Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

PULSed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Using a Balloon for Early Intervention - Study (PULSE)

21. August 2026 aktualisiert von: Asklepios proresearch

PULSed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Using a Balloon for Early Intervention - Study - The "PULSE - Study"

This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point, controlled clinical trial to investigate the impact of first line pulsed field ablation during 12 months follow-up in patients with early-stage paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (<3 years) compared to usual care, defined as OMT.

Studienübersicht

Status

Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a progressive arrhythmia associated with significant morbidity and mortality and burden for our health care system. Early rhythm-control therapy was beneficial regarding cardiovascular outcomes in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic AF. Recent studies introducing first line Cryo Balloon based catheter ablation EARLY-AF and STOP -AF provided strong evidence supporting early catheter ablation over pharmacologic rhythm control in the paroxysmal setting of AF. Ongoing studies are challenging the current concept investigating the expansion of early rhythm control also to all types of clinically diagnosed AF using cryo ablation. With the advent of pulsed field ablation (PFA), a third energy source-alongside cryothermal and radiofrequency (RF) ablation-has been established for the effective treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). PFA induces so-called irreversible electroporation, thereby enabling successful ablation of myocardial tissue. Different cell types exhibit varying susceptibility and threshold levels for irreversible electroporation when exposed to PFA. Carefully tailored PFA pulse trains deliver sufficient energy to induce irreversible electroporation while avoiding excessive thermal effects on the surrounding tissue. Consequently, PFA enables selective targeting of myocardial tissue while minimizing collateral injury. This characteristic may translate into improved safety and efficacy in the treatment of AF. In contrast, thermal ablation techniques such as cryoablation and RF ablation inherently rely on substantial temperature changes, either cooling or heating, which may adversely affect adjacent anatomical structures including nerves (e.g., resulting in phrenic nerve palsy), vascular structures, and extracardiac tissues such as the esophagus. The occurrence of these potentially life-threatening complications may be reduced or possibly avoided using PFA. Over recent years, various PFA catheter designs as well as different PFA energy delivery settings have been introduced to enable effective and safe pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). A broad spectrum of catheter configurations-including focal single-tip catheters, pentaspline multielectrode systems, and balloon-based technologies-has been incorporated into clinical practice. Substantial comparative data evaluating PFA against conventional thermal ablation modalities (cryoablation and RF ablation) are now available. To date, no significant differences in acute procedural success rates, procedural parameters, or clinical outcome measures have been consistently observed, although one randomized trial demonstrated a trend toward improved outcomes with PFA. Across these studies, procedure duration was significantly shorter with PFA compared with conventional thermal ablation, representing an additional potential advantage of this treatment modality. More recent studies suggest that catheter ablation-particularly PFA-based ablation-for AF patients without documented recurrence during follow-up may be associated with a reduction in overall ischemic stroke events. These findings indicate that catheter ablation of AF may confer additional benefits in preventing adverse cardiovascular outcomes compared with medical therapy alone. Even in cases of AF recurrence, catheter ablation has been shown not only to significantly reduce AF burden but also to slow the progression from paroxysmal to persistent AF, the latter generally being associated with less favorable clinical outcomes compared with ablation performed during earlier disease stages. Despite the availability of effective antiarrhythmic drug therapy for AF, long-term pharmacological treatment is frequently limited by intolerance, side effects, or insufficient efficacy in a substantial proportion of patients. Nevertheless, large, randomized trials directly comparing PFA-based AF ablation with optimized medical therapy remain scarce.

Therefore, the PULSE study aims to evaluate the impact of PFA using a balloon-based catheter system for the treatment of AF on the maintenance of sinus rhythm compared with optimized medical therapy. In addition, the study will assess AF disease progression in patients with early-stage atrial fibrillation, including both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals with paroxysmal or early persistent AF.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

264

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung

Studienorte

      • Bad Oeynhausen, Deutschland
        • Noch keine Rekrutierung
        • HZD Bad Oeynhausen
        • Kontakt:
          • Philipp Sommer, MD
      • Cologne, Deutschland
        • Noch keine Rekrutierung
        • Uniklinik Köln
        • Kontakt:
          • Daniel Steven, MD
      • Düsseldorf, Deutschland
        • Noch keine Rekrutierung
        • Uniklinik Düsseldorf
        • Kontakt:
          • Obaida Rana, MD
      • Frankfurt, Deutschland
        • Noch keine Rekrutierung
        • CCB Frankfurt
        • Kontakt:
          • Melanie Gunawardene, MD
      • Giessen, Deutschland
        • Noch keine Rekrutierung
        • Uniklinik Gießen
        • Kontakt:
          • Borislav Dinov, MD
      • Hamburg, Deutschland, 20099
      • Herne, Deutschland
        • Noch keine Rekrutierung
        • Marien Hospital Herne
        • Kontakt:
          • Christian Ukena, MD
      • Leipzig, Deutschland
        • Noch keine Rekrutierung
        • Leipzig Herzzentrum HZL
        • Kontakt:
          • Kerstin Bode, MD
      • Neuss, Deutschland
        • Noch keine Rekrutierung
        • Lukas Krankenhaus Neuss
        • Kontakt:
          • Torsten Becker, MD
      • Nuremberg, Deutschland
        • Noch keine Rekrutierung
        • Klinikum Nürnberg
        • Kontakt:
          • Thomas Deneke, MD

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (≥18 years) with symptomatic or asymptomatic, paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation
  • First diagnosis of AF within the last 36 months
  • At least one documented episode of AF on ECG, Holter monitoring, or eligible Smart Watch Device
  • No prior catheter ablation for AF

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Persistent AF >3 years or longstanding persistent AF
  • Previous AF-Ablation
  • Ongoing continuous AAD therapy with Amiodarone at baseline
  • History of failed continuous AAD therapy with > 1 agent. Exceptions are Beta blocker, Verapamil or "pill in the pocket"-therapy
  • Left Atrial Volume Index (LAVI) > 50mL/m2
  • Severe mitral regurgitation
  • Contraindications to anticoagulation therapy
  • Severe pulmonary or renal disease
  • Pregnancy, active cancer disease
  • Any condition or disease which is contraindication for AF ablation within 21 days or Anti-Arrhythmic Drug (AAD)

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Aktiver Komparator: Group1: Pulsed Field-Ablation
Patients randomized in the intervention group should receive the PFA ablation within 21 days.
PFA (Pulse Field Ablation) - Pulmonary vein isolation ablation for atrial fibrillation
Kein Eingriff: Group 2: Usual care
Patients randomized in the control group / usual care group will undergo optimal medical treatment (OMT), defined as antiarrhythmic drug therapy (AAD). Within 21 days patients in the control group should start or maintain on AAD therapy based on decision of the investigator and according to current ESC Guidelines.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Freedom from any Atrial Tachyarrhythmia
Zeitfenster: through 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up
Arrhythmia-free survival, defined as freedom from atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting >30 seconds through 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up on ILR monitoring via blinded core lab or any 12 lead ECG on visits, ECG Holter monitoring, or on symptom driven event monitoring after a 8 week Blanking period (reviewed by a blinded endpoint review committee).
through 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
AF Burden
Zeitfenster: through 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up
Freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) (>30 s) through 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up
through 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up
Burden of Atrial Tachycardia and Atrial Flutter
Zeitfenster: through 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up
Freedom from atrial tachycardia and atrial flutter (AFL) (>30 s) through 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up
through 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up
Re-hospitalization rate
Zeitfenster: up to 12 months follow-up
Re-hospitalization rate due to cardiovascular disease (e.g. AF, worsening of heart failure)
up to 12 months follow-up
AF Progression Timeline
Zeitfenster: through 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up
Progression from paroxysmal to persistent AF trough 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up.
through 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up
Symptom Burden assessed by quality of life
Zeitfenster: QoL will be measured at baseline and at 12 months of follow up evaluating the improvement of QoL within one year.

Symptom Burden, detected by Patient Questionnaires: Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life (AFEQT) and MOCA.

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is used as screening instrument for cognitive dysfunction.

The AFEQT questionnaire is used because it is specific to AF and validated in that subject population. From each AFEQT questionnaire, a single score will be calculated in line with AFEQT scoring guidelines and post-procedure values will be compared between the randomized arms.

QoL will be measured at baseline and at 12 months of follow up evaluating the improvement of QoL within one year.
Procedure-related complications
Zeitfenster: up to 12 months follow-up
Procedure-related complications, including phrenic nerve injury, pulmonary vein stenosis, esophageal injury and stroke.
up to 12 months follow-up
HF Progression Markers
Zeitfenster: up to 12 months follow-up
Progression of heart failure defined as trend in LV-EF and trend in BNP
up to 12 months follow-up

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Arian Sultan, MD, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg
  • Hauptermittler: Stephan Willems, MD, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

19. August 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

31. März 2030

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

31. März 2031

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

20. Mai 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

27. Mai 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

2. Juni 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

24. August 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

21. August 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. August 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • #4523 - PULSE Study

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren