- ICH GCP
- US-Register für klinische Studien
- Klinische Studie NCT07605936
Frailty in Older Adults With Prostate Cancer: a Prospective Cohort Study
A Prospective Cohort Study to Assess Frailty, Healthcare Needs and Health Related Quality of Life in Patients With a Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
Prostate cancer is the most common solid tumour cancer amongst men in Ireland, with almost 4,000 new cases diagnosed annually and a median age at diagnosis of 67 years. The incidence of frailty amongst cancer patients is high. Among patients undergoing systemic anti-cancer therapy, frailty increases the risk of treatment related toxicity, hospitalisation, and death and is associated with a poorer quality of life.
This study aims to describe the demographic, clinical and frailty characteristics of men living with prostate cancer in the Mid-West of Ireland. In addition, we will assess the predictive accuracy of three frailty screening tools currently used in Irish clinical practice,G8, CFS and PRISMA 7, for predicting poorer outcomes at baseline, 6 and 12 months.
Studienübersicht
Status
Bedingungen
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Prostate cancer is the most common solid tumour cancer amongst men in Ireland, with almost 4,000 new cases diagnosed annually and a median age at diagnosis of 67 years. Whilst most men present with loco regional disease, 5-10% of men have metastatic disease at diagnosis and others develop metastatic disease later in life.
Frailty, a biologic syndrome of decreased reserve and resistance to stressors, resulting from cumulative declines across multiple physiologic systems, and causing vulnerability to adverse outcomes is also associated with increasing age. Both cancer and systemic anticancer therapies can act as significant stressors to the physiological reserve of patients and as a result, the incidence of frailty amongst older cancer patients is high. Among patients undergoing systemic anti-cancer therapy, frailty increases the risk of treatment related toxicity, hospitalisation, and death and is associated with a poorer quality of life.
The prevalence of frailty amongst men with prostate cancer appears to correlate to the extent of disease with the highest prevalence of frailty present in those with advanced metastatic disease. Treatment paradigms for advanced prostate cancer have evolved substantially, with early treatment intensification now considered the standard of care due to demonstrated overall survival benefits. However, treatment intensification, is associated with increased risk of toxicity and therefore poses a concern given the higher risk of competing mortality and morbidity amongst frail patients.
Functional status in oncology practice is predominantly assessed using the The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Score or Karnofsky performance status which guide treatment decisions and predict treatment toxicity and overall survival .The limitations of these measures in the assessment of a heterogeneous population such as older adults, has been recognised. As such, it is recommended that a frailty assessment is undertaken for older patients and embedded into the decision-making regarding a patient's suitability for systemic anticancer therapy
A variety of frailty identification tools have been utilised in the oncology setting including: Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) , Geriatric 8 screening tool (G8) , Fried Frailty Phenotype and Vulnerable Elders Survey 13 (VES13) , with the G8 and VES being the most frequently used. Lower G8 scores have been associated with poorer oncological outcomes in older cancer patients while VES may demonstrate higher specificity for frailty prediction than G8 (as assessed by GCA). Although recommended and utilised clinically, frailty screening tools have yet to be validated for tailoring final anticancer treatment or frailty intervention plans.
This study aims to describe the demographic, clinical and frailty characteristics of men living with prostate cancer in the Mid-West of Ireland. Participants will be followed longitudinally over 12 months. In addition, we will assess the predictive accuracy of three frailty screening tools currently used in Irish clinical practice,G8, CFS and PRISMA 7, for predicting adverse outcomes at baseline, 6 and 12 months. The findings will provide important real-world insights into frailty, treatment practices, and patient-centred outcomes in prostate cancer, and may help inform future screening strategies and intervention studies
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienkontakt
- Name: Niamh Peters
- Telefonnummer: 0035361482900
- E-Mail: niamh.peters@hse.ie
Studienorte
-
-
Munster
-
Limerick, Munster, Irland, V94 F858
- Rekrutierung
- University Hospital Limerick
-
Kontakt:
- Niamh Peters Dr
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Älterer Erwachsener
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Probenahmeverfahren
Studienpopulation
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- adults aged ≥65 years with a diagnosis of prostate cancer
Exclusion Criteria:
- Neither the patient nor the carer has sufficient proficiency in English sufficiently to complete consent or baseline assessment
- Patients will be excluded if they present outside of research nurse (RN) operational hours( 8am and 5pm Monday - Friday).
- Patients who are acutely unwell and unable to answer the questionnaire will also be excluded.
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Functional status
Zeitfenster: Baseline, six months and twelve months after index visit
|
Patient global functioning as measured through the Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living. The Barthel Index is a 10-item scale used to assess functional independence. The scoring varies across items: bowels, bladder, toilet use, feeding, dressing, and stairs are scored from from 0 (dependence or inability) to 2 (independence) grooming and bathing are scored either 0 (dependent or needs help) or 1 (independent) transfer and mobility are scored 0 (dependent), 1 (major help), 2 (minor help), or 3 (independent). The total score ranges from 0 to 20 and it is obtained by adding up the scores of each item. Lower scores indicated increased disability. In case of rehabilitation, changes of more than two points in the total score reflect a probable genuine change, and change on one item from fully dependent to independent is also likely to be reliable. |
Baseline, six months and twelve months after index visit
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient quality of life
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Six months and twelve months after index visit.
|
Quality of life assessed through the EuroQoL-5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-5L is a standardised instrument developed by the EuroQoL Group (https://euroqol.org/euroqol/) to measure health-related quality of life. It includes a descriptive questionnaire assessing 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) with 5 levels of self-rated severity (1 = no problems, 2 = slight problems, 3 = moderate problems, 4 = severe problems, and 5 = extreme problems). Each dimension is scored separately from 0 to 5 and the patient's "health state" is coded as a 5-digit string. It also includes a vertical visual analogue scale (VAS) to record the patient's self-rated health on a scale from 0 (worst health) to 100 (best health). The score assigned by the patient represents the self-reported level of health. |
Baseline, Six months and twelve months after index visit.
|
|
Incidence of healthcare utilisation
Zeitfenster: six months and 12 months following index visit
|
Percentages of patients who visit a general practitioner (GP), a public health nurse, outpatient departments, private consultations, home help, or allied health services after the ED index visit
|
six months and 12 months following index visit
|
|
Mortality
Zeitfenster: six months and 12 months
|
The rates of patients deceased will be captured at follow-up
|
six months and 12 months
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
- Urogenitale Erkrankungen
- Genitalerkrankungen
- Pathologische Prozesse
- Genitale Neubildungen, männlich
- Urogenitale Neoplasmen
- Neubildungen nach Standort
- Neubildungen
- Genitalerkrankungen, männlich
- Prostataerkrankungen
- Männliche Urogenitalerkrankungen
- Pathologische Zustände, Anzeichen und Symptome
- Gebrechlichkeit
- Prostataneoplasmen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- 020/2024
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .