Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

PULSed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Using a Balloon for Early Intervention - Study (PULSE)

21 de agosto de 2026 atualizado por: Asklepios proresearch

PULSed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Using a Balloon for Early Intervention - Study - The "PULSE - Study"

This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point, controlled clinical trial to investigate the impact of first line pulsed field ablation during 12 months follow-up in patients with early-stage paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (<3 years) compared to usual care, defined as OMT.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Recrutamento

Condições

Descrição detalhada

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a progressive arrhythmia associated with significant morbidity and mortality and burden for our health care system. Early rhythm-control therapy was beneficial regarding cardiovascular outcomes in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic AF. Recent studies introducing first line Cryo Balloon based catheter ablation EARLY-AF and STOP -AF provided strong evidence supporting early catheter ablation over pharmacologic rhythm control in the paroxysmal setting of AF. Ongoing studies are challenging the current concept investigating the expansion of early rhythm control also to all types of clinically diagnosed AF using cryo ablation. With the advent of pulsed field ablation (PFA), a third energy source-alongside cryothermal and radiofrequency (RF) ablation-has been established for the effective treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). PFA induces so-called irreversible electroporation, thereby enabling successful ablation of myocardial tissue. Different cell types exhibit varying susceptibility and threshold levels for irreversible electroporation when exposed to PFA. Carefully tailored PFA pulse trains deliver sufficient energy to induce irreversible electroporation while avoiding excessive thermal effects on the surrounding tissue. Consequently, PFA enables selective targeting of myocardial tissue while minimizing collateral injury. This characteristic may translate into improved safety and efficacy in the treatment of AF. In contrast, thermal ablation techniques such as cryoablation and RF ablation inherently rely on substantial temperature changes, either cooling or heating, which may adversely affect adjacent anatomical structures including nerves (e.g., resulting in phrenic nerve palsy), vascular structures, and extracardiac tissues such as the esophagus. The occurrence of these potentially life-threatening complications may be reduced or possibly avoided using PFA. Over recent years, various PFA catheter designs as well as different PFA energy delivery settings have been introduced to enable effective and safe pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). A broad spectrum of catheter configurations-including focal single-tip catheters, pentaspline multielectrode systems, and balloon-based technologies-has been incorporated into clinical practice. Substantial comparative data evaluating PFA against conventional thermal ablation modalities (cryoablation and RF ablation) are now available. To date, no significant differences in acute procedural success rates, procedural parameters, or clinical outcome measures have been consistently observed, although one randomized trial demonstrated a trend toward improved outcomes with PFA. Across these studies, procedure duration was significantly shorter with PFA compared with conventional thermal ablation, representing an additional potential advantage of this treatment modality. More recent studies suggest that catheter ablation-particularly PFA-based ablation-for AF patients without documented recurrence during follow-up may be associated with a reduction in overall ischemic stroke events. These findings indicate that catheter ablation of AF may confer additional benefits in preventing adverse cardiovascular outcomes compared with medical therapy alone. Even in cases of AF recurrence, catheter ablation has been shown not only to significantly reduce AF burden but also to slow the progression from paroxysmal to persistent AF, the latter generally being associated with less favorable clinical outcomes compared with ablation performed during earlier disease stages. Despite the availability of effective antiarrhythmic drug therapy for AF, long-term pharmacological treatment is frequently limited by intolerance, side effects, or insufficient efficacy in a substantial proportion of patients. Nevertheless, large, randomized trials directly comparing PFA-based AF ablation with optimized medical therapy remain scarce.

Therefore, the PULSE study aims to evaluate the impact of PFA using a balloon-based catheter system for the treatment of AF on the maintenance of sinus rhythm compared with optimized medical therapy. In addition, the study will assess AF disease progression in patients with early-stage atrial fibrillation, including both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals with paroxysmal or early persistent AF.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

264

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Estude backup de contato

Locais de estudo

      • Bad Oeynhausen, Alemanha
        • Ainda não está recrutando
        • HZD Bad Oeynhausen
        • Contato:
          • Philipp Sommer, MD
      • Cologne, Alemanha
        • Ainda não está recrutando
        • Uniklinik Köln
        • Contato:
          • Daniel Steven, MD
      • Düsseldorf, Alemanha
        • Ainda não está recrutando
        • Uniklinik Düsseldorf
        • Contato:
          • Obaida Rana, MD
      • Frankfurt, Alemanha
        • Ainda não está recrutando
        • CCB Frankfurt
        • Contato:
          • Melanie Gunawardene, MD
      • Giessen, Alemanha
        • Ainda não está recrutando
        • Uniklinik Gießen
        • Contato:
          • Borislav Dinov, MD
      • Hamburg, Alemanha, 20099
        • Recrutamento
        • Arian Sultan
        • Contato:
      • Herne, Alemanha
        • Ainda não está recrutando
        • Marien Hospital Herne
        • Contato:
          • Christian Ukena, MD
      • Leipzig, Alemanha
        • Ainda não está recrutando
        • Leipzig Herzzentrum HZL
        • Contato:
          • Kerstin Bode, MD
      • Neuss, Alemanha
        • Ainda não está recrutando
        • Lukas Krankenhaus Neuss
        • Contato:
          • Torsten Becker, MD
      • Nuremberg, Alemanha
        • Ainda não está recrutando
        • Klinikum Nürnberg
        • Contato:
          • Thomas Deneke, MD

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (≥18 years) with symptomatic or asymptomatic, paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation
  • First diagnosis of AF within the last 36 months
  • At least one documented episode of AF on ECG, Holter monitoring, or eligible Smart Watch Device
  • No prior catheter ablation for AF

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Persistent AF >3 years or longstanding persistent AF
  • Previous AF-Ablation
  • Ongoing continuous AAD therapy with Amiodarone at baseline
  • History of failed continuous AAD therapy with > 1 agent. Exceptions are Beta blocker, Verapamil or "pill in the pocket"-therapy
  • Left Atrial Volume Index (LAVI) > 50mL/m2
  • Severe mitral regurgitation
  • Contraindications to anticoagulation therapy
  • Severe pulmonary or renal disease
  • Pregnancy, active cancer disease
  • Any condition or disease which is contraindication for AF ablation within 21 days or Anti-Arrhythmic Drug (AAD)

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Solteiro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Comparador Ativo: Group1: Pulsed Field-Ablation
Patients randomized in the intervention group should receive the PFA ablation within 21 days.
PFA (Pulse Field Ablation) - Pulmonary vein isolation ablation for atrial fibrillation
Sem intervenção: Group 2: Usual care
Patients randomized in the control group / usual care group will undergo optimal medical treatment (OMT), defined as antiarrhythmic drug therapy (AAD). Within 21 days patients in the control group should start or maintain on AAD therapy based on decision of the investigator and according to current ESC Guidelines.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Freedom from any Atrial Tachyarrhythmia
Prazo: through 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up
Arrhythmia-free survival, defined as freedom from atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting >30 seconds through 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up on ILR monitoring via blinded core lab or any 12 lead ECG on visits, ECG Holter monitoring, or on symptom driven event monitoring after a 8 week Blanking period (reviewed by a blinded endpoint review committee).
through 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
AF Burden
Prazo: through 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up
Freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) (>30 s) through 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up
through 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up
Burden of Atrial Tachycardia and Atrial Flutter
Prazo: through 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up
Freedom from atrial tachycardia and atrial flutter (AFL) (>30 s) through 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up
through 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up
Re-hospitalization rate
Prazo: up to 12 months follow-up
Re-hospitalization rate due to cardiovascular disease (e.g. AF, worsening of heart failure)
up to 12 months follow-up
AF Progression Timeline
Prazo: through 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up
Progression from paroxysmal to persistent AF trough 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up.
through 9 weeks to 12 months follow-up
Symptom Burden assessed by quality of life
Prazo: QoL will be measured at baseline and at 12 months of follow up evaluating the improvement of QoL within one year.

Symptom Burden, detected by Patient Questionnaires: Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life (AFEQT) and MOCA.

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is used as screening instrument for cognitive dysfunction.

The AFEQT questionnaire is used because it is specific to AF and validated in that subject population. From each AFEQT questionnaire, a single score will be calculated in line with AFEQT scoring guidelines and post-procedure values will be compared between the randomized arms.

QoL will be measured at baseline and at 12 months of follow up evaluating the improvement of QoL within one year.
Procedure-related complications
Prazo: up to 12 months follow-up
Procedure-related complications, including phrenic nerve injury, pulmonary vein stenosis, esophageal injury and stroke.
up to 12 months follow-up
HF Progression Markers
Prazo: up to 12 months follow-up
Progression of heart failure defined as trend in LV-EF and trend in BNP
up to 12 months follow-up

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Arian Sultan, MD, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg
  • Investigador principal: Stephan Willems, MD, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Publicações Gerais

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

19 de agosto de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

31 de março de 2030

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

31 de março de 2031

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

20 de maio de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

27 de maio de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

2 de junho de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

24 de agosto de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

21 de agosto de 2026

Última verificação

1 de agosto de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Palavras-chave

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • #4523 - PULSE Study

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever