Studying the Impacts of Higher Taxes and Bans on Electronic Cigarettes to Improve Public Health
6. Mai 2026 aktualisiert von: Ce Shang, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Design Tiered Tax Rates for Electronic Cigarettes (ECs) Based on Their Appeals to Youth and Young Adults
This clinical trial studies whether imposing higher taxes and bans on electronic cigarettes (EC) with appealing features impacts tobacco use among current and susceptible adolescents and young adults (AYA) EC users and adults who use EC or are open to EC use.
ECs are currently the most popular form of nicotine or tobacco product in the United States.
Compared to burned cigarette products, ECs generally pose fewer short-term harms, making them a promising tool for lowering users' exposure to toxins and cancer-causing chemicals from smoking, promoting better public health outcomes.
However, evidence shows that EC marketing has increased overall initiation into nicotine use among AYAs, and that EC users are at a higher risk of becoming smokers, which could have negative public health outcomes.
Therefore, understanding the public health impact of EC use and regulation remains a major goal in tobacco control research.
This trial studies different scenarios which impose higher taxes or bans on ECs with appealing features.
Researchers hope that by studying participant responses to the different scenarios they may be able to identify which ones best discourage EC use among AYAs while promoting adult EC users to quit smoking, which may improve public health.
Studienübersicht
Status
Noch keine Rekrutierung
Bedingungen
Detaillierte Beschreibung
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Provide empirical evidence on how tiered EC taxes - imposing higher taxes on ECs with AYA appealing features - impact EC use, combustible tobacco use, and the prevalence of cross-border or illegal purchases.
II. Examine how tiered taxes on AYA-appealing features (flavors, product type, nicotine concentration) impact EC use and combustible tobacco smoking among current and susceptible AYA EC users. (Aim 1) III. Assess how tiered taxes on AYA-appealing features impact EC and combustible tobacco smoking among adult smokers who either use or are open to using ECs. (Aim 2) IV. Compare tiered EC taxes with sales bans on ECs with AYA-appealing features in terms of their impacts on tobacco use, cross-border shopping, and illegal EC purchases. (Aim 3)
OUTLINE: Participants are assigned to 1 of 3 aims.
AIMS 1 & 2: Participants complete volumetric choice experiments (VCEs) over 20 minutes on study with random assignment to: 1) Nicotine levels (low versus [vs.] high); 2) Flavors (fruit/sweet vs. ice vs. menthol/mint vs. tobacco); 3) EC tax bases (by product type vs. by flavor vs. by nicotine concentration), and 4) rate levels (status quo [equal rates] vs. 50% higher vs. 100% higher vs. 200% higher) among six different products (tanks, pods, disposables, cigarettes, cigars, and oral nicotine pouches [ONPs]) and opt-out options (none of the six products or quitting).
AIM 3: Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 groups.
GROUP 1: Participants complete VCEs over 20 minutes on study with random assignment to: 1) nicotine levels (low versus vs. high) and 2) flavors (fruit/sweet vs. ice vs. menthol/mint vs. tobacco) with optimal tiered tax conditions among four different products (preferred EC type, cigarettes, cigars, ONPs) and opt-out options (none of the six products or quitting).
GROUP 2: Participants complete VCEs over 20 minutes on study with random assignment to: 1) nicotine levels (low versus vs. high), 2) flavors (fruit/sweet vs. ice vs. menthol/mint vs. tobacco), and 3) purchasing sources (out-of-state legal vs. local/online illegal, vs. local legal) with banned conditions among four different products (preferred EC type, cigarettes, cigars, ONPs) and opt-out options (none of the six products or quitting).
Studientyp
Interventionell
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
3400
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.
Studienkontakt
- Name: The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
- Telefonnummer: 800-293-5066
- E-Mail: OSUCCCClinicaltrials@osumc.edu
Studienorte
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, Vereinigte Staaten, 43210
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
-
Kontakt:
- Ce Shang, PhD
- Telefonnummer: 614-685-3741
- E-Mail: ce.shang@osumc.edu
-
Hauptermittler:
- Ce Shang, PhD
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Kind
- Erwachsene
- Älterer Erwachsener
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Ja
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- AYAs aged 15-24 who are daily or nondaily users of ECs and are not smoking in the past 30 days
- AYA tobacco nonusers aged 15-24 who are susceptible to EC or tobacco use (i.e., curiosity about the product, intention to try it in the near future, and likely response if a best friend were to offer them the product)
- Adults aged 18+ who are daily or nondaily users of ECs and combustible tobacco in the past 30 days
- Adults aged 18+ who are daily or nondaily users of combustible tobacco in the past 30 days, not currently using ECs but are open to trying ECs
Studienplan
Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Verhütung
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Sequenzielle Zuweisung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Aim 3 group 1 (tiered tax condition VCEs)
Participants complete VCEs over 20 minutes on study with random assignment to: 1) nicotine levels (low versus vs. high) and 2) flavors (fruit/sweet vs. ice vs. menthol/mint vs. tobacco) with optimal tiered tax conditions among four different products (preferred EC type, cigarettes, cigars, ONPs) and opt-out options (none of the six products or quitting).
|
Nebenstudien
Complete EC tax base, rate, nicotine level, and flavor VCEs
Andere Namen:
Complete tiered tax condition VCEs
Andere Namen:
Complete banned condition VCEs
Andere Namen:
|
|
Experimental: Aim 3 group 2 (banned condition VCEs)
Participants complete VCEs over 20 minutes on study with random assignment to: 1) nicotine levels (low versus vs. high), 2) flavors (fruit/sweet vs. ice vs. menthol/mint vs. tobacco), and 3) purchasing sources (out-of-state legal vs. local/online illegal, vs. local legal) with banned conditions among four different products (preferred EC type, cigarettes, cigars, ONPs) and opt-out options (none of the six products or quitting).
|
Nebenstudien
Complete EC tax base, rate, nicotine level, and flavor VCEs
Andere Namen:
Complete tiered tax condition VCEs
Andere Namen:
Complete banned condition VCEs
Andere Namen:
|
|
Experimental: Aims 1 & 2 (EC tax base and rate VCEs)
Participants complete VCEs over 20 minutes on study with random assignment to: 1) Nicotine levels (low vs. high); 2) Flavors (fruit/sweet vs. ice vs. menthol/mint vs. tobacco); 3) EC tax bases (by product type vs. by flavor vs. by nicotine concentration), and 4) rate levels (status quo [equal rates] vs. 50% higher vs. 100% higher vs. 200% higher) among six different products (tanks, pods, disposables, cigarettes, cigars, and oral nicotine pouches [ONPs]) and opt-out options (none of the six products or quitting).
|
Nebenstudien
Complete EC tax base, rate, nicotine level, and flavor VCEs
Andere Namen:
Complete tiered tax condition VCEs
Andere Namen:
Complete banned condition VCEs
Andere Namen:
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Electronic cigarette (EC) use among adolescent and young adult (AYA) current/susceptible users (Aim 1)
Zeitfenster: Up to 2 years
|
Will examine how tiered taxes on AYA-appealing features (flavors, product type, nicotine concentration) impact EC use among current and susceptible AYA EC users.
All hypotheses will be tested using regression analyses.
Will use count data models, such as the Negative Binomial model, the Poisson model, and Multiple Discrete-Continuous Extreme Value (MDCEV) Model.
Will use clustered sandwich estimators and consider mixed effects, random effects, and fixed effects in the modeling to account for the hierarchical structure (participant-choice set-purchase) and correlations among choices made by the same individual (repeated measures).
Analyses will also control for sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, education, tobacco use histories/status, and purchase expenditures.
|
Up to 2 years
|
|
Combustible tobacco smoking among AYA current/susceptible users (Aim 1)
Zeitfenster: Up to 2 years
|
Will examine how tiered taxes on AYA-appealing features (flavors, product type, nicotine concentration) impact combustible tobacco smoking among current and susceptible AYA EC users.
All hypotheses will be tested using regression analyses.
Will use count data models, such as the Negative Binomial model, the Poisson model, and MDCEV Model.
Will use clustered sandwich estimators and consider mixed effects, random effects, and fixed effects in the modeling to account for the hierarchical structure (participant-choice set-purchase) and correlations among choices made by the same individual (repeated measures).
Analyses will also control for sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, education, tobacco use histories/status, and purchase expenditures.
|
Up to 2 years
|
|
EC use among adult smokers who use or are open to ECs (Aim 2)
Zeitfenster: Up to 2 years
|
Will assess how tiered taxes on AYA-appealing features (flavors, product type, nicotine concentration) impact EC smoking among adult smokers who either use or are open to using ECs.
All hypotheses will be tested using regression analyses.
Will use count data models, such as the Negative Binomial model, the Poisson model, and MDCEV Model.
Will use clustered sandwich estimators and consider mixed effects, random effects, and fixed effects in the modeling to account for the hierarchical structure (participant-choice set-purchase) and correlations among choices made by the same individual (repeated measures).
Analyses will also control for sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, education, tobacco use histories/status, and purchase expenditures.
|
Up to 2 years
|
|
Combustible tobacco smoking among adult smokers who use or are open to ECs (Aim 2)
Zeitfenster: Up to 2 years
|
Will assess how tiered taxes on AYA-appealing features (flavors, product type, nicotine concentration) impact combustible tobacco smoking among adult smokers who either use or are open to using ECs.
All hypotheses will be tested using regression analyses.
Will use count data models, such as the Negative Binomial model, the Poisson model, and MDCEV Model.
Will use clustered sandwich estimators and consider mixed effects, random effects, and fixed effects in the modeling to account for the hierarchical structure (participant-choice set-purchase) and correlations among choices made by the same individual (repeated measures).
Analyses will also control for sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, education, tobacco use histories/status, and purchase expenditures.
|
Up to 2 years
|
|
Tobacco use among AYA EC current/susceptible users (Aim 3)
Zeitfenster: Up to 2 years
|
Will compare tiered EC taxes with sales bans on ECs with AYA-appealing features in terms of their impacts on tobacco use.
All hypotheses will be tested using regression analyses.
Will use count data models, such as the Negative Binomial model, the Poisson model, and MDCEV Model.
Will use clustered sandwich estimators and consider mixed effects, random effects, and fixed effects in the modeling to account for the hierarchical structure (participant-choice set-purchase) and correlations among choices made by the same individual (repeated measures).
Analyses will also control for sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, education, tobacco use histories/status, and purchase expenditures.
|
Up to 2 years
|
|
Cross-border shopping among AYA EC current/susceptible users (Aim 3)
Zeitfenster: Up to 2 years
|
Will compare tiered EC taxes with sales bans on ECs with AYA-appealing features in terms of their impacts on cross-border shopping.
In order to assess differences in the proportion of cross-border EC purchases between the two randomization groups, the occurrence of a cross-border EC purchase will be modeled as a binary variable.
All hypotheses will be tested using regression analyses.
Will use count data models, such as the Negative Binomial model, the Poisson model, and MDCEV Model.
Will use clustered sandwich estimators and consider mixed effects, random effects, and fixed effects in the modeling to account for the hierarchical structure (participant-choice set-purchase) and correlations among choices made by the same individual (repeated measures).
Analyses will also control for sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, education, tobacco use histories/status, and purchase expenditures.
|
Up to 2 years
|
|
Illegal EC purchases among AYA EC current/susceptible users (Aim 3)
Zeitfenster: Up to 2 years
|
Will compare tiered EC taxes with sales bans on ECs with AYA-appealing features in terms of their impacts on illegal EC purchases.
In order to assess differences in the proportion of illegal EC purchases between the two randomization groups, the occurrence of an illegal EC purchase will be modeled as a binary variable.
All hypotheses will be tested using regression analyses.
Will use count data models, such as the Negative Binomial model, the Poisson model, and MDCEV Model.
Will use clustered sandwich estimators and consider mixed effects, random effects, and fixed effects in the modeling to account for the hierarchical structure (participant-choice set-purchase) and correlations among choices made by the same individual (repeated measures).
Analyses will also control for sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, education, tobacco use histories/status, and purchase expenditures.
|
Up to 2 years
|
|
Tobacco use among adult smokers who use or are open to ECs (Aim 3)
Zeitfenster: Up to 3 years
|
Will compare tiered EC taxes with sales bans on ECs with AYA-appealing features in terms of their impacts on tobacco use.
All hypotheses will be tested using regression analyses.
Will use count data models, such as the Negative Binomial model, the Poisson model, and MDCEV Model.
Will use clustered sandwich estimators and consider mixed effects, random effects, and fixed effects in the modeling to account for the hierarchical structure (participant-choice set-purchase) and correlations among choices made by the same individual (repeated measures).
Analyses will also control for sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, education, tobacco use histories/status, and purchase expenditures.
|
Up to 3 years
|
|
Cross-border shopping among adult smokers who use or are open to ECs (Aim 3)
Zeitfenster: Up to 2 years
|
Will compare tiered EC taxes with sales bans on ECs with AYA-appealing features in terms of their impacts on cross-border shopping.
In order to assess differences in the proportion of cross-border EC purchases between the two randomization groups, the occurrence of a cross-border EC purchase will be modeled as a binary variable.
All hypotheses will be tested using regression analyses.
Will use count data models, such as the Negative Binomial model, the Poisson model, and MDCEV Model.
Will use clustered sandwich estimators and consider mixed effects, random effects, and fixed effects in the modeling to account for the hierarchical structure (participant-choice set-purchase) and correlations among choices made by the same individual (repeated measures).
Analyses will also control for sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, education, tobacco use histories/status, and purchase expenditures.
|
Up to 2 years
|
|
Illegal EC purchases among adult smokers who use or are open to ECs (Aim 3)
Zeitfenster: Up to 3 years
|
Will compare tiered EC taxes with sales bans on ECs with AYA-appealing features in terms of their impacts on illegal EC purchases.
In order to assess differences in the proportion of illegal EC purchases between the two randomization groups, the occurrence of an illegal EC purchase will be modeled as a binary variable.
All hypotheses will be tested using regression analyses.
Will use count data models, such as the Negative Binomial model, the Poisson model, and MDCEV Model.
Will use clustered sandwich estimators and consider mixed effects, random effects, and fixed effects in the modeling to account for the hierarchical structure (participant-choice set-purchase) and correlations among choices made by the same individual (repeated measures).
Analyses will also control for sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, education, tobacco use histories/status, and purchase expenditures.
|
Up to 3 years
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.
Ermittler
- Hauptermittler: Ce Shang, PhD, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.
Nützliche Links
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)
1. August 2026
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
31. Dezember 2027
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
31. Dezember 2027
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
6. Mai 2026
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
6. Mai 2026
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
12. Mai 2026
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
12. Mai 2026
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
6. Mai 2026
Zuletzt verifiziert
1. April 2026
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- OSU-25157
- NCI-2026-02421 (Registrierungskennung: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Nein
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Nein
Produkt, das in den USA hergestellt und aus den USA exportiert wird
Nein
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .