Educational Model for Cardiac Patients
26. März 2020 aktualisiert von: Natássia Condilo Pitta, University of Sao Paulo
Effect of an Educational Model on Physical Activity in Individuals Undergoing the First Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Randomized Clinical Trial
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of an educational model, which included cardiac rehabilitation with emphasis on physical activity and telephone follow up, with the usual management of individuals undergoing to first percutaneous coronary intervention, in relation to physical activity five until seven months after discharge.
Studienübersicht
Status
Abgeschlossen
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Randomized controlled trial (RCT) at a public teaching hospital, which has specialized care for CAD in Ribeirão Preto, state of São Paulo, Brazil. The intervention group received usual care and an educational programme and the control group received only usual care.
A researcher (who didn't had contact with the patients) generated the random allocation in SPSS software, concealing it from the investigators in sequentially numbered, sealed and opaque envelopes.
Another researcher performed the individual interview with each participant (baseline) and aplied the instruments of socialdemographic data, physical activity, ansiety and depression, perceived health status and selfefficacy to practice of physical activity. At the end of the interviewThe same researcher opened the envelope to allocate the participants to either intervention or control group. The participants of intervention group remained with the researcher to receive the intervention.
The educational programme consisted of four booklets entitled 1. Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty, 2. Going home after your coronary angioplasty, 3. How to take care of your heart and your health, and 4. How to practice physical activities. The educational programme included the telephone follow-up that contained three calls to motivate the participants to change their lifestyle and clarify doubts. The contents of the booklets were explained step by step to the participants by the researcher who conducted the interviews.
Studientyp
Interventionell
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
127
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.
Studienorte
-
-
São Paulo
-
Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brasilien, 14040-902
- Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto da Universidade de Sao Paulo
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
18 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Nein
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Alle
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients (18 years or more) of both genders
- Patients undergoing the first percutaneous coronary intervention
- Patients who had a properly functioning home phone line
Exclusion Criteria:
- No cognitive conditions to participate (assessed by the ability to inform the name, current date, day of the week, place, age and place of birth confirmed by the participant's identification document)
- Who did not have clinical or physical conditions to answer the questionnaires (individuals with dyspnea and / or mental confusion)
- Who reported difficulties to speak on the phone (hearing loss)
- Who had sequelae that could influence activities of daily living (limb amputation or paralysis)
- Who had a contraindication to physical exercise, prescribed by the doctor, and who already participated in a supervised cardiac rehabilitation program
Studienplan
Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Unterstützende Pflege
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Aktiver Komparator: Usual Care
At discharge, paticipants received guidance from health professionals.
The paticipants had a medical return five to seven months after the percutaneous coronary intervention.
|
Hospital health professionals offered orientation on care after discharge
|
|
Experimental: Educational model + follow up
The paticipants received the hospital's instructions at discharge and participated in the educational program (booklets with telephone follow-up).
The paticipants had a medical return five to seven months after discharge
|
Orientation from health professionals at discharge, educational program with explanation of booklets and telephone follow-up (three calls)
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in physical activity level from baseline to five to seven months
Zeitfenster: baseline and five to seven months
|
The "Baecke Questionnaire of Habitual Physical Activity" was developed by Baecke, Burema and Frijters (1982) and validated for the Brazilian population by Florindo et al. (2004, 2006).
The instrument has three dimensions: occupational physical activity (eight questions), physical activity during leisure time (four questions) and leisure and locomotion activities (four questions), totaling 16 questions.
Higher scores indicate a higher level of physical activity.
This questionnaire was used to collect the data at baseline and five to seven months after hospital discharge.
|
baseline and five to seven months
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in symptoms of anxiety and depression from baseline to five to seven months
Zeitfenster: baseline and five to seven months
|
The questionnaire "Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale" was developed by Zigmond and Snaith (1983) and validated and adapted to Portuguese by Botega et al. (1995).
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale contains 14 multiple choice questions, divided into two subscales: anxiety and depression (composed of seven items each).
Higher scores indicate more symptoms of anxiety and depression.
This questionnaire was used to collect the data at baseline and five to seven months after hospital discharge.
|
baseline and five to seven months
|
|
Change in perceived health status from baseline to five to seven months
Zeitfenster: baseline and five to seven months
|
The questionnaire "Medical Outcomes Survey 36 - Item Short-Form" developed by Ware and Sherboune (1992).
The investigators used the version licensed by Quality Metric Incorporated (MARUISH, 2011) for use in surveys in Brazil.
The Medical Outcomes Survey 36 - Item Short-Form is a multidimensional questionnaire composed of 36 items that evaluate eight health concepts: functional capacity, physical aspects, pain, general health, vitality, social aspects, emotional aspects, mental health and a comparative question that evaluate the current health conditions with one year ago.
Higher values indicate better perceived health status.
This questionnaire was used to collect the data at baseline and five to seven months after hospital discharge.
|
baseline and five to seven months
|
|
Change in self-efficacy for physical activity from baseline to five to seven months
Zeitfenster: baseline and five to seven months
|
The questionnaire "Escala de Autoeficácia Para Prática de Atividade Física" developed by Rech et al. (2011) for Brazilian adults and by Borges et al. (2015) that used in the elderly population.
This questionnaire was elaborated from two specific scales of self-efficacy for the practice of physical exercise, proposed by Sallis et al. (1988) and Bandura (2006).
We used the Brazilian adult version (RECH et al., 2011) which contains two domains with five items each in which the answers are dichotomous ( "no" versus "yes").
Higher scores indicate better self-efficacy for physical activity.
The instrument was used to collect the data at baseline and five to seven months after hospital discharge.
|
baseline and five to seven months
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.
Sponsor
Ermittler
- Studienstuhl: Lidia A Rossi, PhD, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
1. August 2017
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
20. Dezember 2018
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
30. Januar 2020
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
24. November 2016
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
28. November 2016
Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)
29. November 2016
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
30. März 2020
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
26. März 2020
Zuletzt verifiziert
1. März 2020
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- 51805715.0.0000.5393
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
NEIN
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Nein
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Nein
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .