Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Regular Growth Monitoring (RGM) of Young Children in Guinea-Bissau

13. Juli 2026 aktualisiert von: Susan B. Roberts, Trustees of Dartmouth College

Pilot Study to Assess the Benefits and Sustainability of Regular Growth Monitoring (RGM) of Young Children in Villages in Guinea-Bissau

Wasting (severe thinness) is a common and serious problem among young children in rural Guinea-Bissau. Community Health Agents (CHAs) can help prevent malnutrition by regularly measuring children's growth and advising families on nutritious local foods. However, this practice is not consistently implemented.

This pilot study will test whether implementing Regular Growth Monitoring (RGM) by CHAs every month is feasible and effective in reducing malnutrition among children aged 6 months to 5 years in two rural villages. Investigators will also compare three methods for measuring mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), which is used to detect malnutrition: the standard WHO tape measure, a photograph of the arm, and a simple bracelet. The goal is to identify which method is easiest for CHAs to use reliably.

Baseline and final measurements will be taken in both villages. One village will receive the monthly RGM intervention first, followed by the second village. Families will also be asked about their experiences with the program through brief questionnaires.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Wasting is prevalent in rural Guinea-Bissau villages and adversely affects child health and cognitive development long-term. Prior work by this team of investigators suggests that regular feedback from Community Health Agents (CHAs) to caregivers, including recommendations of locally available nutritious recipes for at-risk children, may reduce the incidence of moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) and severe acute malnutrition (SAM). However, routine growth monitoring (RGM) has been largely unfeasible at the village level due to measurement complexity and limited training resources. Modern technology and artificial intelligence may help make this more scalable.

This is a proof-of-concept, sequential pilot study conducted in two villages in Guinea-Bissau with which the team has an established relationship. Baseline anthropometric measurements will be collected on all eligible children (aged 6 months to 5 years, without SAM at enrollment) in both villages. Children identified with SAM at baseline will be referred to the local malnutrition clinic and excluded from the study.

One village will begin the RGM intervention immediately after baseline data collection. The second village will begin the intervention after final data collection in the first village. Assignment order will be by PI decision rather than randomization, as required by the collaborating UCSF team members.

During the RGM period, CHAs will screen each child monthly using all three mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) methods: (1) WHO tape measure (reference standard), (2) arm photograph, and (3) bracelet. Data will be entered into a secure REDCap database. Children meeting SAM criteria (by tape measure) will be referred to tertiary care; children with MAM will receive weekly CHA nutrition education on local recipes. Measurements collected at baseline and end-of-study include: weight, height, MUAC by all three methods, skinfold thicknesses (biceps and triceps), and family demographics.

After study completion, brief questionnaires will be administered to parents, CHAs, and Ministry of Health staff to assess perceived effects, acceptability, feasibility, and preferences among the monitoring methods. This study has been approved by both the Dartmouth College CPHS and the Ministry of Health in Guinea-Bissau.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

400

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Bissau Region
      • Bissau, Bissau Region, Guinea-Bissau, 1000
        • Two villages in rural Guinea-Bissau

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Kind

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children aged 6 months to 5 years residing in one of the two selected villages in Guinea-Bissau
  • Caregiver willing to enroll the child in the study (verbal consent provided)
  • Caregiver can provide birth certificate or documentation of child's age
  • Child does not have severe acute malnutrition (SAM) at the baseline assessment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children diagnosed with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) at baseline (these children will be referred to the local malnutrition clinic)
  • Children whose caregivers do not wish to participate

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Verhütung
  • Zuteilung: Nicht randomisiert
  • Interventionsmodell: Sequenzielle Zuweisung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Village #1 (initial start)
Children aged 6 months to 5 years in the first village who do not have SAM at baseline. This village receives the monthly Regular Growth Monitoring (RGM) intervention immediately after baseline data collection. CHAs perform monthly MUAC screening using three methods; at-risk children are referred or receive caregiver nutrition education.
Monthly malnutrition screening by Community Health Agents (CHAs) using three MUAC methods: (1) WHO standard tape measure, (2) arm photograph for remote review, and (3) a solid bracelet device. The tape measure is the reference standard. Children identified with SAM are referred to a tertiary malnutrition clinic; children with MAM have their caregivers provided with weekly education on using local nutritious recipes to support recovery. Data are entered into REDCap and reviewed remotely by the US research team.
Aktiver Komparator: Village #2 (delayed start)
Children aged 6 months to 5 years in the second village who do not have SAM at baseline. This village serves as a comparison group during the first village's RGM period, then receives the same RGM intervention subsequently.
Monthly malnutrition screening by Community Health Agents (CHAs) using three MUAC methods: (1) WHO standard tape measure, (2) arm photograph for remote review, and (3) a solid bracelet device. The tape measure is the reference standard. Children identified with SAM are referred to a tertiary malnutrition clinic; children with MAM have their caregivers provided with weekly education on using local nutritious recipes to support recovery. Data are entered into REDCap and reviewed remotely by the US research team.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Prevalence of severe acute malnutrition (SAM)
Zeitfenster: Baseline to study completion (~4 months)
Proportion of enrolled children meeting SAM criteria (by WHO tape measure MUAC) at study completion, compared between early-start and delayed-start villages.
Baseline to study completion (~4 months)

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Prevalence of moderate acute malnutrition (MAM)
Zeitfenster: Baseline to study completion (~4 months)
Proportion of enrolled children meeting MAM criteria (by WHO tape measure MUAC) at study completion, compared between early-start and delayed-start villages.
Baseline to study completion (~4 months)
Weight-for-length z-score
Zeitfenster: Baseline to study completion (~4 months)
Change in weight-for-length z-score between baseline and final assessment, compared between early-start and delayed-start villages
Baseline to study completion (~4 months)
Weight-for-age z-score
Zeitfenster: Baseline to study completion (~4 months)
Change in weight-for-age z-score between baseline and final assessment, compared between early-start and delayed-start villages.
Baseline to study completion (~4 months)
Length-for-age z-score
Zeitfenster: Baseline and study completion (~4 months)
Change in length-for-age z-score between baseline and final assessment, compared between early-start and delayed-start villages
Baseline and study completion (~4 months)

Andere Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Agreement of new RGM methods vs. reference standard
Zeitfenster: Assessed at each study visit (monthly from baseline to 4 months follow-up)
Accuracy of the arm photograph and bracelet for detecting MAM and SAM relative to the WHO tape measure MUAC.
Assessed at each study visit (monthly from baseline to 4 months follow-up)
Acceptability and feasibility of RGM methods
Zeitfenster: N/A, data collected at study completion (4 month visit)
Perceived acceptability and feasibility of the three MUAC monitoring methods among parents, CHAs, and Ministry of Health staff, collected via brief structured questionnaires.
N/A, data collected at study completion (4 month visit)

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Susan B. Roberts, Ph.D., Dartmouth College

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

5. Mai 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Dezember 2026

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Dezember 2026

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

30. April 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

7. Mai 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

13. Mai 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

15. Juli 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

13. Juli 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. April 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

JA

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Deidentified participant data will be stored and made publicly available at an appropriate repository following publication of the primary manuscript. Participant names stored locally in Guinea-Bissau will be retained for 3 years after study completion and then destroyed. The US team will not have access to identifiable participant information.

IPD-Sharing-Zeitrahmen

Following publication of the primary manuscript.

IPD-Sharing-Zugriffskriterien

Publicly available deidentified dataset; access details to be determined at time of publication.

Art der unterstützenden IPD-Freigabeinformationen

  • STUDIENPROTOKOLL
  • SAFT

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren