Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Default Options in Advance Directives

29. März 2019 aktualisiert von: Scott Halpern, University of Pennsylvania
In a multicenter, randomized clinical trial of default options in advance directives among patients with incurable diseases, we will determine whether this simple and readily scalable intervention can improve patients quality of life and reduce resource utilization without reducing the number of days that patients are alive and living outside of an acute-care hospital.

Studienübersicht

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Voraussichtlich)

270

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Vereinigte Staaten, 19104
        • Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Vereinigte Staaten, 19107
        • Pennsylvania Hospital
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Vereinigte Staaten, 19104
        • The Perelman Center for Advance Medicine
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Vereinigte Staaten, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 or older
  • Fluent in English
  • Has seen current physician at least once prior to current visit
  • Resident of Pennsylvania or New Jersey
  • One or more of the following diagnoses:
  • Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
  • Stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, or cholangiocarcinoma
  • Stage IV breast, colon, esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, prostate, uterine, cervical, ovarian, or urothelial cancer; paraganglioma, or pheochromocytoma
  • Stage C or D hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Stage IV renal cell carcinoma
  • Stage IV or V chronic kidney disease
  • Mesothelioma or any malignancy metastatic to the pleura
  • Other incurable interstitial lung diseases with at least severe restriction on most recent pulmonary function tests or eligible for long-term oxygen therapy
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with at least severe airflow obstruction on most recent spirometry or eligible for long-term oxygen therapy
  • Congestive heart failure with NYHA Class IV status or Class III plus 1 heart failure related hospitalization in the past 12 months or ACC stage D or C classification with 1 heart failure related hospitalization in the past 12 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently listed for or being considered for solid organ transplant
  • Patients with a previously signed advance directive or living will.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Versorgungsforschung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Verdreifachen

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Life-extension default
Subjects in this group will receive an advance directive form that defaults to an overall goal of care directed towards life extension (vs. comfort oriented care) unless the subject specifies otherwise. The form also states 4 specific life extending interventions (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, hemodialysis, and feeding tube insertion) will be provided unless patients specifically opt-out from such selections. It also will state that upon discharge from the hospital, long-term care (vs. hospice care) will be provided unless the patient chooses otherwise.
Experimental: Comfort default
Subjects in this group will receive an advance directive form that defaults to an overall goal of care directed towards comfort and relief of pain and suffering (vs. life extension) unless the subject specifies otherwise. The form also states 4 specific life extending interventions (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, hemodialysis, and feeding tube insertion) will be not provided unless patients specifically opts into such selections. It also will state that upon discharge from the hospital, hospice care (vs. long-term care) will be provided unless the patient chooses otherwise.
Kein Eingriff: Standard advance directive
Subjects in the standard advance directive (AD) group will receive an AD that will have no options pre-selected.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Hospital free days
Zeitfenster: 6 months
The primary outcome is "Hospital-Free Days" (HFDs), a measure that PI Halpern has been developing in collaboration with Dr. Jeffrey Silber at Penn's Center for Outcomes Research. As the name describes, HFDs represent the number of days alive and not in an acute care facility. Although this is a simple concept, and provides an outcome measure of obvious importance to patients, the use of HFDs as a primary outcome in an RCT is highly innovative. To bolster confidence in the results, we will evaluate two key variations on the theme. First, we will explore "Healthcare Facility-Free Days," which represents the number of days alive where a patient is in neither an acute care facility, a chronic care facility, or a nursing home. We will also evaluate HFDs within a defined period of follow-up - 6 months in this case. This is analogous to the established outcome of ventilator-free days used commonly in RCTs among ICU patients
6 months

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Hospital and ICU admissions
Zeitfenster: up to 1 year
The numbers of admissions will be analyzed as count data. From the dates of hospital and ICU admissions, we will calculate the proportion of each patient's total survival time during study follow-up that was spent in the hospital or ICU.
up to 1 year
Costs of care
Zeitfenster: up to 1 year
We will combine all costs of inpatient and outpatient hospice, hospital stays, and life-sustaining procedures. The perspective will be that of all potential payers. Costs will be inflated to the date on which analyses are performed using the U.S. gross domestic product deflator
up to 1 year
Hospice utilization
Zeitfenster: up to 1 year
We will analyze hospice utilization in 2 ways: (a) time from advance directive completion to hospice enrollment; and (b) duration of hospice utilization prior to death.
up to 1 year
Choices to receive 4 potentially life-sustaining interventions, and the concordance of these choices with whether the interventions were actually received
Zeitfenster: up to 1 year
We will record selections that patients made on their advance directives about 4 specific life-sustaining interventions. Utilizing data from the Pennsylvania Healthcare Cost Containment Consortium and the New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services, we will be able to determine which patients received each intervention. Thus, we will be able to reliably evaluate the proportions of patients who received unwanted interventions. Because we cannot determine the denominator of patients with indications for these interventions, we will not evaluate the proportions of patients who went without desired services.
up to 1 year
Choices regarding post-hospitalization care, and the concordance of these choices with the care actually received
Zeitfenster: up to 1 year
Patients will indicate on their advance directives forms their selections for post-hospitalization care. We will utilize data from the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Consortium and New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services to asses if the care patient indicate is the care they receive.
up to 1 year
Decision conflict
Zeitfenster: up to 1 year
The decision conflict scale is a well-validated instrument used to assess patients' certainty in making healthcare decisions. The DCS will be sent home with consenting patients to complete and return along with their advance directive forms and an instruction sheet explaining to patients that they should complete their advance directive forms first, followed by the DCS, and both should be mailed to the research team in the provided stamped envelope.
up to 1 year
Decision satisfaction
Zeitfenster: up to 1 year
Satisfaction will also be measured with the CANHELP instrument's global satisfaction with end-of-life care question.
up to 1 year
Quality of Life using the McGill Quality of Life (MQOL) instrument.
Zeitfenster: up to 1 year
The MQOL is a well-Validated and widely used scale designed specifically for patients with serious illnesses. The MQOL can be completed by family members on behalf of patients who have lost the capacity to complete it themselves. Thus, we will have surrogates (the individuals identified on patients' advance directive forms as their appointed healthcare agents) complete the MQOL for incapacitated patients to minimize missing data.
up to 1 year
Surrogates' Perception of the quality of death and dying
Zeitfenster: within 3 months of patient death
Because we are recruiting patients with serious life-limiting illnesses, we anticipate that some patients will die over the course of this study period. We will speak with surrogates of deceased patients to assess their perceived quality of death and dying using Prigerson's Quality of Death measure.
within 3 months of patient death
Post-traumatic stress in surrogates
Zeitfenster: within 3 months of patient death
The risk of post-traumatic stress disorder in surrogates among deceased patients will be assessed using the Impact of Events Scale. The IES is a valid and reliable scale that has been used frequently to assess PTSD risk among family members of critically ill patients.
within 3 months of patient death

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Scott D. Halpern, MD, PhD, University of Pennsylvania

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

1. Januar 2014

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. November 2016

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. November 2016

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

16. Dezember 2013

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

16. Dezember 2013

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

20. Dezember 2013

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

1. April 2019

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

29. März 2019

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. März 2019

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • UPenn 819325

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren