiconsin

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

To be eligible, the following inclusion criteria must be met:

  1. Age ≥18 years
  2. Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2)
  3. Able and willing to provide informed consent.
  4. Patient understands that (1) if both eyes are eligible at the time of randomization, one eye will receive intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and one eye will receive laser, and (2) if only one eye is eligible at the time of randomization and the fellow eye develops DME later, then the fellow eye will not receive intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide if the study eye received intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (however, if the study eye was assigned to the laser group, then the fellow eye may be treated with the 4mg dose of the study intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide formulation, provided the eye assigned to laser has not received an intravitreal injection; such an eye will not be a "study eye" but since it is receiving study drug, it will be followed for adverse effects).

Exclusion Criteria

A patient is not eligible if any of the following exclusion criteria are present:

7. History of chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplant.

8. A condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure and glycemic control). Note: Patients in poor glycemic control who, within the last 4 months, initiated intensive insulin treatment (a pump or multiple daily injections) or plan to do so in the next 4 months should not be enrolled.

9. Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days of study entry that involved treatment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval at the time of study entry.

10. Known allergy to any corticosteroid or any component of the delivery vehicle.

11. History of systemic (e.g., oral, IV, IM, epidural, bursal) corticosteroids within 4 months prior to randomization or topical, rectal, or inhaled corticosteroids in current use more than 2 times per week.

12. Patient is expecting to move out of the area of the clinical center to an area not covered by another clinical center during the 3 years of the study.

13. Blood pressure > 180/110 (systolic above 180 OR diastolic above 110). Note: If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, patient can become eligible.

Study Eye Eligibility

Inclusion

  1. Best corrected Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (e-ETDRS) visual acuity score of ≥ 24 letters (i.e., 20/320 or better) and ≤73 letters (i.e., 20/40 or worse).
  2. Definite retinal thickening due to diabetic macular edema based on clinical exam involving the center of the macula.
  3. Mean retinal thickness on two Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) measurements ≥250 microns in the central subfield.
  4. Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and patient cooperation sufficient for adequate fundus photographs.

    Exclusion

  5. Macular edema is considered to be due to a cause other than diabetic macular edema.
  6. An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigmentary changes, dense subfoveal hard exudates, nonretinal condition).
  7. An ocular condition is present (other than diabetes) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, Irvine-Gass Syndrome, etc.)
  8. Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by 3 lines or more (i.e., cataract would be reducing acuity to 20/40 or worse if eye was otherwise normal).
  9. History of prior treatment with intravitreal corticosteroids.
  10. History of peribulbar steroid injection within 6 months prior to randomization.
  11. History of focal/grid macular photocoagulation within 15 weeks (3.5 months) prior to randomization.Note: Patients are not required to have had prior macular photocoagulation to be enrolled. If prior macular photocoagulation has been performed, the investigator should believe that the patient may possibly benefit from additional photocoagulation.
  12. History of panretinal scatter photocoagulation (PRP) within 4 months prior to randomization.
  13. Anticipated need for PRP in the 4 months following randomization.
  14. History of prior pars plana vitrectomy.
  15. History of major ocular surgery (including cataract extraction, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 6 months or anticipated within the next 6 months following randomization.
  16. History of YAG capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to randomization.
  17. Intraocular pressure ≥25 mmHg.
  18. History of open-angle glaucoma (either primary open-angle glaucoma or other cause of open-angle glaucoma.) Note: Angle-closure glaucoma is not an exclusion. A history of ocular hypertension is not an exclusion as long as (1) intraocular pressure (IOP) is <25 mm Hg, (2) the patient is using no more than one topical glaucoma medication, (3) the most recent visual field, performed within the last 12 months, is normal (if abnormalities are present on the visual field they must be attributable to the patient's diabetic retinopathy), and (4) the optic disc does not appear glaucomatous. If the intraocular pressure is 22 to <25 mm Hg, then the above criteria for ocular hypertension eligibility must be met.
  19. History of steroid-induced intraocular pressure elevation that required IOP-lowering treatment.
  20. History of prior herpetic ocular infection.
  21. Exam evidence of ocular toxoplasmosis.
  22. Aphakia.
  23. Exam evidence of pseudoexfoliation.
  24. Exam evidence of external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or significant blepharitis.

In patients with only one eye meeting criteria to be a study eye at the time of randomization, the fellow eye must meet the following criteria:

  1. Best corrected e-ETDRS visual acuity score ≥19 letters (i.e., 20/400 or better).
  2. No prior treatment with intravitreal corticosteroids.
  3. Intraocular pressure < 25 mmHg.
  4. No history of open-angle glaucoma (either primary open-angle glaucoma or other cause of open-angle glaucoma.)Note: Angle-closure glaucoma is not an exclusion. A history of ocular hypertension is not an exclusion as long as (1) intraocular pressure is <25 mmHg, (2) the patient is using no more than one topical glaucoma medication, (3) the most recent visual field, performed within the last 12 months, is normal (if abnormalities are present on the visual field they must be attributable to the patient's diabetic retinopathy), and (4) the optic disc does not appear glaucomatous. If the intraocular pressure is 22 to <25 mmHg, then the above criteria for ocular hypertension eligibility must be met.
  5. No history of steroid-induced intraocular pressure elevation that required IOP-lowering treatment.
  6. No exam evidence of pseudoexfoliation.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Doppelt

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Aktiver Komparator: 1
Standard of care group: conventional treatment consisting of focal/grid photocoagulation.
Standard of care group: conventional treatment consisting of focal/grid photocoagulation.
Andere Namen:
  • soc with laser
  • modified ETDRS photocoagulation
Experimental: 2
Intravitreal injection of 1mg of triamcinolone acetonide
Intravitreal injection of 1mg of triamcinolone acetonide at baseline. At each 4-month interval visit, the investigator will assess whether persistent or recurrent DME is present that warrants retreatment with the randomization assigned treatment. Retreatment, when indicated, will be performed within four weeks after the follow-up visit. Retreatment should not be performed sooner than 3.5 months from the time of the last treatment.
Andere Namen:
  • Kortikosteroid
Experimental: 3
Intravitreal injection of 4mg of triamcinolone acetonide
4mg intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection at baseline. At each 4-month interval visit, the investigator will assess whether persistent or recurrent DME is present that warrants retreatment with the randomization assigned treatment. Retreatment, when indicated, will be performed within four weeks after the follow-up visit. Retreatment should not be performed sooner than 3.5 months from the time of the last treatment.
Andere Namen:
  • Kortikosteroid

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change In Visual Acuity [Measured With Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS)]Baseline to 2 Years.
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 2 Years
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale 97, worst 0.
Baseline to 2 Years
Median Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Years
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 2 Years
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement.
Baseline to 2 Years
Distribution of Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Years
Zeitfenster: baseline to 2 years
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method.
baseline to 2 years

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Central Subfield Thickness at 2 Years
Zeitfenster: 2 Years
Median central subfield thickness at two-years. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
2 Years
Mean Change in Central Subfield Thickness Baseline to 2 Years
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 2 years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes and improvement.
Baseline to 2 years
Median Change in Central Subfield Thickness Baseline to 2 Years
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 2 Years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement.
Baseline to 2 Years
Overall Central Subfield Thickening Decreased by >=50% Baseline to 2 Years
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 2 Years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
Baseline to 2 Years
Central Subfield Thickness < 250 Microns at 2 Years
Zeitfenster: 2 Years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
2 Years
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 3 Years
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 3 year
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement.
Baseline to 3 year
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 3 Years
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 3 year
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best Value on the scale=97, Worst Value=0
Baseline to 3 year
Distribution of Visual Acuity Change Baseline to 3 Years
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 3 years
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale=97, worst=0
Baseline to 3 years
Central Subfield Thickness on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) at Three Years
Zeitfenster: 3 years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
3 years
Change in Central Subfield Thickness on OCT Baseline to 3 Years
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 3 years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement.
Baseline to 3 years
Percentage of Eyes With a Change in Central Subfield Thickness on OCT <250 Microns From Baseline to 3 Years
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 3 years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement.
Baseline to 3 years

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Studienstuhl: Michael Ip, M.D., University of Wisconsin Medical School

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn

1. Juli 2004

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Mai 2008

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Oktober 2008

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

3. August 2006

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

18. August 2006

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

22. August 2006

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Schätzen)

26. August 2016

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

25. August 2016

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. August 2016

Mehr Informationen

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Standard of Care Group

3
Abonnieren