Studying the Impacts of Higher Taxes and Bans on Electronic Cigarettes to Improve Public Health
6 de mayo de 2026 actualizado por: Ce Shang, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Design Tiered Tax Rates for Electronic Cigarettes (ECs) Based on Their Appeals to Youth and Young Adults
This clinical trial studies whether imposing higher taxes and bans on electronic cigarettes (EC) with appealing features impacts tobacco use among current and susceptible adolescents and young adults (AYA) EC users and adults who use EC or are open to EC use.
ECs are currently the most popular form of nicotine or tobacco product in the United States.
Compared to burned cigarette products, ECs generally pose fewer short-term harms, making them a promising tool for lowering users' exposure to toxins and cancer-causing chemicals from smoking, promoting better public health outcomes.
However, evidence shows that EC marketing has increased overall initiation into nicotine use among AYAs, and that EC users are at a higher risk of becoming smokers, which could have negative public health outcomes.
Therefore, understanding the public health impact of EC use and regulation remains a major goal in tobacco control research.
This trial studies different scenarios which impose higher taxes or bans on ECs with appealing features.
Researchers hope that by studying participant responses to the different scenarios they may be able to identify which ones best discourage EC use among AYAs while promoting adult EC users to quit smoking, which may improve public health.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Aún no reclutando
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Provide empirical evidence on how tiered EC taxes - imposing higher taxes on ECs with AYA appealing features - impact EC use, combustible tobacco use, and the prevalence of cross-border or illegal purchases.
II. Examine how tiered taxes on AYA-appealing features (flavors, product type, nicotine concentration) impact EC use and combustible tobacco smoking among current and susceptible AYA EC users. (Aim 1) III. Assess how tiered taxes on AYA-appealing features impact EC and combustible tobacco smoking among adult smokers who either use or are open to using ECs. (Aim 2) IV. Compare tiered EC taxes with sales bans on ECs with AYA-appealing features in terms of their impacts on tobacco use, cross-border shopping, and illegal EC purchases. (Aim 3)
OUTLINE: Participants are assigned to 1 of 3 aims.
AIMS 1 & 2: Participants complete volumetric choice experiments (VCEs) over 20 minutes on study with random assignment to: 1) Nicotine levels (low versus [vs.] high); 2) Flavors (fruit/sweet vs. ice vs. menthol/mint vs. tobacco); 3) EC tax bases (by product type vs. by flavor vs. by nicotine concentration), and 4) rate levels (status quo [equal rates] vs. 50% higher vs. 100% higher vs. 200% higher) among six different products (tanks, pods, disposables, cigarettes, cigars, and oral nicotine pouches [ONPs]) and opt-out options (none of the six products or quitting).
AIM 3: Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 groups.
GROUP 1: Participants complete VCEs over 20 minutes on study with random assignment to: 1) nicotine levels (low versus vs. high) and 2) flavors (fruit/sweet vs. ice vs. menthol/mint vs. tobacco) with optimal tiered tax conditions among four different products (preferred EC type, cigarettes, cigars, ONPs) and opt-out options (none of the six products or quitting).
GROUP 2: Participants complete VCEs over 20 minutes on study with random assignment to: 1) nicotine levels (low versus vs. high), 2) flavors (fruit/sweet vs. ice vs. menthol/mint vs. tobacco), and 3) purchasing sources (out-of-state legal vs. local/online illegal, vs. local legal) with banned conditions among four different products (preferred EC type, cigarettes, cigars, ONPs) and opt-out options (none of the six products or quitting).
Tipo de estudio
Intervencionista
Inscripción (Estimado)
3400
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.
Estudio Contacto
- Nombre: The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
- Número de teléfono: 800-293-5066
- Correo electrónico: OSUCCCClinicaltrials@osumc.edu
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, Estados Unidos, 43210
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
-
Contacto:
- Ce Shang, PhD
- Número de teléfono: 614-685-3741
- Correo electrónico: ce.shang@osumc.edu
-
Investigador principal:
- Ce Shang, PhD
-
-
Criterios de participación
Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Niño
- Adulto
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Sí
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- AYAs aged 15-24 who are daily or nondaily users of ECs and are not smoking in the past 30 days
- AYA tobacco nonusers aged 15-24 who are susceptible to EC or tobacco use (i.e., curiosity about the product, intention to try it in the near future, and likely response if a best friend were to offer them the product)
- Adults aged 18+ who are daily or nondaily users of ECs and combustible tobacco in the past 30 days
- Adults aged 18+ who are daily or nondaily users of combustible tobacco in the past 30 days, not currently using ECs but are open to trying ECs
Plan de estudios
Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Prevención
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación Secuencial
- Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Aim 3 group 1 (tiered tax condition VCEs)
Participants complete VCEs over 20 minutes on study with random assignment to: 1) nicotine levels (low versus vs. high) and 2) flavors (fruit/sweet vs. ice vs. menthol/mint vs. tobacco) with optimal tiered tax conditions among four different products (preferred EC type, cigarettes, cigars, ONPs) and opt-out options (none of the six products or quitting).
|
Estudios complementarios
Complete EC tax base, rate, nicotine level, and flavor VCEs
Otros nombres:
Complete tiered tax condition VCEs
Otros nombres:
Complete banned condition VCEs
Otros nombres:
|
|
Experimental: Aim 3 group 2 (banned condition VCEs)
Participants complete VCEs over 20 minutes on study with random assignment to: 1) nicotine levels (low versus vs. high), 2) flavors (fruit/sweet vs. ice vs. menthol/mint vs. tobacco), and 3) purchasing sources (out-of-state legal vs. local/online illegal, vs. local legal) with banned conditions among four different products (preferred EC type, cigarettes, cigars, ONPs) and opt-out options (none of the six products or quitting).
|
Estudios complementarios
Complete EC tax base, rate, nicotine level, and flavor VCEs
Otros nombres:
Complete tiered tax condition VCEs
Otros nombres:
Complete banned condition VCEs
Otros nombres:
|
|
Experimental: Aims 1 & 2 (EC tax base and rate VCEs)
Participants complete VCEs over 20 minutes on study with random assignment to: 1) Nicotine levels (low vs. high); 2) Flavors (fruit/sweet vs. ice vs. menthol/mint vs. tobacco); 3) EC tax bases (by product type vs. by flavor vs. by nicotine concentration), and 4) rate levels (status quo [equal rates] vs. 50% higher vs. 100% higher vs. 200% higher) among six different products (tanks, pods, disposables, cigarettes, cigars, and oral nicotine pouches [ONPs]) and opt-out options (none of the six products or quitting).
|
Estudios complementarios
Complete EC tax base, rate, nicotine level, and flavor VCEs
Otros nombres:
Complete tiered tax condition VCEs
Otros nombres:
Complete banned condition VCEs
Otros nombres:
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Electronic cigarette (EC) use among adolescent and young adult (AYA) current/susceptible users (Aim 1)
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 2 years
|
Will examine how tiered taxes on AYA-appealing features (flavors, product type, nicotine concentration) impact EC use among current and susceptible AYA EC users.
All hypotheses will be tested using regression analyses.
Will use count data models, such as the Negative Binomial model, the Poisson model, and Multiple Discrete-Continuous Extreme Value (MDCEV) Model.
Will use clustered sandwich estimators and consider mixed effects, random effects, and fixed effects in the modeling to account for the hierarchical structure (participant-choice set-purchase) and correlations among choices made by the same individual (repeated measures).
Analyses will also control for sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, education, tobacco use histories/status, and purchase expenditures.
|
Up to 2 years
|
|
Combustible tobacco smoking among AYA current/susceptible users (Aim 1)
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 2 years
|
Will examine how tiered taxes on AYA-appealing features (flavors, product type, nicotine concentration) impact combustible tobacco smoking among current and susceptible AYA EC users.
All hypotheses will be tested using regression analyses.
Will use count data models, such as the Negative Binomial model, the Poisson model, and MDCEV Model.
Will use clustered sandwich estimators and consider mixed effects, random effects, and fixed effects in the modeling to account for the hierarchical structure (participant-choice set-purchase) and correlations among choices made by the same individual (repeated measures).
Analyses will also control for sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, education, tobacco use histories/status, and purchase expenditures.
|
Up to 2 years
|
|
EC use among adult smokers who use or are open to ECs (Aim 2)
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 2 years
|
Will assess how tiered taxes on AYA-appealing features (flavors, product type, nicotine concentration) impact EC smoking among adult smokers who either use or are open to using ECs.
All hypotheses will be tested using regression analyses.
Will use count data models, such as the Negative Binomial model, the Poisson model, and MDCEV Model.
Will use clustered sandwich estimators and consider mixed effects, random effects, and fixed effects in the modeling to account for the hierarchical structure (participant-choice set-purchase) and correlations among choices made by the same individual (repeated measures).
Analyses will also control for sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, education, tobacco use histories/status, and purchase expenditures.
|
Up to 2 years
|
|
Combustible tobacco smoking among adult smokers who use or are open to ECs (Aim 2)
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 2 years
|
Will assess how tiered taxes on AYA-appealing features (flavors, product type, nicotine concentration) impact combustible tobacco smoking among adult smokers who either use or are open to using ECs.
All hypotheses will be tested using regression analyses.
Will use count data models, such as the Negative Binomial model, the Poisson model, and MDCEV Model.
Will use clustered sandwich estimators and consider mixed effects, random effects, and fixed effects in the modeling to account for the hierarchical structure (participant-choice set-purchase) and correlations among choices made by the same individual (repeated measures).
Analyses will also control for sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, education, tobacco use histories/status, and purchase expenditures.
|
Up to 2 years
|
|
Tobacco use among AYA EC current/susceptible users (Aim 3)
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 2 years
|
Will compare tiered EC taxes with sales bans on ECs with AYA-appealing features in terms of their impacts on tobacco use.
All hypotheses will be tested using regression analyses.
Will use count data models, such as the Negative Binomial model, the Poisson model, and MDCEV Model.
Will use clustered sandwich estimators and consider mixed effects, random effects, and fixed effects in the modeling to account for the hierarchical structure (participant-choice set-purchase) and correlations among choices made by the same individual (repeated measures).
Analyses will also control for sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, education, tobacco use histories/status, and purchase expenditures.
|
Up to 2 years
|
|
Cross-border shopping among AYA EC current/susceptible users (Aim 3)
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 2 years
|
Will compare tiered EC taxes with sales bans on ECs with AYA-appealing features in terms of their impacts on cross-border shopping.
In order to assess differences in the proportion of cross-border EC purchases between the two randomization groups, the occurrence of a cross-border EC purchase will be modeled as a binary variable.
All hypotheses will be tested using regression analyses.
Will use count data models, such as the Negative Binomial model, the Poisson model, and MDCEV Model.
Will use clustered sandwich estimators and consider mixed effects, random effects, and fixed effects in the modeling to account for the hierarchical structure (participant-choice set-purchase) and correlations among choices made by the same individual (repeated measures).
Analyses will also control for sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, education, tobacco use histories/status, and purchase expenditures.
|
Up to 2 years
|
|
Illegal EC purchases among AYA EC current/susceptible users (Aim 3)
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 2 years
|
Will compare tiered EC taxes with sales bans on ECs with AYA-appealing features in terms of their impacts on illegal EC purchases.
In order to assess differences in the proportion of illegal EC purchases between the two randomization groups, the occurrence of an illegal EC purchase will be modeled as a binary variable.
All hypotheses will be tested using regression analyses.
Will use count data models, such as the Negative Binomial model, the Poisson model, and MDCEV Model.
Will use clustered sandwich estimators and consider mixed effects, random effects, and fixed effects in the modeling to account for the hierarchical structure (participant-choice set-purchase) and correlations among choices made by the same individual (repeated measures).
Analyses will also control for sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, education, tobacco use histories/status, and purchase expenditures.
|
Up to 2 years
|
|
Tobacco use among adult smokers who use or are open to ECs (Aim 3)
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 3 years
|
Will compare tiered EC taxes with sales bans on ECs with AYA-appealing features in terms of their impacts on tobacco use.
All hypotheses will be tested using regression analyses.
Will use count data models, such as the Negative Binomial model, the Poisson model, and MDCEV Model.
Will use clustered sandwich estimators and consider mixed effects, random effects, and fixed effects in the modeling to account for the hierarchical structure (participant-choice set-purchase) and correlations among choices made by the same individual (repeated measures).
Analyses will also control for sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, education, tobacco use histories/status, and purchase expenditures.
|
Up to 3 years
|
|
Cross-border shopping among adult smokers who use or are open to ECs (Aim 3)
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 2 years
|
Will compare tiered EC taxes with sales bans on ECs with AYA-appealing features in terms of their impacts on cross-border shopping.
In order to assess differences in the proportion of cross-border EC purchases between the two randomization groups, the occurrence of a cross-border EC purchase will be modeled as a binary variable.
All hypotheses will be tested using regression analyses.
Will use count data models, such as the Negative Binomial model, the Poisson model, and MDCEV Model.
Will use clustered sandwich estimators and consider mixed effects, random effects, and fixed effects in the modeling to account for the hierarchical structure (participant-choice set-purchase) and correlations among choices made by the same individual (repeated measures).
Analyses will also control for sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, education, tobacco use histories/status, and purchase expenditures.
|
Up to 2 years
|
|
Illegal EC purchases among adult smokers who use or are open to ECs (Aim 3)
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 3 years
|
Will compare tiered EC taxes with sales bans on ECs with AYA-appealing features in terms of their impacts on illegal EC purchases.
In order to assess differences in the proportion of illegal EC purchases between the two randomization groups, the occurrence of an illegal EC purchase will be modeled as a binary variable.
All hypotheses will be tested using regression analyses.
Will use count data models, such as the Negative Binomial model, the Poisson model, and MDCEV Model.
Will use clustered sandwich estimators and consider mixed effects, random effects, and fixed effects in the modeling to account for the hierarchical structure (participant-choice set-purchase) and correlations among choices made by the same individual (repeated measures).
Analyses will also control for sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, education, tobacco use histories/status, and purchase expenditures.
|
Up to 3 years
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Ce Shang, PhD, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.
Enlaces Útiles
Fechas de registro del estudio
Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Estimado)
1 de agosto de 2026
Finalización primaria (Estimado)
31 de diciembre de 2027
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
31 de diciembre de 2027
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
6 de mayo de 2026
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
6 de mayo de 2026
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
12 de mayo de 2026
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
12 de mayo de 2026
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
6 de mayo de 2026
Última verificación
1 de abril de 2026
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- OSU-25157
- NCI-2026-02421 (Identificador de registro: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.
No
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .