Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Regular Growth Monitoring (RGM) of Young Children in Guinea-Bissau

13 de julho de 2026 atualizado por: Susan B. Roberts, Trustees of Dartmouth College

Pilot Study to Assess the Benefits and Sustainability of Regular Growth Monitoring (RGM) of Young Children in Villages in Guinea-Bissau

Wasting (severe thinness) is a common and serious problem among young children in rural Guinea-Bissau. Community Health Agents (CHAs) can help prevent malnutrition by regularly measuring children's growth and advising families on nutritious local foods. However, this practice is not consistently implemented.

This pilot study will test whether implementing Regular Growth Monitoring (RGM) by CHAs every month is feasible and effective in reducing malnutrition among children aged 6 months to 5 years in two rural villages. Investigators will also compare three methods for measuring mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), which is used to detect malnutrition: the standard WHO tape measure, a photograph of the arm, and a simple bracelet. The goal is to identify which method is easiest for CHAs to use reliably.

Baseline and final measurements will be taken in both villages. One village will receive the monthly RGM intervention first, followed by the second village. Families will also be asked about their experiences with the program through brief questionnaires.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

Wasting is prevalent in rural Guinea-Bissau villages and adversely affects child health and cognitive development long-term. Prior work by this team of investigators suggests that regular feedback from Community Health Agents (CHAs) to caregivers, including recommendations of locally available nutritious recipes for at-risk children, may reduce the incidence of moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) and severe acute malnutrition (SAM). However, routine growth monitoring (RGM) has been largely unfeasible at the village level due to measurement complexity and limited training resources. Modern technology and artificial intelligence may help make this more scalable.

This is a proof-of-concept, sequential pilot study conducted in two villages in Guinea-Bissau with which the team has an established relationship. Baseline anthropometric measurements will be collected on all eligible children (aged 6 months to 5 years, without SAM at enrollment) in both villages. Children identified with SAM at baseline will be referred to the local malnutrition clinic and excluded from the study.

One village will begin the RGM intervention immediately after baseline data collection. The second village will begin the intervention after final data collection in the first village. Assignment order will be by PI decision rather than randomization, as required by the collaborating UCSF team members.

During the RGM period, CHAs will screen each child monthly using all three mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) methods: (1) WHO tape measure (reference standard), (2) arm photograph, and (3) bracelet. Data will be entered into a secure REDCap database. Children meeting SAM criteria (by tape measure) will be referred to tertiary care; children with MAM will receive weekly CHA nutrition education on local recipes. Measurements collected at baseline and end-of-study include: weight, height, MUAC by all three methods, skinfold thicknesses (biceps and triceps), and family demographics.

After study completion, brief questionnaires will be administered to parents, CHAs, and Ministry of Health staff to assess perceived effects, acceptability, feasibility, and preferences among the monitoring methods. This study has been approved by both the Dartmouth College CPHS and the Ministry of Health in Guinea-Bissau.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

400

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • Bissau Region
      • Bissau, Bissau Region, Guiné-Bissau, 1000
        • Two villages in rural Guinea-Bissau

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Filho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children aged 6 months to 5 years residing in one of the two selected villages in Guinea-Bissau
  • Caregiver willing to enroll the child in the study (verbal consent provided)
  • Caregiver can provide birth certificate or documentation of child's age
  • Child does not have severe acute malnutrition (SAM) at the baseline assessment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children diagnosed with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) at baseline (these children will be referred to the local malnutrition clinic)
  • Children whose caregivers do not wish to participate

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Prevenção
  • Alocação: Não randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição sequencial
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Village #1 (initial start)
Children aged 6 months to 5 years in the first village who do not have SAM at baseline. This village receives the monthly Regular Growth Monitoring (RGM) intervention immediately after baseline data collection. CHAs perform monthly MUAC screening using three methods; at-risk children are referred or receive caregiver nutrition education.
Monthly malnutrition screening by Community Health Agents (CHAs) using three MUAC methods: (1) WHO standard tape measure, (2) arm photograph for remote review, and (3) a solid bracelet device. The tape measure is the reference standard. Children identified with SAM are referred to a tertiary malnutrition clinic; children with MAM have their caregivers provided with weekly education on using local nutritious recipes to support recovery. Data are entered into REDCap and reviewed remotely by the US research team.
Comparador Ativo: Village #2 (delayed start)
Children aged 6 months to 5 years in the second village who do not have SAM at baseline. This village serves as a comparison group during the first village's RGM period, then receives the same RGM intervention subsequently.
Monthly malnutrition screening by Community Health Agents (CHAs) using three MUAC methods: (1) WHO standard tape measure, (2) arm photograph for remote review, and (3) a solid bracelet device. The tape measure is the reference standard. Children identified with SAM are referred to a tertiary malnutrition clinic; children with MAM have their caregivers provided with weekly education on using local nutritious recipes to support recovery. Data are entered into REDCap and reviewed remotely by the US research team.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Prevalence of severe acute malnutrition (SAM)
Prazo: Baseline to study completion (~4 months)
Proportion of enrolled children meeting SAM criteria (by WHO tape measure MUAC) at study completion, compared between early-start and delayed-start villages.
Baseline to study completion (~4 months)

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Prevalence of moderate acute malnutrition (MAM)
Prazo: Baseline to study completion (~4 months)
Proportion of enrolled children meeting MAM criteria (by WHO tape measure MUAC) at study completion, compared between early-start and delayed-start villages.
Baseline to study completion (~4 months)
Weight-for-length z-score
Prazo: Baseline to study completion (~4 months)
Change in weight-for-length z-score between baseline and final assessment, compared between early-start and delayed-start villages
Baseline to study completion (~4 months)
Weight-for-age z-score
Prazo: Baseline to study completion (~4 months)
Change in weight-for-age z-score between baseline and final assessment, compared between early-start and delayed-start villages.
Baseline to study completion (~4 months)
Length-for-age z-score
Prazo: Baseline and study completion (~4 months)
Change in length-for-age z-score between baseline and final assessment, compared between early-start and delayed-start villages
Baseline and study completion (~4 months)

Outras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Agreement of new RGM methods vs. reference standard
Prazo: Assessed at each study visit (monthly from baseline to 4 months follow-up)
Accuracy of the arm photograph and bracelet for detecting MAM and SAM relative to the WHO tape measure MUAC.
Assessed at each study visit (monthly from baseline to 4 months follow-up)
Acceptability and feasibility of RGM methods
Prazo: N/A, data collected at study completion (4 month visit)
Perceived acceptability and feasibility of the three MUAC monitoring methods among parents, CHAs, and Ministry of Health staff, collected via brief structured questionnaires.
N/A, data collected at study completion (4 month visit)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Susan B. Roberts, Ph.D., Dartmouth College

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

5 de maio de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

1 de dezembro de 2026

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

1 de dezembro de 2026

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

30 de abril de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

7 de maio de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

13 de maio de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

15 de julho de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

13 de julho de 2026

Última verificação

1 de abril de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

SIM

Descrição do plano IPD

Deidentified participant data will be stored and made publicly available at an appropriate repository following publication of the primary manuscript. Participant names stored locally in Guinea-Bissau will be retained for 3 years after study completion and then destroyed. The US team will not have access to identifiable participant information.

Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD

Following publication of the primary manuscript.

Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD

Publicly available deidentified dataset; access details to be determined at time of publication.

Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO
  • SEIVA

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever