このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Versus Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema (IVT)

2016年8月25日 更新者:Jaeb Center for Health Research

A Randomized Trial Comparing Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide and Laser Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema

The study involves the enrollment of patients over 18 years of age with diabetic macular edema(DME). Patients with one study eye will be randomly assigned (stratified by visual acuity and prior laser) with equal probability to one of the three treatment groups:

  1. Laser photocoagulation
  2. 1mg intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection
  3. 4mg intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection

For patients with two study eyes (both eyes eligible at the time of randomization), the right eye (stratified by visual acuity and prior laser) will be randomly assigned with equal probabilities to one of the three treatment groups listed above. The left eye will be assigned to the alternative treatment (laser or triamcinolone). If the left eye is assigned to triamcinolone, then the dose (1mg or 4 mg) will be randomly assigned to the left eye with equal probability (stratified by visual acuity and prior laser).

The study drug, triamcinolone acetonide, has been manufactured as a sterile intravitreal injectable by Allergan. Study eyes assigned to an intravitreal triamcinolone injection will receive a dose of either 1mg or 4mg. There is no indication of which treatment regimen will be better.

Patients enrolled into the study will be followed for three years and will have study visits every 4 months after receiving their assigned study treatment. In addition, standard of care post-treatment visits will be performed at 4 weeks after each intravitreal injection.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Diabetic retinopathy is a major cause of visual impairment in the United States. Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a manifestation of diabetic retinopathy that produces loss of central vision. Data from the Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy (WESDR) estimate that after 15 years of known diabetes, the prevalence of diabetic macular edema is approximately 20% in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM), 25% in patients with type 2 DM who are taking insulin, and 14% in patients with type 2 DM who do not take insulin.

In a review of three early studies concerning the natural history of diabetic macular edema, Ferris and Patz found that 53% of 135 eyes with diabetic macular edema, presumably all involving the center of the macula, lost two or more lines of visual acuity over a two year period. In the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), 33% of 221 untreated eyes available for follow-up at the 3-year visit, all with edema involving the center of the macula at baseline, had experienced a 15 or more letter decrease in visual acuity score (equivalent to a doubling of the visual angle, e.g., 20/25 to 20/50, and termed "moderate visual acuity loss").

In the ETDRS, focal/grid photocoagulation of eyes with clinically significant macular edema (CSME) reduced the risk of moderate visual loss by approximately 50% (from 24% to 12%, three years after initiation of treatment). Therefore, 12% of treated eyes developed moderate visual loss in spite of treatment. Furthermore, approximately 40% of treated eyes that had retinal thickening involving the center of the macula at baseline still had thickening involving the center at 12 months, as did 25% of treated eyes at 36 months.

Although several treatment modalities are currently under investigation, the only demonstrated means to reduce the risk of vision loss from diabetic macular edema are laser photocoagulation, as demonstrated by the ETDRS, and intensive glycemic control, as demonstrated by the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS). In the DCCT, intensive glucose control reduced the risk of onset of diabetic macular edema by 23% compared with conventional treatment. Long-term follow-up of patients in the DCCT show a sustained effect of intensive glucose control, with a 58% risk reduction in the development of diabetic macular edema for the DCCT patients followed in the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study.

The frequency of an unsatisfactory outcome following laser photocoagulation in some eyes with diabetic macular edema has prompted interest in other treatment modalities. One such treatment is pars plana vitrectomy. These studies suggest that vitreomacular traction, or the vitreous itself, may play a role in increased retinal vascular permeability. Removal of the vitreous or relief of mechanical traction with vitrectomy and membrane stripping may be followed by substantial resolution of macular edema and corresponding improvement in visual acuity. However, this treatment may be applicable only to a specific subset of eyes with diabetic macular edema. It also requires a complex surgical intervention with its inherent risks, recovery time, and expense. Other treatment modalities such as pharmacologic therapy with oral protein kinase C inhibitors and antibodies targeted at vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are under investigation. The use of intravitreal corticosteroids is another treatment modality that has generated recent interest.

The optimal dose of corticosteroid to maximize efficacy with minimum side effects is not known. A 4mg dose of Kenalog is principally being used in clinical practice. However, this dose has been used based on feasibility rather than scientific principles.

There is also experience using Kenalog doses of 1mg and 2mg. These doses anecdotally have been reported to reduce the macular edema. There is a rationale for using a dose lower than 4mg. Glucocorticoids bind to glucocorticoid receptors in the cell cytoplasm, and the steroid-receptor complex moves to the nucleus where it regulates gene expression. The steroid-receptor binding occurs with high affinity (low dissociation constant (Kd) which is on the order of 5 to 9 nanomolar). Complete saturation of all the receptors occurs about 20-fold higher levels, i.e., about 100-200 nanomolar. A 4mg dose of triamcinolone yields a final concentration of 7.5 millimolar, or nearly 10,000-fold more than the saturation dose. Thus, the effect of a 1mg dose may be equivalent to that of a 4mg dose, because compared to the 10,000-fold saturation, a 4-fold difference in dose is inconsequential. It is also possible that higher doses of corticosteroid could be less effective than lower doses due to down-regulation of the receptor. The steroid implant studies provide additional justification for evaluating a lower dose, a 0.5mg device which delivers only 0.5 micrograms per day has been observed to have a rapid effect in reducing macular edema.

There has been limited experience using doses greater than 4mg. Jonas' case series reported results using a 25mg dose. However, others have not been able to replicate this dose using the preparation procedure described by Jonas.

In the trial, 4mg and 1mg doses will be evaluated. The former will be used because it is the dose that is currently most commonly used in clinical practice and the latter because there is reasonable evidence for efficacy and the potential for lower risk. Although there is good reason to believe that a 1mg dose will reduce the macular edema, it is possible that the retreatment rate will be higher with this dose compared with 4mg since the latter will remain active in the eye for a longer duration than the former. Insufficient data are available to warrant evaluating a dose higher than 4mg at this time.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

840

段階

  • フェーズ 3

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock、Arkansas、アメリカ、72205-7199
        • Jones Eye Institute/University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
    • California
      • Baldwin Park、California、アメリカ、91706
        • SCPMG Regional Offices - Kaiser Permanente
      • Beverly Hills、California、アメリカ、90211
        • Retina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group
      • Irvine、California、アメリカ、92697
        • University of California, Irvine
      • Loma Linda、California、アメリカ、92354
        • Loma Linda University Health Care, Dept. of Ophthalmology
      • Los Angeles、California、アメリカ、90033
        • Doheny Eye Institute
      • Los Angeles、California、アメリカ、90095
        • Jules Stein Eye Institute
      • Palm Springs、California、アメリカ、92262
        • Southern California Desert Retina Consultants, MC
      • San Francisco、California、アメリカ、94107
        • West Coast Retina Medical Group, Inc.
      • Santa Ana、California、アメリカ、92705
        • Orange County Retina Medical Group
      • Santa Barbara、California、アメリカ、93103
        • California Retina Consultants
      • Walnut Creek、California、アメリカ、94598
        • Bay Area Retina Associates
    • Colorado
      • Denver、Colorado、アメリカ、80204
        • Denver Health Medical Center
      • Louisville、Colorado、アメリカ、80027
        • Eldorado Retina Associates, P.C.
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven、Connecticut、アメリカ、06519-1600
        • Connecticut Retina Consultants
      • New Haven、Connecticut、アメリカ、06519
        • Connecticut Retina Consultants
    • Florida
      • Fort Myers、Florida、アメリカ、33912
        • National Ophthalmic Research Institute
      • Ft. Lauderdale、Florida、アメリカ、33334
        • Retina Group of Florida
      • Lakeland、Florida、アメリカ、33805
        • Central Florida Retina Institute
      • Lakeland、Florida、アメリカ、33805
        • Florida Retina Consultants
      • Sarasota、Florida、アメリカ、34239
        • Sarasota Retina Institute
      • Tampa、Florida、アメリカ、33603
        • International Eye Center
    • Georgia
      • Augusta、Georgia、アメリカ、30909
        • Southeast Retina Center, P.C.
    • Hawaii
      • Aiea、Hawaii、アメリカ、96701
        • Retina Consultants of Hawaii, Inc.
      • Honolulu、Hawaii、アメリカ、96813
        • Retina Associates of Hawaii, Inc.
    • Illinois
      • Chicago、Illinois、アメリカ、60612
        • Rush University Medical Center
      • Chicago、Illinois、アメリカ、60611
        • Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation
      • Joliet、Illinois、アメリカ、60435
        • Illinois Retina Associates
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis、Indiana、アメリカ、46290
        • Raj K. Maturi, M.D., P.C.
      • New Albany、Indiana、アメリカ、47150
        • John-Kenyon American Eye Institute
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington、Kentucky、アメリカ、40509-1802
        • Retina and Vitreous Associates of Kentucky
      • Paducah、Kentucky、アメリカ、42001
        • Paducah Retinal Center
    • Maine
      • Bangor、Maine、アメリカ、04401
        • Maine Vitreoretinal Consultants
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore、Maryland、アメリカ、21237
        • Elman Retina Group, P.A.
      • Baltimore、Maryland、アメリカ、21287-9277
        • Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute at Johns Hopkins
      • Greenbelt、Maryland、アメリカ、20770-3502
        • The Retina Group of Washington
      • Salisbury、Maryland、アメリカ、21801
        • Retina Consultants of Delmarva, P.A.
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston、Massachusetts、アメリカ、02215
        • Joslin Diabetes Center
      • Boston、Massachusetts、アメリカ、02114
        • Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston
    • Michigan
      • Detroit、Michigan、アメリカ、48202
        • Henry Ford Health System, Dept of Ophthalmology and Eye Care Services
      • Detroit、Michigan、アメリカ、48201-1423
        • Kresge Eye Institute
      • Grand Rapids、Michigan、アメリカ、49546
        • Associated Retinal Consultants
      • Royal Oak、Michigan、アメリカ、48073
        • Vision Research Foundation
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis、Minnesota、アメリカ、55455
        • University of Minnesota
      • Minneapolis、Minnesota、アメリカ、55404
        • Retina Center, PA
    • Missouri
      • St. Louis、Missouri、アメリカ、63110
        • Barnes Retina Institute
      • St. Louis、Missouri、アメリカ、63104
        • St. Louis University Eye Institute
    • New Jersey
      • Lawrenceville、New Jersey、アメリカ、08648
        • Delaware Valley Retina Associates
    • New York
      • New York、New York、アメリカ、10003
        • The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary/Faculty Eye Practice
      • Rochester、New York、アメリカ、14642
        • University of Rochester
      • Slingerlands、New York、アメリカ、12159
        • Retina Consultants, PLLC
      • Syracuse、New York、アメリカ、13224
        • Retina-Vitreous Surgeons of Central New York, PC
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill、North Carolina、アメリカ、27599
        • University of North Carolina, Dept. of Ophthalmology
      • Charlotte、North Carolina、アメリカ、28210
        • Charlotte Eye Ear Nose and Throat Assoc, PA
      • Charlotte、North Carolina、アメリカ、28211
        • Horizon Eye Care, PA
      • Winston-Salem、North Carolina、アメリカ、27157
        • Wake Forest University Eye Center
    • Ohio
      • Beachwood、Ohio、アメリカ、44122
        • Retina Associates of Cleveland, Inc.
      • Cleveland、Ohio、アメリカ、44106
        • Case Western Reserve University
      • Dublin、Ohio、アメリカ、43017
        • OSU Eye Physicians and Surgeons, LLC.
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City、Oklahoma、アメリカ、73104
        • Dean A. McGee Eye Institute
    • Oregon
      • Portland、Oregon、アメリカ、97239
        • Casey Eye Institute
      • Portland、Oregon、アメリカ、97210
        • Retina Northwest, PC
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey、Pennsylvania、アメリカ、17033
        • Penn State College of Medicine
      • Philadelphia、Pennsylvania、アメリカ、19104
        • University of Pennsylvania Scheie Eye Institute
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence、Rhode Island、アメリカ、02903
        • Retina Consultants
    • South Carolina
      • Columbia、South Carolina、アメリカ、29223
        • Carolina Retina Center
      • Columbia、South Carolina、アメリカ、29169
        • Palmetto Retina Center
    • South Dakota
      • Rapid City、South Dakota、アメリカ、57701
        • Black Hills Regional Eye Institute
    • Tennessee
      • Knoxville、Tennessee、アメリカ、37909
        • Southeastern Retina Associates, P.C.
      • Nashville、Tennessee、アメリカ、37232
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Abilene、Texas、アメリカ、79605
        • West Texas Retina Consultants P.A.
      • Arlington、Texas、アメリカ、76012
        • Texas Retina Associates
      • Austin、Texas、アメリカ、78705
        • Retina Research Center
      • Dallas、Texas、アメリカ、75231
        • Texas Retina Associates
      • Galveston、Texas、アメリカ、77555-1106
        • University of Texas Medical Branch, Dept of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences
      • Houston、Texas、アメリカ、77030
        • Retina Consultants of Houston, PA
      • Houston、Texas、アメリカ、77025
        • Retina and Vitreous of Texas
      • Houston、Texas、アメリカ、77002
        • Charles A. Garcia, PA & Associates
      • Lubbock、Texas、アメリカ、79424
        • Texas Retina Associates
      • McAllen、Texas、アメリカ、78503
        • Valley Retina Institute
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City、Utah、アメリカ、84107
        • Rocky Mountain Retina Consultants
    • Washington
      • Seattle、Washington、アメリカ、98195
        • University of Washington Medical Center
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison、Wisconsin、アメリカ、53705
        • University of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept. of Ophthalmology
      • Milwaukee、Wisconsin、アメリカ、53226
        • Medical College of Wiconsin

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

18年歳以上 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

To be eligible, the following inclusion criteria must be met:

  1. Age ≥18 years
  2. Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2)
  3. Able and willing to provide informed consent.
  4. Patient understands that (1) if both eyes are eligible at the time of randomization, one eye will receive intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and one eye will receive laser, and (2) if only one eye is eligible at the time of randomization and the fellow eye develops DME later, then the fellow eye will not receive intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide if the study eye received intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (however, if the study eye was assigned to the laser group, then the fellow eye may be treated with the 4mg dose of the study intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide formulation, provided the eye assigned to laser has not received an intravitreal injection; such an eye will not be a "study eye" but since it is receiving study drug, it will be followed for adverse effects).

Exclusion Criteria

A patient is not eligible if any of the following exclusion criteria are present:

7. History of chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplant.

8. A condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure and glycemic control). Note: Patients in poor glycemic control who, within the last 4 months, initiated intensive insulin treatment (a pump or multiple daily injections) or plan to do so in the next 4 months should not be enrolled.

9. Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days of study entry that involved treatment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval at the time of study entry.

10. Known allergy to any corticosteroid or any component of the delivery vehicle.

11. History of systemic (e.g., oral, IV, IM, epidural, bursal) corticosteroids within 4 months prior to randomization or topical, rectal, or inhaled corticosteroids in current use more than 2 times per week.

12. Patient is expecting to move out of the area of the clinical center to an area not covered by another clinical center during the 3 years of the study.

13. Blood pressure > 180/110 (systolic above 180 OR diastolic above 110). Note: If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, patient can become eligible.

Study Eye Eligibility

Inclusion

  1. Best corrected Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (e-ETDRS) visual acuity score of ≥ 24 letters (i.e., 20/320 or better) and ≤73 letters (i.e., 20/40 or worse).
  2. Definite retinal thickening due to diabetic macular edema based on clinical exam involving the center of the macula.
  3. Mean retinal thickness on two Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) measurements ≥250 microns in the central subfield.
  4. Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and patient cooperation sufficient for adequate fundus photographs.

    Exclusion

  5. Macular edema is considered to be due to a cause other than diabetic macular edema.
  6. An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigmentary changes, dense subfoveal hard exudates, nonretinal condition).
  7. An ocular condition is present (other than diabetes) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, Irvine-Gass Syndrome, etc.)
  8. Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by 3 lines or more (i.e., cataract would be reducing acuity to 20/40 or worse if eye was otherwise normal).
  9. History of prior treatment with intravitreal corticosteroids.
  10. History of peribulbar steroid injection within 6 months prior to randomization.
  11. History of focal/grid macular photocoagulation within 15 weeks (3.5 months) prior to randomization.Note: Patients are not required to have had prior macular photocoagulation to be enrolled. If prior macular photocoagulation has been performed, the investigator should believe that the patient may possibly benefit from additional photocoagulation.
  12. History of panretinal scatter photocoagulation (PRP) within 4 months prior to randomization.
  13. Anticipated need for PRP in the 4 months following randomization.
  14. History of prior pars plana vitrectomy.
  15. History of major ocular surgery (including cataract extraction, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 6 months or anticipated within the next 6 months following randomization.
  16. History of YAG capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to randomization.
  17. Intraocular pressure ≥25 mmHg.
  18. History of open-angle glaucoma (either primary open-angle glaucoma or other cause of open-angle glaucoma.) Note: Angle-closure glaucoma is not an exclusion. A history of ocular hypertension is not an exclusion as long as (1) intraocular pressure (IOP) is <25 mm Hg, (2) the patient is using no more than one topical glaucoma medication, (3) the most recent visual field, performed within the last 12 months, is normal (if abnormalities are present on the visual field they must be attributable to the patient's diabetic retinopathy), and (4) the optic disc does not appear glaucomatous. If the intraocular pressure is 22 to <25 mm Hg, then the above criteria for ocular hypertension eligibility must be met.
  19. History of steroid-induced intraocular pressure elevation that required IOP-lowering treatment.
  20. History of prior herpetic ocular infection.
  21. Exam evidence of ocular toxoplasmosis.
  22. Aphakia.
  23. Exam evidence of pseudoexfoliation.
  24. Exam evidence of external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or significant blepharitis.

In patients with only one eye meeting criteria to be a study eye at the time of randomization, the fellow eye must meet the following criteria:

  1. Best corrected e-ETDRS visual acuity score ≥19 letters (i.e., 20/400 or better).
  2. No prior treatment with intravitreal corticosteroids.
  3. Intraocular pressure < 25 mmHg.
  4. No history of open-angle glaucoma (either primary open-angle glaucoma or other cause of open-angle glaucoma.)Note: Angle-closure glaucoma is not an exclusion. A history of ocular hypertension is not an exclusion as long as (1) intraocular pressure is <25 mmHg, (2) the patient is using no more than one topical glaucoma medication, (3) the most recent visual field, performed within the last 12 months, is normal (if abnormalities are present on the visual field they must be attributable to the patient's diabetic retinopathy), and (4) the optic disc does not appear glaucomatous. If the intraocular pressure is 22 to <25 mmHg, then the above criteria for ocular hypertension eligibility must be met.
  5. No history of steroid-induced intraocular pressure elevation that required IOP-lowering treatment.
  6. No exam evidence of pseudoexfoliation.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:ダブル

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
アクティブコンパレータ:1
Standard of care group: conventional treatment consisting of focal/grid photocoagulation.
Standard of care group: conventional treatment consisting of focal/grid photocoagulation.
他の名前:
  • soc with laser
  • modified ETDRS photocoagulation
実験的:2
Intravitreal injection of 1mg of triamcinolone acetonide
Intravitreal injection of 1mg of triamcinolone acetonide at baseline. At each 4-month interval visit, the investigator will assess whether persistent or recurrent DME is present that warrants retreatment with the randomization assigned treatment. Retreatment, when indicated, will be performed within four weeks after the follow-up visit. Retreatment should not be performed sooner than 3.5 months from the time of the last treatment.
他の名前:
  • コルチコステロイド
実験的:3
Intravitreal injection of 4mg of triamcinolone acetonide
4mg intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection at baseline. At each 4-month interval visit, the investigator will assess whether persistent or recurrent DME is present that warrants retreatment with the randomization assigned treatment. Retreatment, when indicated, will be performed within four weeks after the follow-up visit. Retreatment should not be performed sooner than 3.5 months from the time of the last treatment.
他の名前:
  • コルチコステロイド

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change In Visual Acuity [Measured With Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS)]Baseline to 2 Years.
時間枠:Baseline to 2 Years
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale 97, worst 0.
Baseline to 2 Years
Median Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Years
時間枠:Baseline to 2 Years
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement.
Baseline to 2 Years
Distribution of Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Years
時間枠:baseline to 2 years
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method.
baseline to 2 years

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Central Subfield Thickness at 2 Years
時間枠:2 Years
Median central subfield thickness at two-years. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
2 Years
Mean Change in Central Subfield Thickness Baseline to 2 Years
時間枠:Baseline to 2 years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes and improvement.
Baseline to 2 years
Median Change in Central Subfield Thickness Baseline to 2 Years
時間枠:Baseline to 2 Years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement.
Baseline to 2 Years
Overall Central Subfield Thickening Decreased by >=50% Baseline to 2 Years
時間枠:Baseline to 2 Years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
Baseline to 2 Years
Central Subfield Thickness < 250 Microns at 2 Years
時間枠:2 Years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
2 Years
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 3 Years
時間枠:Baseline to 3 year
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement.
Baseline to 3 year
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 3 Years
時間枠:Baseline to 3 year
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best Value on the scale=97, Worst Value=0
Baseline to 3 year
Distribution of Visual Acuity Change Baseline to 3 Years
時間枠:Baseline to 3 years
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale=97, worst=0
Baseline to 3 years
Central Subfield Thickness on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) at Three Years
時間枠:3 years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
3 years
Change in Central Subfield Thickness on OCT Baseline to 3 Years
時間枠:Baseline to 3 years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement.
Baseline to 3 years
Percentage of Eyes With a Change in Central Subfield Thickness on OCT <250 Microns From Baseline to 3 Years
時間枠:Baseline to 3 years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement.
Baseline to 3 years

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

捜査官

  • スタディチェア:Michael Ip, M.D.、University of Wisconsin Medical School

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

一般刊行物

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始

2004年7月1日

一次修了 (実際)

2008年5月1日

研究の完了 (実際)

2008年10月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2006年8月3日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2006年8月18日

最初の投稿 (見積もり)

2006年8月22日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (見積もり)

2016年8月26日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2016年8月25日

最終確認日

2016年8月1日

詳しくは

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

Standard of Care Groupの臨床試験

3
購読する