- ICH GCP
- US-Register für klinische Studien
- Klinische Studie NCT07279363
Deaf CBT-TS zur Verringerung des Suizidrisikos
Kognitive Verhaltenstherapie zur Behandlungssuche zur Verbesserung der Therapieteilnahme und Verringerung des Suizidrisikos bei gehörlosen Personen
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a short, Zoom-based intervention, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Treatment-Seeking for Deaf Individuals (Deaf CBT-TS) can change beliefs about mental health treatment and increase treatment-seeking behaviors in Deaf adults with untreated mental health or alcohol use problems. It will also see if Deaf CBT-TS may reduce suicide risk and explore factors that may increase the effectiveness of Deaf CBT-TS. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does Deaf CBT-TS increase positive beliefs about treatment and increase treatment-seeking behaviors?
- Does Deaf CBT-TS increase hope and reduce mental health symptoms, suicide ideation, and alcohol use?
- Is Deaf CBT-TS more effective for individuals with less cultural stress compared to those with high levels of cultural stress?
- Is Deaf CBT-TS more effective for Deaf individuals in residential areas with more Deaf resources than those with less Deaf resources? Researchers will compare individuals who complete Deaf CBT-TS to those on a waitlist to see if Deaf CBT-TS works to increase positive beliefs about treatment and treatment-seeking behaviors.
Participants will:
- Complete a baseline assessment including demographic information, measures of hope, general mental health and functioning, alcohol use, suicide ideation, cultural stress, and beliefs about treatment.
- Receive Deaf CBT-TS (2 sessions) or be placed on a waitlist with the option of receiving Deaf CBT-Ts after 4 months
- Complete two follow-up assessments in 2 and 4 months.
Studienübersicht
Status
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
The proposed project is a two-arm randomized controlled trial of a zoom-based intervention, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Treatment-Seeking for Deaf Individuals (Deaf CBT-TS) vs. a waitlist control, with follow-up at 2 and 4 months to assess the intervention's ability to modify beliefs about treatment (intervention principles) and increase treatment-seeking behaviors (target mechanism), as well as explore its potential to increase hope and reduce indicators of suicide risk. The investigators will also examine factors that may impact the efficacy of the intervention including levels of Deaf acculturative stress and subject residential location (Rochester, access to URMC resources vs. other locations across the U.S. with less Deaf resources). Subjects are 110 Deaf adults who report American Sign Language as their primary method of communication, have clinically significant symptoms of a mental health disorder (depression, anxiety, PTSD, insomnia, or alcohol use disorder), and are not engaged in professional mental health or alcohol specialty treatment (e.g., counseling, psychiatric services). The investigators will oversample subjects with recent suicide ideation (50%). Half of the subjects will be recruited from Rochester and the other half nationally. The Specific Aims include (1) to test whether Deaf CBT-TS engages the intervention principles and target mechanism (co-primary outcomes: changes in behavioral, normative, and control beliefs about treatment; and initiation of professional treatment); (2) to explore changes in hope and reductions in indicators of suicide risk (mental health symptoms, alcohol use, and severity of suicide ideation); and (3) to identify factors that could impact the efficacy of Deaf CBT-TS (Deaf acculturative stress and residential location).
Subjects will complete a baseline assessment including demographic information, measures of Deaf acculturative stress, hope, general mental health and functioning, alcohol use, suicide ideation, and beliefs about treatment. Subjects who complete the baseline assessment will be randomized to Deaf CBT-TS or a waitlist control, using stratified randomization based on sex assigned at birth, prior suicide attempt, and residential location (Rochester vs. other U.S. locations). During study assessments, all subjects will receive suicide risk assessments using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), with actions commensurate with risk level, and a list of Deaf crisis intervention resources. The study coordinator will review each resource on the list and explain how to use them. Study conditions are Deaf CBT-TS (2 sessions) and waitlist control. Deaf CBT-TS involves 2 intervention sessions lasting up to 90 minutes each. The follow-up assessments (2 and 4 months) include the baseline measures of hope, general mental health and functioning, alcohol use, suicide ideation, and beliefs about treatment, as well as a treatment utilization survey to assess the subjects' use of professional mental health and alcohol specialty treatment since their last study visit. Subjects in the waitlist control group who have not engaged in professional mental health or alcohol treatment will be offered the Deaf CBT-TS intervention after their 4-month follow-up assessment.
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienkontakt
- Name: Aileen Aldalur, Ph.D. Clinical Psychology
- Telefonnummer: 585-371-6125 (call only)
- E-Mail: aileen_aldalur@urmc.rochester.edu
Studienorte
-
-
New York
-
Rochester, New York, Vereinigte Staaten, 14642
- University of Rochester Medical Center
-
Kontakt:
- Aileen Aldalur, Ph.D. Clinical Psychology
- Telefonnummer: 585-371-6125
- E-Mail: aileen_aldalur@urmc.rochester.edu
-
Hauptermittler:
- Aileen Aldalur, Ph.D. Clincial Psychology
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Beschreibung
Inclusion criteria:
- adult (aged 18 years or older)
- Self-identify as Deaf or hard of hearing (any degree of hearing loss)
- Primary method of communication is American Sign Language
- Positive screen for one or more mental health disorders including depression (PHQ-9 > 10), anxiety (GAD-7 > 10), posttraumatic stress disorder (PCL-5 > 31), insomnia (ISI > 15), or alcohol use disorder (AUDIT > 16)
- No current professional mental health or alcohol specialty treatment (e.g., counseling, psychiatric services) per standardized self-report
- Access to video chat technology with internet and webcam.
Exclusion criteria:
- unable to communicate with the researcher in American Sign Language
- current alcohol withdrawal necessitating medical evaluation
- current psychiatric impairment necessitating emergency services or inpatient admission (i.e., imminent danger of harm to self or others)
- unable to comprehend the nature of the study
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Behandlung
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Kein Eingriff: Waitlist Control Group
During study assessments, subjects will receive a suicide risk assessment, with actions commensurate with risk level, and a list of Deaf crisis intervention resources with instructions provided on how to use them. The list of resources contains crisis hotlines that are accessible for Deaf individuals including text-based options (e.g., Crisis Text line, 988 text number) and options to talk with counselors in ASL (e.g., 988 ASL services, DeafLEAd Crisis Line). The study coordinator will review each resource and explain their use. Subjects will be emailed this list of resources after their assessment. Other brief interventions that could be provided based on subject presentation include encouraging subjects to seek social support and share their thoughts with others; elicitation of coping strategies; and lethal means safety planning. |
|
|
Experimental: Deaf CBT-TS Intervention Group
Intervention Group |
Deaf CBT-TS is a two-session (90 minutes each) Zoom-based intervention designed to target a change in the beliefs that influence whether or not someone initiates mental health treatment. The intervention works by modifying problematic beliefs, providing accurate information about treatment, and problem-solving barriers. The first session is structured in four phases: (1) history of symptoms and current functioning, (2) coping strategies, (3) evaluation and modification of treatment beliefs using CBT strategies, and (4) action planning. Subjects are provided a list of resources for seeking treatment, as well as a personalized search of treatment options (conducted by the interventionist) in their area based on their insurance and language preference. The second session occurs within 3 weeks and is designed to check in with subjects regarding progress on their action plan, provide assistance in identifying treatment options, and problem-solve barriers |
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Beliefs About Treatment
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 2-month follow-up
|
The Perceptions About Services Scale for the Deaf (PASS-D) will be used to assess participants' behavioral, normative, and control beliefs about treatment. The Behavioral Belief subscale has 10 items assessing advantages vs. disadvantages of seeking treatment, the Normative Belief subscale has 7 items assessing community support vs. opposition to seeking treatment, and the Control Beliefs subscale has 26 items assessing facilitators vs. barriers to seeking treatment. Each item is rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 7 (Strongly Agree) with higher scores indicating more positive beliefs. Items for each subscale will be totaled. |
Baseline to 2-month follow-up
|
|
Beliefs About Treatment (4 months)
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 4-month follow-up
|
The Perceptions About Services Scale for the Deaf (PASS-D) will be used to assess participants' behavioral, normative, and control beliefs about treatment. The Behavioral Belief subscale has 10 items assessing advantages vs. disadvantages of seeking treatment, the Normative Belief subscale has 7 items assessing community support vs. opposition to seeking treatment, and the Control Beliefs subscale has 26 items assessing facilitators vs. barriers to seeking treatment. Each item is rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 7 (Strongly Agree) with higher scores indicating more positive beliefs. Items for each subscale will be totaled. |
Baseline to 4-month follow-up
|
|
Treatment Initiation
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 2-month follow-up
|
A Treatment Utilization Survey will assess use of 12 treatment services, number of sessions attended, current treatment status (active vs. completed), reasons for seeking/not seeking treatment, and any barriers experienced. Treatment Initiation will be measured with a binary variable. Subjects who have attended, scheduled, or contacted professional treatment services will be coded as 1 (initiated treatment) and those who have not attended or scheduled professional treatment services will be coded as 0 (not initiated). |
Baseline to 2-month follow-up
|
|
Treatment Initiation (4 months)
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 4-month follow-up
|
A Treatment Utilization Survey will assess use of 12 treatment services, number of sessions attended, current treatment status (active vs. completed), reasons for seeking/not seeking treatment, and any barriers experienced. Treatment Initiation will be measured with a binary variable. Subjects who have attended, scheduled, or contacted professional treatment services will be coded as 1 (initiated treatment) and those who have not attended or scheduled professional treatment services will be coded as 0 (not initiated). |
Baseline to 4-month follow-up
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Hope
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 2-months follow-up
|
Hope will be assessed via the Beck Hopelessness Scale. The scale has 20 items scored as True or False. Scores of 1 or 0 are assigned to each item depending on the subject's response and the directionality of the item. The scores are summed with for a total score ranging from 0 - 20 and higher scores indicating more hopelessness. |
Baseline to 2-months follow-up
|
|
Hope (4-months)
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 4-months follow-up
|
Hope will be assessed via the Beck Hopelessness Scale. The scale has 20 items scored as True or False. Scores of 1 or 0 are assigned to each item depending on the subject's response and the directionality of the item. The scores are summed with for a total score ranging from 0 - 20 and higher scores indicating more hopelessness. |
Baseline to 4-months follow-up
|
|
General Mental Health
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 2-months follow-up
|
General mental health will be assessed via the PROMIS-29 V2.0. The scale has 29 items divided across 8 subscales. Three of the subscales are focused on general mental health: Anxiety, Depression, and Ability to Participate in Social Roles. These subscales each have four items rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much) with higher scores indicating worse mental health functioning. Scores for each of the subscales will be summed and converted to T-scores. The T-scores for the three subscales will then be summed for a total score representing general mental health functioning. |
Baseline to 2-months follow-up
|
|
General Mental Health (4 months)
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 4-month follow-up
|
General mental health will be assessed via the PROMIS-29 V2.0. The scale has 29 items divided across 8 subscales. Three of the subscales are focused on general mental health: Anxiety, Depression, and Ability to Participate in Social Roles. These subscales each have four items rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much) with higher scores indicating worse mental health functioning. Scores for each of the subscales will be summed and converted to T-scores. The T-scores for the three subscales will then be summed for a total score representing general mental health functioning. |
Baseline to 4-month follow-up
|
|
Physical Functioning
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 2-month follow-up
|
Physical functioning will be assessed via the PROMIS-29 V2.0. The scale has 29 items divided across 8 subscales. Five of the subscales are focused on physical functioning: Physical Function, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity. The subscales Physical Function, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Pain Interference each have four items rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much) with higher scores indicating worse physical functioning. The Pain Interference subscale is a single item rated on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Scores for each of the subscales will be summed and converted to T-scores. The T-scores for the five subscales will then be summed for a total score representing physical functioning. |
Baseline to 2-month follow-up
|
|
Physical Functioning (4 months)
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 4-month follow-up
|
Physical functioning will be assessed via the PROMIS-29 V2.0. The scale has 29 items divided across 8 subscales. Five of the subscales are focused on physical functioning: Physical Function, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity. The subscales Physical Function, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Pain Interference each have four items rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much) with higher scores indicating worse physical functioning. The Pain Interference subscale is a single item rated on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Scores for each of the subscales will be summed and converted to T-scores. The T-scores for the five subscales will then be summed for a total score representing physical functioning. |
Baseline to 4-month follow-up
|
|
Alcohol Use
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 2-month follow-up
|
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) 30-day alcohol consumption will be used to assess alcohol use including total number of drinking days, number of drinks per drinking day, and number of heavy episodes of drinking. |
Baseline to 2-month follow-up
|
|
Alcohol Use (4 months)
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 4-month follow-up
|
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) 30-day alcohol consumption will be used to assess alcohol use including total number of drinking days, number of drinks per drinking day, and number of heavy episodes of drinking. |
Baseline to 4-month follow-up
|
|
Suicide Ideation
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 2-month follow-up
|
Suicide Ideation will be assessed via the Depressive Symptom Index Suicidality Scale. The scale has four items rated on a Likert scale from 0 - 3, with higher scores indicating a higher intensity of suicide ideation. |
Baseline to 2-month follow-up
|
|
Suicide Ideation (4 months)
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 4-month follow-up
|
Suicide Ideation will be assessed via the Depressive Symptom Index Suicidality Scale. The scale has four items rated on a Likert scale from 0 - 3, with higher scores indicating a higher intensity of suicide ideation. |
Baseline to 4-month follow-up
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Mitarbeiter
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
- Trauma- und stressbedingte Störungen
- Erkrankungen des Nervensystems
- Psychische Störungen
- Verhaltenssymptome
- Substanzbezogene Störungen
- Chemisch induzierte Störungen
- Selbstverletzendes Verhalten
- Alkoholbedingte Störungen
- Schlaf-Wach-Störungen
- Schlafstörungen, intrinsisch
- Dyssomnien
- Belastungsstörungen, traumatisch
- Verhalten
- Persönliche Zufriedenheit
- Angststörungen
- Selbstmord
- Alkoholismus
- Schlafeinleitungs- und -erhaltungsstörungen
- Kampfstörungen
- Geistiges Wohlergehen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- STUDY00010152
- 1K23MH137406-01A1 (US NIH Stipendium/Vertrag)
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .