Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Early Versus Late Resumption of Anticoagulation in Patients With Both High Thrombosis Risk and Major HEmoRrhage (RATHER)

9 de marzo de 2016 actualizado por: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne

Randomized Assay Evaluating the Risk/Benefit of Early Versus Late Resumption of Anticoagulation in Patients With Major, Non-trauma Related Hemorrhage Occurring While on Anticoagulant Treatment for a High Risk of Thrombosis.

In patients with a high thromboembolic risk, withdrawing anticoagulant treatment is recommended in some situations, including when major hæmorrhage occurs. But withdrawing treatment can be risky. In patients on a curative dose of anticoagulant medicine, treatment withdrawal heightens the risk of thromboembolic events occurring, with potentially major consequences. For instance, mechanical valve thrombosis is fatal in 15% of patients. Resumption of anticoagulation is therefore critical in patients at high risk for thromboembolic events.

However, in these patients having presented major hæmorrhage, resumption of anticoagulation heightens the risk of hæmorrhage recurrence. This risk is even higher when the original hæmorrhage was not accessible via surgical, endoscopic or endoluminal hemostasis.

As far as investigators know, there is no data in the literature to rely on when the major hæmorrhage is not accessible via hemostatic intervention and the risk of thrombosis is high. When confronted with patients who need anticoagulation but have a high risk of hæmorrhage recurrence, the question of when treatment should be resumed has not been resolved. This is why investigators propose to conduct a randomised comparative study to evaluate two treatment strategies - early resumption (H48 to H72) versus late resumption (H120 to H144) of anticoagulation.

MAIN OBJECTIVE: The main objective of the present study is to evaluate in terms of bleeding risk, thrombosis risk and mortality at one month, the effect of early vs. late resumption of anticoagulation in patients having presented with serious hæmorrhage while on curative-dose anticoagulants and facing a high thromboembolic risk.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Condiciones

Descripción detallada

STUDY DESIGN: This is a comparative, randomised, open study assessing after 1 month and 3 months the effect of early (H48 to 72) versus late (H120 to 144) resumption of anticoagulation in patients presenting with serious bleeding while on anticoagulants (excluding intracerebral bleeding) and with a thromboembolic risk evaluated as high (except mitral prostheses). The accumulated frequency of major hæmorrhage, thromboembolic events and deaths should be 26% in case of early resumption and 15% in case of late resumption, i.e. a relative risk reduction of 43%. Based on this hypothesis, to obtain 80% power with two-sided α being 5%, each group should include 208 patients, for a total of 416 patients.

EVALUATION CRITERIA: The main criteria in this study will be the accumulated one-month incidence of hæmorrhage recurrence, thromboembolic complications and deaths. It is a combined criterion associating:

  • Fatal hæmorrhage proven by autopsy or sudden deaths in a clinical context strongly suggestive of hæmorrhage
  • Fatal thromboembolic events proven by autopsy or imagery or sudden deaths in a clinical context strongly suggestive of thrombosis
  • Any clinically significant hæmorrhage leading to temporary (> 24 hours) or permanent withdrawal of anticoagulant treatment
  • Any symptomatic thromboembolic event in any territory, proven by imagery or surgery

These events will be validated by a committee for the validation of critical events blind to the date of anticoagulant treatment resumption. The secondary evaluation criteria will be symptomatic hæmorrhages, fatal or not, symptomatic thromboembolic incidents, fatal or not, and mortality at 1 month and 3 mont

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

14

Fase

  • Fase 3

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Saint-Etienne, Francia, 42055
        • Service d'Urgences et de Réanimation Medicale, CHU de Saint-Etienne
      • Saint-etienne, Francia, 42000
        • CHU de Saint-Etienne

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años a 90 años (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:affiliated with or a beneficiary of a social security category

  • age > 18 years old
  • with major bleeding (ISTH) and highs thrombosis risk (ACCP 2008)
  • having signed the inform consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • intracranial bleeding
  • artificial heart valves
  • bleeding with hemostatic surgical
  • low and moderate thrombosis risk
  • INR>1.2
  • hemodynamic instability contra-indication to HBPM or HNF treatment
  • With previous history of HIT (heparin Inducted thrombopenia)
  • patient who need antiaggregant treatment before anticoagulant treatment
  • Hæmoglobin count < 8 g/dl or patients with hæmoglobin count < 10 g/dl combined with acute coronary syndrome or proven heart failure
  • pregnant
  • Polytraumatism
  • with curatif heparin before randomisation

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: UFH Early group
anticoagulant (UFH or LMWH) reintroduction at 48h to 72h after hemorrhage

Either curative dose, intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) so as to reach an anti-Xa activity between 0.3 and 0.7 IU/mL, lengthening the activated prothrombin time as determined by each centre according to the treatment area (depending on the coagulometer and reactants).

Or low-molecular-weight, curative dose, subcutaneous heparin (LMWH) so as to reach an anti-Xa activity corresponding to treatment areas as determined for each type of molecule (about 0.5 to 1 anti-Xa IU for most LMWHs, administered via 2 daily injections, and about 0.5 to 1.5 anti-Xa IU for tinzaparin, 1 injection daily).

Comparador activo: UFH Late group
anticoagulant (UFH or LMWH) réintroduction 120h to 144h after hemorrhage

Either curative dose, intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) so as to reach an anti-Xa activity between 0.3 and 0.7 IU/mL, lengthening the activated prothrombin time as determined by each centre according to the treatment area (depending on the coagulometer and reactants).

Or low-molecular-weight, curative dose, subcutaneous heparin (LMWH) so as to reach an anti-Xa activity corresponding to treatment areas as determined for each type of molecule (about 0.5 to 1 anti-Xa IU for most LMWHs, administered via 2 daily injections, and about 0.5 to 1.5 anti-Xa IU for tinzaparin, 1 injection daily).

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
The main criterion in this study is the cumulated incidence of mortality, hæmorrhage recurrence and thromboembolic complications at 1 month
Periodo de tiempo: The main criterion in this study is the cumulated incidence of mortality, hæmorrhage recurrence and thromboembolic complications at 1 month

Fatal hæmorrhage proven by autopsy or sudden deaths in a clinical context strongly suggestive of hæmorrhage,

  • Fatal thromboembolic events proven by autopsy or imagery or sudden deaths in a clinical context strongly suggestive of thrombosis,
  • Any clinically significant hæmorrhage leading to temporary (> 24 hours) or permanent withdrawal of anticoagulant treatment,
  • Any symptomatic thromboembolic event in any territory, proven by imagery or surgery,
  • Any heart valve thrombosis or any intracavitary thrombus spotted by transesophageal echocardiogram performed systematically in patients with mechanical prosthesis or valvular rheumatic heart disease or AF.
The main criterion in this study is the cumulated incidence of mortality, hæmorrhage recurrence and thromboembolic complications at 1 month

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
-We will evaluate the risk/benefit balance of early versus late resumption of anticoagulant treatment,
Periodo de tiempo: We will evaluate at 1 month and at 3 monthsthe risk/benefit balance of early versus late resumption of anticoagulant treatment
  • Fatal hæmorrhages proven by autopsy or imagery or sudden deaths in a clinical context strongly suggestive of hæmorrhage,
  • Fatal thromboembolic events proven by autopsy or imagery or sudden deaths in a clinical context strongly suggestive of thrombosis,
  • Any clinically significant hæmorrhage leading to temporary (> 24 hours) or permanent withdrawal of anticoagulant treatment,
  • Any symptomatic thromboembolic event in any territory, proven by imagery or surgery,
  • Any heart valve thrombosis or any intracavitary thrombus spotted by transesophageal echocardiogram performed systematically in patients with mechanical prosthesis or valvular rheumatic heart disease or AF.
We will evaluate at 1 month and at 3 monthsthe risk/benefit balance of early versus late resumption of anticoagulant treatment

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Bernard Tardy, MD phD, CHU Saint Etienne

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de enero de 2013

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de junio de 2015

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de junio de 2015

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

7 de marzo de 2014

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

17 de marzo de 2014

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

19 de marzo de 2014

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

10 de marzo de 2016

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

9 de marzo de 2016

Última verificación

1 de marzo de 2016

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Palabras clave

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 1108097
  • 2012-000286-21 (Número EudraCT)

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir