Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Improving Medication Adherence in the Alabama Black Belt

6 de octubre de 2020 actualizado por: Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Medication adherence is especially critical in regions like rural Alabama, where residents have among the worst health outcomes in the US. This project was designed in collaboration with our community member partners and builds on a 5-year partnership of community-engaged research on diabetes peer coaching interventions and our experience with peer storytelling. The investigators will test the hypothesis that an intervention designed within the Corbin and Strauss framework can improve adherence and health outcomes compared to usual care.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Improving medication adherence is one of the greatest challenges in modern medicine. Despite decades of research on the topic, as many as half of patients with chronic diseases are not taking medications as recommended, and costs of nonadherence have been estimated at $290 billion annually. One reason for this persistent finding could be that interventions rarely acknowledge medications within the larger context of the lived experience of illness. Drawing on hundreds of patient interviews, Corbin and Strauss showed that chronic illness is a fundamentally destabilizing influence that forces us to confront the potential limitations of our "new", chronically ill self. Accepting our illness may be a crucial step in embracing medication adherence and other self-management behaviors as ways to restore balance following this disruption. The Corbin and Strauss framework is not often used to develop and test interventions to improve medication adherence, and this is the central objective of this proposal.

Medication adherence is especially critical in regions like rural Alabama, where residents have among the worst health outcomes in the US. Rates of cardiovascular mortality, diabetes and obesity are very high, but resources are scarce and the area's predominately black residents have deep-seated mistrust of the healthcare system (the region includes Tuskegee, site of the infamous syphilis study). This project was designed in collaboration with our community member partners and builds on a 5-year partnership of community-engaged research on diabetes peer coaching interventions and our experience with peer storytelling. The investigators will test the hypothesis that an intervention designed within the Corbin and Strauss framework can improve adherence and health outcomes compared to usual care. Our Aims are:

Aim 1: With our community partners, using qualitative research methods, build on already developed culturally tailored education material to develop the medication adherence intervention. The intervention will consist of educational DVDs with integrated storytelling about how community members accepted their disease and overcame barriers to medication adherence, plus one-on-one telephonic peer coaching. Activities include conducting focus groups with patients; creating the DVDs and the coaching intervention protocol; training peer coaches; and pilot testing.

Aim 2: Conduct a randomized controlled trial with 500 individuals with type 2 diabetes and medication nonadherence. The trial will compare the effect of usual care and the intervention on medication adherence and physiologic risk factors including A1c, blood pressure and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (primary outcomes), and quality of life and self-efficacy (secondary outcomes).

This innovative approach would be a major shift in how patients are helped in under resourced areas living with chronic diseases commit to taking medications, improving health and eventually reducing health disparities.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

473

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, Estados Unidos, 35210
        • Univeristy of Alabama at Birmingham

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

19 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adults
  • type 2 diabetes
  • taking medications for diabetes
  • medication non adherent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • nursing home residence
  • plans to move away in the next year
  • advanced illnesses such as hemodialysis, cancer or dementia

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Peer Coaching
The intervention participants will receive the Living Well with Diabetes Program. The program will consist of educational DVDs with integrated storytelling about how community members accepted their disease and overcame barriers to medication adherence, plus one-on-one telephonic peer coaching.
The intervention participants will receive the Living Well with Diabetes Program. The program will consist of educational DVDs with integrated storytelling about how community members accepted their disease and overcame barriers to medication adherence, plus one-on-one telephonic peer coaching
Sin intervención: Usual Care
At enrollment, the investigators will provide an educational DVD on general health and wellness topics including vaccination, cancer screening, osteoporosis and other topics not related to diabetes care. There will be no peer storytelling on these DVDs.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change in Self Reported Medication Adherence
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 months
Patient-reported adherence to medications as a medication adherence score, from 0-3, where a higher score indicates worse adherence.
Baseline, 6 months
Change in Percentage of HbA1c
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 months
Hemoglobin A1c test to identify the average amount of glucose (sugar) present in a patient's blood.
Baseline, 6 months
Change in Blood Pressure
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 months
2 BP measures were taken 1 minute apart using a LifeSource UA-789 digital blood pressure monitor.
Baseline, 6 months
Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 months
Finger stick, spectrophotometer to measure cholesterol level.
Baseline, 6 months

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change in Quality of Life as Assessed With the Short Form 12- Mental Component
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 months
Short Form-12 Mental Component and Physical Component Summary scores range from 0-100; higher scores indicate greater quality of life.
Baseline, 6 months
Change in Quality of Life as Assessed With the Short Form-12- Physical Component
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 months
Short Form-12 Mental Component and Physical Component Summary scores range from 0-100; higher scores indicate greater quality of life.
Baseline, 6 months
Change in Medication Use Self-efficacy Score as Measured by SEAMS Scale and the Perceived Diabetes Self-Management Scale, Which is Associated With A1c
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 months
Medication use self-efficacy scores for range from 13-39; higher scores indicate higher levels of self-efficacy for medication adherence.
Baseline, 6 months
Change in Diabetes-Specific Quality of Life
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 months
Diabetes specific quality of life will be assessed using the validated Diabetes Distress Scale.The DDS is a 17-item instrument that measures diabetes-related emotional distress. Participants rate the degree to which each item is problematic for them on a 6-point Likert scale, from 1 (no problem) to 6 (serious problem). A score of 3 or greater = moderate distress.
Baseline, 6 months
Number of Physician Office Visits 6 Months
Periodo de tiempo: 6 months
6 months
Number of Hospital Stays at 6 Months
Periodo de tiempo: 6 months
6 months
Number of Emergency Visits at 6 Months
Periodo de tiempo: 6 months
6 months
Change in Diabetes Medication Counts
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 months
Change in number of diabetes medications.
Baseline, 6 months

Otras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change in Medication Beliefs- Harm (Beliefs That Medications Are Harmful)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 months
Beliefs about medications questionnaire scores range from 5-25; higher scores indicate stronger beliefs.
Baseline, 6 months
Change in Medication Beliefs- Overuse (Concerns About the Way Doctors Use Medications)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 months
Beliefs about medications questionnaire scores range from 5-25; higher scores indicate stronger beliefs.
Baseline, 6 months
Change in Medication Beliefs-Necessity (Beliefs About the Necessity of Medications)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 months
Beliefs about medications questionnaire scores range from 5-25; higher scores indicate stronger beliefs.
Baseline, 6 months
Change in Medication Beliefs- Concerns (Concerns About the Negative Effects of Medications)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 months
Beliefs about medications questionnaire scores range from 5-25; higher scores indicate stronger beliefs.
Baseline, 6 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Monika M Safford, MD, Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de abril de 2016

Finalización primaria (Actual)

31 de enero de 2019

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

31 de enero de 2019

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

14 de octubre de 2014

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

22 de octubre de 2014

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

24 de octubre de 2014

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

29 de octubre de 2020

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

6 de octubre de 2020

Última verificación

1 de octubre de 2020

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • PCORI-R-AD-1306-03565

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Descripción del plan IPD

Data will stay at UAB

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Diabetes mellitus

Ensayos clínicos sobre Living Well with Diabetes Program

3
Suscribir