Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Early Versus Late Resumption of Anticoagulation in Patients With Both High Thrombosis Risk and Major HEmoRrhage (RATHER)

Randomized Assay Evaluating the Risk/Benefit of Early Versus Late Resumption of Anticoagulation in Patients With Major, Non-trauma Related Hemorrhage Occurring While on Anticoagulant Treatment for a High Risk of Thrombosis.

In patients with a high thromboembolic risk, withdrawing anticoagulant treatment is recommended in some situations, including when major hæmorrhage occurs. But withdrawing treatment can be risky. In patients on a curative dose of anticoagulant medicine, treatment withdrawal heightens the risk of thromboembolic events occurring, with potentially major consequences. For instance, mechanical valve thrombosis is fatal in 15% of patients. Resumption of anticoagulation is therefore critical in patients at high risk for thromboembolic events.

However, in these patients having presented major hæmorrhage, resumption of anticoagulation heightens the risk of hæmorrhage recurrence. This risk is even higher when the original hæmorrhage was not accessible via surgical, endoscopic or endoluminal hemostasis.

As far as investigators know, there is no data in the literature to rely on when the major hæmorrhage is not accessible via hemostatic intervention and the risk of thrombosis is high. When confronted with patients who need anticoagulation but have a high risk of hæmorrhage recurrence, the question of when treatment should be resumed has not been resolved. This is why investigators propose to conduct a randomised comparative study to evaluate two treatment strategies - early resumption (H48 to H72) versus late resumption (H120 to H144) of anticoagulation.

MAIN OBJECTIVE: The main objective of the present study is to evaluate in terms of bleeding risk, thrombosis risk and mortality at one month, the effect of early vs. late resumption of anticoagulation in patients having presented with serious hæmorrhage while on curative-dose anticoagulants and facing a high thromboembolic risk.

Studienübersicht

Status

Beendet

Bedingungen

Detaillierte Beschreibung

STUDY DESIGN: This is a comparative, randomised, open study assessing after 1 month and 3 months the effect of early (H48 to 72) versus late (H120 to 144) resumption of anticoagulation in patients presenting with serious bleeding while on anticoagulants (excluding intracerebral bleeding) and with a thromboembolic risk evaluated as high (except mitral prostheses). The accumulated frequency of major hæmorrhage, thromboembolic events and deaths should be 26% in case of early resumption and 15% in case of late resumption, i.e. a relative risk reduction of 43%. Based on this hypothesis, to obtain 80% power with two-sided α being 5%, each group should include 208 patients, for a total of 416 patients.

EVALUATION CRITERIA: The main criteria in this study will be the accumulated one-month incidence of hæmorrhage recurrence, thromboembolic complications and deaths. It is a combined criterion associating:

  • Fatal hæmorrhage proven by autopsy or sudden deaths in a clinical context strongly suggestive of hæmorrhage
  • Fatal thromboembolic events proven by autopsy or imagery or sudden deaths in a clinical context strongly suggestive of thrombosis
  • Any clinically significant hæmorrhage leading to temporary (> 24 hours) or permanent withdrawal of anticoagulant treatment
  • Any symptomatic thromboembolic event in any territory, proven by imagery or surgery

These events will be validated by a committee for the validation of critical events blind to the date of anticoagulant treatment resumption. The secondary evaluation criteria will be symptomatic hæmorrhages, fatal or not, symptomatic thromboembolic incidents, fatal or not, and mortality at 1 month and 3 mont

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

14

Phase

  • Phase 3

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

      • Saint-Etienne, Frankreich, 42055
        • Service d'Urgences et de Réanimation Medicale, CHU de Saint-Etienne
      • Saint-etienne, Frankreich, 42000
        • CHU de Saint-Etienne

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre bis 90 Jahre (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:affiliated with or a beneficiary of a social security category

  • age > 18 years old
  • with major bleeding (ISTH) and highs thrombosis risk (ACCP 2008)
  • having signed the inform consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • intracranial bleeding
  • artificial heart valves
  • bleeding with hemostatic surgical
  • low and moderate thrombosis risk
  • INR>1.2
  • hemodynamic instability contra-indication to HBPM or HNF treatment
  • With previous history of HIT (heparin Inducted thrombopenia)
  • patient who need antiaggregant treatment before anticoagulant treatment
  • Hæmoglobin count < 8 g/dl or patients with hæmoglobin count < 10 g/dl combined with acute coronary syndrome or proven heart failure
  • pregnant
  • Polytraumatism
  • with curatif heparin before randomisation

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: UFH Early group
anticoagulant (UFH or LMWH) reintroduction at 48h to 72h after hemorrhage

Either curative dose, intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) so as to reach an anti-Xa activity between 0.3 and 0.7 IU/mL, lengthening the activated prothrombin time as determined by each centre according to the treatment area (depending on the coagulometer and reactants).

Or low-molecular-weight, curative dose, subcutaneous heparin (LMWH) so as to reach an anti-Xa activity corresponding to treatment areas as determined for each type of molecule (about 0.5 to 1 anti-Xa IU for most LMWHs, administered via 2 daily injections, and about 0.5 to 1.5 anti-Xa IU for tinzaparin, 1 injection daily).

Aktiver Komparator: UFH Late group
anticoagulant (UFH or LMWH) réintroduction 120h to 144h after hemorrhage

Either curative dose, intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) so as to reach an anti-Xa activity between 0.3 and 0.7 IU/mL, lengthening the activated prothrombin time as determined by each centre according to the treatment area (depending on the coagulometer and reactants).

Or low-molecular-weight, curative dose, subcutaneous heparin (LMWH) so as to reach an anti-Xa activity corresponding to treatment areas as determined for each type of molecule (about 0.5 to 1 anti-Xa IU for most LMWHs, administered via 2 daily injections, and about 0.5 to 1.5 anti-Xa IU for tinzaparin, 1 injection daily).

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
The main criterion in this study is the cumulated incidence of mortality, hæmorrhage recurrence and thromboembolic complications at 1 month
Zeitfenster: The main criterion in this study is the cumulated incidence of mortality, hæmorrhage recurrence and thromboembolic complications at 1 month

Fatal hæmorrhage proven by autopsy or sudden deaths in a clinical context strongly suggestive of hæmorrhage,

  • Fatal thromboembolic events proven by autopsy or imagery or sudden deaths in a clinical context strongly suggestive of thrombosis,
  • Any clinically significant hæmorrhage leading to temporary (> 24 hours) or permanent withdrawal of anticoagulant treatment,
  • Any symptomatic thromboembolic event in any territory, proven by imagery or surgery,
  • Any heart valve thrombosis or any intracavitary thrombus spotted by transesophageal echocardiogram performed systematically in patients with mechanical prosthesis or valvular rheumatic heart disease or AF.
The main criterion in this study is the cumulated incidence of mortality, hæmorrhage recurrence and thromboembolic complications at 1 month

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
-We will evaluate the risk/benefit balance of early versus late resumption of anticoagulant treatment,
Zeitfenster: We will evaluate at 1 month and at 3 monthsthe risk/benefit balance of early versus late resumption of anticoagulant treatment
  • Fatal hæmorrhages proven by autopsy or imagery or sudden deaths in a clinical context strongly suggestive of hæmorrhage,
  • Fatal thromboembolic events proven by autopsy or imagery or sudden deaths in a clinical context strongly suggestive of thrombosis,
  • Any clinically significant hæmorrhage leading to temporary (> 24 hours) or permanent withdrawal of anticoagulant treatment,
  • Any symptomatic thromboembolic event in any territory, proven by imagery or surgery,
  • Any heart valve thrombosis or any intracavitary thrombus spotted by transesophageal echocardiogram performed systematically in patients with mechanical prosthesis or valvular rheumatic heart disease or AF.
We will evaluate at 1 month and at 3 monthsthe risk/benefit balance of early versus late resumption of anticoagulant treatment

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Bernard Tardy, MD phD, CHU Saint Etienne

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn

1. Januar 2013

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Juni 2015

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Juni 2015

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

7. März 2014

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

17. März 2014

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

19. März 2014

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Schätzen)

10. März 2016

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

9. März 2016

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. März 2016

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • 1108097
  • 2012-000286-21 (EudraCT-Nummer)

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Produkt, das in den USA hergestellt und aus den USA exportiert wird

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren