Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Improving Medication Adherence in the Alabama Black Belt

6. Oktober 2020 aktualisiert von: Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Medication adherence is especially critical in regions like rural Alabama, where residents have among the worst health outcomes in the US. This project was designed in collaboration with our community member partners and builds on a 5-year partnership of community-engaged research on diabetes peer coaching interventions and our experience with peer storytelling. The investigators will test the hypothesis that an intervention designed within the Corbin and Strauss framework can improve adherence and health outcomes compared to usual care.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Improving medication adherence is one of the greatest challenges in modern medicine. Despite decades of research on the topic, as many as half of patients with chronic diseases are not taking medications as recommended, and costs of nonadherence have been estimated at $290 billion annually. One reason for this persistent finding could be that interventions rarely acknowledge medications within the larger context of the lived experience of illness. Drawing on hundreds of patient interviews, Corbin and Strauss showed that chronic illness is a fundamentally destabilizing influence that forces us to confront the potential limitations of our "new", chronically ill self. Accepting our illness may be a crucial step in embracing medication adherence and other self-management behaviors as ways to restore balance following this disruption. The Corbin and Strauss framework is not often used to develop and test interventions to improve medication adherence, and this is the central objective of this proposal.

Medication adherence is especially critical in regions like rural Alabama, where residents have among the worst health outcomes in the US. Rates of cardiovascular mortality, diabetes and obesity are very high, but resources are scarce and the area's predominately black residents have deep-seated mistrust of the healthcare system (the region includes Tuskegee, site of the infamous syphilis study). This project was designed in collaboration with our community member partners and builds on a 5-year partnership of community-engaged research on diabetes peer coaching interventions and our experience with peer storytelling. The investigators will test the hypothesis that an intervention designed within the Corbin and Strauss framework can improve adherence and health outcomes compared to usual care. Our Aims are:

Aim 1: With our community partners, using qualitative research methods, build on already developed culturally tailored education material to develop the medication adherence intervention. The intervention will consist of educational DVDs with integrated storytelling about how community members accepted their disease and overcame barriers to medication adherence, plus one-on-one telephonic peer coaching. Activities include conducting focus groups with patients; creating the DVDs and the coaching intervention protocol; training peer coaches; and pilot testing.

Aim 2: Conduct a randomized controlled trial with 500 individuals with type 2 diabetes and medication nonadherence. The trial will compare the effect of usual care and the intervention on medication adherence and physiologic risk factors including A1c, blood pressure and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (primary outcomes), and quality of life and self-efficacy (secondary outcomes).

This innovative approach would be a major shift in how patients are helped in under resourced areas living with chronic diseases commit to taking medications, improving health and eventually reducing health disparities.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

473

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, Vereinigte Staaten, 35210
        • Univeristy of Alabama at Birmingham

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

19 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adults
  • type 2 diabetes
  • taking medications for diabetes
  • medication non adherent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • nursing home residence
  • plans to move away in the next year
  • advanced illnesses such as hemodialysis, cancer or dementia

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Peer Coaching
The intervention participants will receive the Living Well with Diabetes Program. The program will consist of educational DVDs with integrated storytelling about how community members accepted their disease and overcame barriers to medication adherence, plus one-on-one telephonic peer coaching.
The intervention participants will receive the Living Well with Diabetes Program. The program will consist of educational DVDs with integrated storytelling about how community members accepted their disease and overcame barriers to medication adherence, plus one-on-one telephonic peer coaching
Kein Eingriff: Usual Care
At enrollment, the investigators will provide an educational DVD on general health and wellness topics including vaccination, cancer screening, osteoporosis and other topics not related to diabetes care. There will be no peer storytelling on these DVDs.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change in Self Reported Medication Adherence
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 6 months
Patient-reported adherence to medications as a medication adherence score, from 0-3, where a higher score indicates worse adherence.
Baseline, 6 months
Change in Percentage of HbA1c
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 6 months
Hemoglobin A1c test to identify the average amount of glucose (sugar) present in a patient's blood.
Baseline, 6 months
Change in Blood Pressure
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 6 months
2 BP measures were taken 1 minute apart using a LifeSource UA-789 digital blood pressure monitor.
Baseline, 6 months
Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 6 months
Finger stick, spectrophotometer to measure cholesterol level.
Baseline, 6 months

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change in Quality of Life as Assessed With the Short Form 12- Mental Component
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 6 months
Short Form-12 Mental Component and Physical Component Summary scores range from 0-100; higher scores indicate greater quality of life.
Baseline, 6 months
Change in Quality of Life as Assessed With the Short Form-12- Physical Component
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 6 months
Short Form-12 Mental Component and Physical Component Summary scores range from 0-100; higher scores indicate greater quality of life.
Baseline, 6 months
Change in Medication Use Self-efficacy Score as Measured by SEAMS Scale and the Perceived Diabetes Self-Management Scale, Which is Associated With A1c
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 6 months
Medication use self-efficacy scores for range from 13-39; higher scores indicate higher levels of self-efficacy for medication adherence.
Baseline, 6 months
Change in Diabetes-Specific Quality of Life
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 6 months
Diabetes specific quality of life will be assessed using the validated Diabetes Distress Scale.The DDS is a 17-item instrument that measures diabetes-related emotional distress. Participants rate the degree to which each item is problematic for them on a 6-point Likert scale, from 1 (no problem) to 6 (serious problem). A score of 3 or greater = moderate distress.
Baseline, 6 months
Number of Physician Office Visits 6 Months
Zeitfenster: 6 months
6 months
Number of Hospital Stays at 6 Months
Zeitfenster: 6 months
6 months
Number of Emergency Visits at 6 Months
Zeitfenster: 6 months
6 months
Change in Diabetes Medication Counts
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 6 months
Change in number of diabetes medications.
Baseline, 6 months

Andere Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change in Medication Beliefs- Harm (Beliefs That Medications Are Harmful)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 6 months
Beliefs about medications questionnaire scores range from 5-25; higher scores indicate stronger beliefs.
Baseline, 6 months
Change in Medication Beliefs- Overuse (Concerns About the Way Doctors Use Medications)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 6 months
Beliefs about medications questionnaire scores range from 5-25; higher scores indicate stronger beliefs.
Baseline, 6 months
Change in Medication Beliefs-Necessity (Beliefs About the Necessity of Medications)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 6 months
Beliefs about medications questionnaire scores range from 5-25; higher scores indicate stronger beliefs.
Baseline, 6 months
Change in Medication Beliefs- Concerns (Concerns About the Negative Effects of Medications)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 6 months
Beliefs about medications questionnaire scores range from 5-25; higher scores indicate stronger beliefs.
Baseline, 6 months

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Monika M Safford, MD, Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

1. April 2016

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

31. Januar 2019

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

31. Januar 2019

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

14. Oktober 2014

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

22. Oktober 2014

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

24. Oktober 2014

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

29. Oktober 2020

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

6. Oktober 2020

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Oktober 2020

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • PCORI-R-AD-1306-03565

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Data will stay at UAB

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren