이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Versus Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema (IVT)

2016년 8월 25일 업데이트: Jaeb Center for Health Research

A Randomized Trial Comparing Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide and Laser Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema

The study involves the enrollment of patients over 18 years of age with diabetic macular edema(DME). Patients with one study eye will be randomly assigned (stratified by visual acuity and prior laser) with equal probability to one of the three treatment groups:

  1. Laser photocoagulation
  2. 1mg intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection
  3. 4mg intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection

For patients with two study eyes (both eyes eligible at the time of randomization), the right eye (stratified by visual acuity and prior laser) will be randomly assigned with equal probabilities to one of the three treatment groups listed above. The left eye will be assigned to the alternative treatment (laser or triamcinolone). If the left eye is assigned to triamcinolone, then the dose (1mg or 4 mg) will be randomly assigned to the left eye with equal probability (stratified by visual acuity and prior laser).

The study drug, triamcinolone acetonide, has been manufactured as a sterile intravitreal injectable by Allergan. Study eyes assigned to an intravitreal triamcinolone injection will receive a dose of either 1mg or 4mg. There is no indication of which treatment regimen will be better.

Patients enrolled into the study will be followed for three years and will have study visits every 4 months after receiving their assigned study treatment. In addition, standard of care post-treatment visits will be performed at 4 weeks after each intravitreal injection.

연구 개요

상세 설명

Diabetic retinopathy is a major cause of visual impairment in the United States. Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a manifestation of diabetic retinopathy that produces loss of central vision. Data from the Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy (WESDR) estimate that after 15 years of known diabetes, the prevalence of diabetic macular edema is approximately 20% in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM), 25% in patients with type 2 DM who are taking insulin, and 14% in patients with type 2 DM who do not take insulin.

In a review of three early studies concerning the natural history of diabetic macular edema, Ferris and Patz found that 53% of 135 eyes with diabetic macular edema, presumably all involving the center of the macula, lost two or more lines of visual acuity over a two year period. In the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), 33% of 221 untreated eyes available for follow-up at the 3-year visit, all with edema involving the center of the macula at baseline, had experienced a 15 or more letter decrease in visual acuity score (equivalent to a doubling of the visual angle, e.g., 20/25 to 20/50, and termed "moderate visual acuity loss").

In the ETDRS, focal/grid photocoagulation of eyes with clinically significant macular edema (CSME) reduced the risk of moderate visual loss by approximately 50% (from 24% to 12%, three years after initiation of treatment). Therefore, 12% of treated eyes developed moderate visual loss in spite of treatment. Furthermore, approximately 40% of treated eyes that had retinal thickening involving the center of the macula at baseline still had thickening involving the center at 12 months, as did 25% of treated eyes at 36 months.

Although several treatment modalities are currently under investigation, the only demonstrated means to reduce the risk of vision loss from diabetic macular edema are laser photocoagulation, as demonstrated by the ETDRS, and intensive glycemic control, as demonstrated by the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS). In the DCCT, intensive glucose control reduced the risk of onset of diabetic macular edema by 23% compared with conventional treatment. Long-term follow-up of patients in the DCCT show a sustained effect of intensive glucose control, with a 58% risk reduction in the development of diabetic macular edema for the DCCT patients followed in the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study.

The frequency of an unsatisfactory outcome following laser photocoagulation in some eyes with diabetic macular edema has prompted interest in other treatment modalities. One such treatment is pars plana vitrectomy. These studies suggest that vitreomacular traction, or the vitreous itself, may play a role in increased retinal vascular permeability. Removal of the vitreous or relief of mechanical traction with vitrectomy and membrane stripping may be followed by substantial resolution of macular edema and corresponding improvement in visual acuity. However, this treatment may be applicable only to a specific subset of eyes with diabetic macular edema. It also requires a complex surgical intervention with its inherent risks, recovery time, and expense. Other treatment modalities such as pharmacologic therapy with oral protein kinase C inhibitors and antibodies targeted at vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are under investigation. The use of intravitreal corticosteroids is another treatment modality that has generated recent interest.

The optimal dose of corticosteroid to maximize efficacy with minimum side effects is not known. A 4mg dose of Kenalog is principally being used in clinical practice. However, this dose has been used based on feasibility rather than scientific principles.

There is also experience using Kenalog doses of 1mg and 2mg. These doses anecdotally have been reported to reduce the macular edema. There is a rationale for using a dose lower than 4mg. Glucocorticoids bind to glucocorticoid receptors in the cell cytoplasm, and the steroid-receptor complex moves to the nucleus where it regulates gene expression. The steroid-receptor binding occurs with high affinity (low dissociation constant (Kd) which is on the order of 5 to 9 nanomolar). Complete saturation of all the receptors occurs about 20-fold higher levels, i.e., about 100-200 nanomolar. A 4mg dose of triamcinolone yields a final concentration of 7.5 millimolar, or nearly 10,000-fold more than the saturation dose. Thus, the effect of a 1mg dose may be equivalent to that of a 4mg dose, because compared to the 10,000-fold saturation, a 4-fold difference in dose is inconsequential. It is also possible that higher doses of corticosteroid could be less effective than lower doses due to down-regulation of the receptor. The steroid implant studies provide additional justification for evaluating a lower dose, a 0.5mg device which delivers only 0.5 micrograms per day has been observed to have a rapid effect in reducing macular edema.

There has been limited experience using doses greater than 4mg. Jonas' case series reported results using a 25mg dose. However, others have not been able to replicate this dose using the preparation procedure described by Jonas.

In the trial, 4mg and 1mg doses will be evaluated. The former will be used because it is the dose that is currently most commonly used in clinical practice and the latter because there is reasonable evidence for efficacy and the potential for lower risk. Although there is good reason to believe that a 1mg dose will reduce the macular edema, it is possible that the retreatment rate will be higher with this dose compared with 4mg since the latter will remain active in the eye for a longer duration than the former. Insufficient data are available to warrant evaluating a dose higher than 4mg at this time.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

840

단계

  • 3단계

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, 미국, 72205-7199
        • Jones Eye Institute/University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
    • California
      • Baldwin Park, California, 미국, 91706
        • SCPMG Regional Offices - Kaiser Permanente
      • Beverly Hills, California, 미국, 90211
        • Retina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group
      • Irvine, California, 미국, 92697
        • University of California, Irvine
      • Loma Linda, California, 미국, 92354
        • Loma Linda University Health Care, Dept. of Ophthalmology
      • Los Angeles, California, 미국, 90033
        • Doheny Eye Institute
      • Los Angeles, California, 미국, 90095
        • Jules Stein Eye Institute
      • Palm Springs, California, 미국, 92262
        • Southern California Desert Retina Consultants, MC
      • San Francisco, California, 미국, 94107
        • West Coast Retina Medical Group, Inc.
      • Santa Ana, California, 미국, 92705
        • Orange County Retina Medical Group
      • Santa Barbara, California, 미국, 93103
        • California Retina Consultants
      • Walnut Creek, California, 미국, 94598
        • Bay Area Retina Associates
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, 미국, 80204
        • Denver Health Medical Center
      • Louisville, Colorado, 미국, 80027
        • Eldorado Retina Associates, P.C.
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, 미국, 06519-1600
        • Connecticut Retina Consultants
      • New Haven, Connecticut, 미국, 06519
        • Connecticut Retina Consultants
    • Florida
      • Fort Myers, Florida, 미국, 33912
        • National Ophthalmic Research Institute
      • Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, 미국, 33334
        • Retina Group of Florida
      • Lakeland, Florida, 미국, 33805
        • Central Florida Retina Institute
      • Lakeland, Florida, 미국, 33805
        • Florida Retina Consultants
      • Sarasota, Florida, 미국, 34239
        • Sarasota Retina Institute
      • Tampa, Florida, 미국, 33603
        • International Eye Center
    • Georgia
      • Augusta, Georgia, 미국, 30909
        • Southeast Retina Center, P.C.
    • Hawaii
      • Aiea, Hawaii, 미국, 96701
        • Retina Consultants of Hawaii, Inc.
      • Honolulu, Hawaii, 미국, 96813
        • Retina Associates of Hawaii, Inc.
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, 미국, 60612
        • Rush University Medical Center
      • Chicago, Illinois, 미국, 60611
        • Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation
      • Joliet, Illinois, 미국, 60435
        • Illinois Retina Associates
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, 미국, 46290
        • Raj K. Maturi, M.D., P.C.
      • New Albany, Indiana, 미국, 47150
        • John-Kenyon American Eye Institute
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, 미국, 40509-1802
        • Retina and Vitreous Associates of Kentucky
      • Paducah, Kentucky, 미국, 42001
        • Paducah Retinal Center
    • Maine
      • Bangor, Maine, 미국, 04401
        • Maine Vitreoretinal Consultants
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, 미국, 21237
        • Elman Retina Group, P.A.
      • Baltimore, Maryland, 미국, 21287-9277
        • Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute at Johns Hopkins
      • Greenbelt, Maryland, 미국, 20770-3502
        • The Retina Group of Washington
      • Salisbury, Maryland, 미국, 21801
        • Retina Consultants of Delmarva, P.A.
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, 미국, 02215
        • Joslin Diabetes Center
      • Boston, Massachusetts, 미국, 02114
        • Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, 미국, 48202
        • Henry Ford Health System, Dept of Ophthalmology and Eye Care Services
      • Detroit, Michigan, 미국, 48201-1423
        • Kresge Eye Institute
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, 미국, 49546
        • Associated Retinal Consultants
      • Royal Oak, Michigan, 미국, 48073
        • Vision Research Foundation
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, 미국, 55455
        • University of Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, 미국, 55404
        • Retina Center, PA
    • Missouri
      • St. Louis, Missouri, 미국, 63110
        • Barnes Retina Institute
      • St. Louis, Missouri, 미국, 63104
        • St. Louis University Eye Institute
    • New Jersey
      • Lawrenceville, New Jersey, 미국, 08648
        • Delaware Valley Retina Associates
    • New York
      • New York, New York, 미국, 10003
        • The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary/Faculty Eye Practice
      • Rochester, New York, 미국, 14642
        • University of Rochester
      • Slingerlands, New York, 미국, 12159
        • Retina Consultants, PLLC
      • Syracuse, New York, 미국, 13224
        • Retina-Vitreous Surgeons of Central New York, PC
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 미국, 27599
        • University of North Carolina, Dept. of Ophthalmology
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, 미국, 28210
        • Charlotte Eye Ear Nose and Throat Assoc, PA
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, 미국, 28211
        • Horizon Eye Care, PA
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 미국, 27157
        • Wake Forest University Eye Center
    • Ohio
      • Beachwood, Ohio, 미국, 44122
        • Retina Associates of Cleveland, Inc.
      • Cleveland, Ohio, 미국, 44106
        • Case Western Reserve University
      • Dublin, Ohio, 미국, 43017
        • OSU Eye Physicians and Surgeons, LLC.
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 미국, 73104
        • Dean A. McGee Eye Institute
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, 미국, 97239
        • Casey Eye Institute
      • Portland, Oregon, 미국, 97210
        • Retina Northwest, PC
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, 미국, 17033
        • Penn State College of Medicine
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 미국, 19104
        • University of Pennsylvania Scheie Eye Institute
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, 미국, 02903
        • Retina Consultants
    • South Carolina
      • Columbia, South Carolina, 미국, 29223
        • Carolina Retina Center
      • Columbia, South Carolina, 미국, 29169
        • Palmetto Retina Center
    • South Dakota
      • Rapid City, South Dakota, 미국, 57701
        • Black Hills Regional Eye Institute
    • Tennessee
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, 미국, 37909
        • Southeastern Retina Associates, P.C.
      • Nashville, Tennessee, 미국, 37232
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Abilene, Texas, 미국, 79605
        • West Texas Retina Consultants P.A.
      • Arlington, Texas, 미국, 76012
        • Texas Retina Associates
      • Austin, Texas, 미국, 78705
        • Retina Research Center
      • Dallas, Texas, 미국, 75231
        • Texas Retina Associates
      • Galveston, Texas, 미국, 77555-1106
        • University of Texas Medical Branch, Dept of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences
      • Houston, Texas, 미국, 77030
        • Retina Consultants of Houston, PA
      • Houston, Texas, 미국, 77025
        • Retina and Vitreous of Texas
      • Houston, Texas, 미국, 77002
        • Charles A. Garcia, PA & Associates
      • Lubbock, Texas, 미국, 79424
        • Texas Retina Associates
      • McAllen, Texas, 미국, 78503
        • Valley Retina Institute
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, 미국, 84107
        • Rocky Mountain Retina Consultants
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, 미국, 98195
        • University of Washington Medical Center
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, 미국, 53705
        • University of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept. of Ophthalmology
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 미국, 53226
        • Medical College of Wiconsin

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 이상 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

To be eligible, the following inclusion criteria must be met:

  1. Age ≥18 years
  2. Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2)
  3. Able and willing to provide informed consent.
  4. Patient understands that (1) if both eyes are eligible at the time of randomization, one eye will receive intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and one eye will receive laser, and (2) if only one eye is eligible at the time of randomization and the fellow eye develops DME later, then the fellow eye will not receive intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide if the study eye received intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (however, if the study eye was assigned to the laser group, then the fellow eye may be treated with the 4mg dose of the study intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide formulation, provided the eye assigned to laser has not received an intravitreal injection; such an eye will not be a "study eye" but since it is receiving study drug, it will be followed for adverse effects).

Exclusion Criteria

A patient is not eligible if any of the following exclusion criteria are present:

7. History of chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplant.

8. A condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure and glycemic control). Note: Patients in poor glycemic control who, within the last 4 months, initiated intensive insulin treatment (a pump or multiple daily injections) or plan to do so in the next 4 months should not be enrolled.

9. Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days of study entry that involved treatment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval at the time of study entry.

10. Known allergy to any corticosteroid or any component of the delivery vehicle.

11. History of systemic (e.g., oral, IV, IM, epidural, bursal) corticosteroids within 4 months prior to randomization or topical, rectal, or inhaled corticosteroids in current use more than 2 times per week.

12. Patient is expecting to move out of the area of the clinical center to an area not covered by another clinical center during the 3 years of the study.

13. Blood pressure > 180/110 (systolic above 180 OR diastolic above 110). Note: If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, patient can become eligible.

Study Eye Eligibility

Inclusion

  1. Best corrected Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (e-ETDRS) visual acuity score of ≥ 24 letters (i.e., 20/320 or better) and ≤73 letters (i.e., 20/40 or worse).
  2. Definite retinal thickening due to diabetic macular edema based on clinical exam involving the center of the macula.
  3. Mean retinal thickness on two Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) measurements ≥250 microns in the central subfield.
  4. Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and patient cooperation sufficient for adequate fundus photographs.

    Exclusion

  5. Macular edema is considered to be due to a cause other than diabetic macular edema.
  6. An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigmentary changes, dense subfoveal hard exudates, nonretinal condition).
  7. An ocular condition is present (other than diabetes) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, Irvine-Gass Syndrome, etc.)
  8. Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by 3 lines or more (i.e., cataract would be reducing acuity to 20/40 or worse if eye was otherwise normal).
  9. History of prior treatment with intravitreal corticosteroids.
  10. History of peribulbar steroid injection within 6 months prior to randomization.
  11. History of focal/grid macular photocoagulation within 15 weeks (3.5 months) prior to randomization.Note: Patients are not required to have had prior macular photocoagulation to be enrolled. If prior macular photocoagulation has been performed, the investigator should believe that the patient may possibly benefit from additional photocoagulation.
  12. History of panretinal scatter photocoagulation (PRP) within 4 months prior to randomization.
  13. Anticipated need for PRP in the 4 months following randomization.
  14. History of prior pars plana vitrectomy.
  15. History of major ocular surgery (including cataract extraction, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 6 months or anticipated within the next 6 months following randomization.
  16. History of YAG capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to randomization.
  17. Intraocular pressure ≥25 mmHg.
  18. History of open-angle glaucoma (either primary open-angle glaucoma or other cause of open-angle glaucoma.) Note: Angle-closure glaucoma is not an exclusion. A history of ocular hypertension is not an exclusion as long as (1) intraocular pressure (IOP) is <25 mm Hg, (2) the patient is using no more than one topical glaucoma medication, (3) the most recent visual field, performed within the last 12 months, is normal (if abnormalities are present on the visual field they must be attributable to the patient's diabetic retinopathy), and (4) the optic disc does not appear glaucomatous. If the intraocular pressure is 22 to <25 mm Hg, then the above criteria for ocular hypertension eligibility must be met.
  19. History of steroid-induced intraocular pressure elevation that required IOP-lowering treatment.
  20. History of prior herpetic ocular infection.
  21. Exam evidence of ocular toxoplasmosis.
  22. Aphakia.
  23. Exam evidence of pseudoexfoliation.
  24. Exam evidence of external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or significant blepharitis.

In patients with only one eye meeting criteria to be a study eye at the time of randomization, the fellow eye must meet the following criteria:

  1. Best corrected e-ETDRS visual acuity score ≥19 letters (i.e., 20/400 or better).
  2. No prior treatment with intravitreal corticosteroids.
  3. Intraocular pressure < 25 mmHg.
  4. No history of open-angle glaucoma (either primary open-angle glaucoma or other cause of open-angle glaucoma.)Note: Angle-closure glaucoma is not an exclusion. A history of ocular hypertension is not an exclusion as long as (1) intraocular pressure is <25 mmHg, (2) the patient is using no more than one topical glaucoma medication, (3) the most recent visual field, performed within the last 12 months, is normal (if abnormalities are present on the visual field they must be attributable to the patient's diabetic retinopathy), and (4) the optic disc does not appear glaucomatous. If the intraocular pressure is 22 to <25 mmHg, then the above criteria for ocular hypertension eligibility must be met.
  5. No history of steroid-induced intraocular pressure elevation that required IOP-lowering treatment.
  6. No exam evidence of pseudoexfoliation.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 더블

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
활성 비교기: 1
Standard of care group: conventional treatment consisting of focal/grid photocoagulation.
Standard of care group: conventional treatment consisting of focal/grid photocoagulation.
다른 이름들:
  • soc with laser
  • modified ETDRS photocoagulation
실험적: 2
Intravitreal injection of 1mg of triamcinolone acetonide
Intravitreal injection of 1mg of triamcinolone acetonide at baseline. At each 4-month interval visit, the investigator will assess whether persistent or recurrent DME is present that warrants retreatment with the randomization assigned treatment. Retreatment, when indicated, will be performed within four weeks after the follow-up visit. Retreatment should not be performed sooner than 3.5 months from the time of the last treatment.
다른 이름들:
  • 코르티코 스테로이드
실험적: 3
Intravitreal injection of 4mg of triamcinolone acetonide
4mg intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection at baseline. At each 4-month interval visit, the investigator will assess whether persistent or recurrent DME is present that warrants retreatment with the randomization assigned treatment. Retreatment, when indicated, will be performed within four weeks after the follow-up visit. Retreatment should not be performed sooner than 3.5 months from the time of the last treatment.
다른 이름들:
  • 코르티코 스테로이드

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Change In Visual Acuity [Measured With Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS)]Baseline to 2 Years.
기간: Baseline to 2 Years
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale 97, worst 0.
Baseline to 2 Years
Median Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Years
기간: Baseline to 2 Years
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement.
Baseline to 2 Years
Distribution of Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Years
기간: baseline to 2 years
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method.
baseline to 2 years

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Central Subfield Thickness at 2 Years
기간: 2 Years
Median central subfield thickness at two-years. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
2 Years
Mean Change in Central Subfield Thickness Baseline to 2 Years
기간: Baseline to 2 years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes and improvement.
Baseline to 2 years
Median Change in Central Subfield Thickness Baseline to 2 Years
기간: Baseline to 2 Years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement.
Baseline to 2 Years
Overall Central Subfield Thickening Decreased by >=50% Baseline to 2 Years
기간: Baseline to 2 Years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
Baseline to 2 Years
Central Subfield Thickness < 250 Microns at 2 Years
기간: 2 Years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
2 Years
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 3 Years
기간: Baseline to 3 year
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement.
Baseline to 3 year
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 3 Years
기간: Baseline to 3 year
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best Value on the scale=97, Worst Value=0
Baseline to 3 year
Distribution of Visual Acuity Change Baseline to 3 Years
기간: Baseline to 3 years
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale=97, worst=0
Baseline to 3 years
Central Subfield Thickness on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) at Three Years
기간: 3 years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
3 years
Change in Central Subfield Thickness on OCT Baseline to 3 Years
기간: Baseline to 3 years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement.
Baseline to 3 years
Percentage of Eyes With a Change in Central Subfield Thickness on OCT <250 Microns From Baseline to 3 Years
기간: Baseline to 3 years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement.
Baseline to 3 years

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 연구 의자: Michael Ip, M.D., University of Wisconsin Medical School

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

일반 간행물

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작

2004년 7월 1일

기본 완료 (실제)

2008년 5월 1일

연구 완료 (실제)

2008년 10월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2006년 8월 3일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2006년 8월 18일

처음 게시됨 (추정)

2006년 8월 22일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (추정)

2016년 8월 26일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2016년 8월 25일

마지막으로 확인됨

2016년 8월 1일

추가 정보

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

Standard of Care Group에 대한 임상 시험

3
구독하다