Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Artificial Intelligence Versus Clinical Examination in White Spot Lesions Detection, Identification, And Scoring

8. Juni 2026 aktualisiert von: Mohamed Hisham Abd ElFattah Gabr Ali, Cairo University

Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Analysis Using Intraoral Photographs Versus Clinical Examination in White Spot Lesions Detection, Identification, And Scoring.

The goal of this observational study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Clinical examination as a standard for detection, identification and scoring of White Spot Lesions Versus Artificial intelligence analysis of intraoral photographs. The photographs are examined by experienced dental professionals to maintain diagnostic accuracy. Machine learning models YOLO and Mask-RCNN will analyze these images in three phases: pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical. A dataset of 329 labelled photographs, annotated by experts, is used to train these models. Data augmentation methods enhance model performance, and accuracy is assessed against clinical examination results to confirm reliability.

The main question it aims to answer is:

- Is artificial intelligence analysis of intraoral photographs as accurate as clinical assessment in the detection, identification, and scoring of white spot lesions among adult Egyptian patients attending Cairo University Dental Hospital?

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Dentists frequently encounter various dental hard tissue anomalies that present both diagnostic challenges and require careful treatment planning. A common example is white spot lesions or whitish discolorations of the teeth that can arise from multiple etiologies. These may be carious in nature, such as post-orthodontic incipient caries, or represent developmental defects like dental fluorosis or molar-incisor hypo-mineralization (MIH). Distinguishing between these conditions is essential for appropriate clinical management. The diagnosis of WSLs primarily relies on visual and photographic examination, which evaluates the morphology, size, color, and location of the lesions. Depth assessment is particularly critical, as it serves as a key determinant in selecting the most appropriate treatment approach. Detection and scoring of WSLs can be accomplished through clinical visual inspection alone or enhanced by adjunctive diagnostic technologies, including laser fluorescence, quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF), and electrical impedance spectroscopy.

The clinical characteristics of WSLs can vary considerably, making differential diagnosis challenging. While specialist clinicians demonstrate high validity and reliability in distinguishing between various white spot lesions, general dental practitioners exhibit lower diagnostic accuracy. Conventional diagnostic approaches for white spot lesions often lack precision and consistency. Visual assessment presents several inherent limitations, including the potential for misclassification due to overlapping clinical presentations among different etiologies. A systematic review and meta-analysis examining the efficacy of detection methods for incipient caries reported that photographic visual inspection achieved a sensitivity of only 67% and specificity of 79%, highlighting the need for more reliable diagnostic approaches.

Recent advances in computing power, data accessibility, and processing capabilities have accelerated the development of artificial intelligence (AI) applications, transforming contemporary healthcare research. Dentistry has similarly benefited from this technological evolution, with AI demonstrating considerable potential across various clinical applications. Machine learning (ML), a subfield of AI, represents a powerful approach for computer-aided diagnostic support, with algorithms that identify patterns within datasets during training and apply this knowledge to make predictions on new data. Emerging evidence indicates that these AI advances can improve diagnostic accuracy in caries detection, thereby supporting clinicians in making more precise and reliable assessments. Dental photography, captured using devices such as DSLR cameras or intraoral cameras, serves as a valuable tool for diagnosis and treatment planning. When combined with intelligent image analysis methods, AI can automate the identification and assessment of diagnostic data from photographs, facilitating standalone diagnostic procedures that reduce subjectivity and enhance clinical decision-making. Deep CNNs can detect and distinguish entities of similar but not identical appearance when trained on sufficiently large image datasets. Employing such models as part of an integrated image-analysis software solution would enable rapid classification of existing photographic library data and improve the accuracy and reliability of clinicians' decision-making in treatment planning or referral. Emerging evidence from studies using intraoral photographs and AI algorithms demonstrates promising detection rates, with AI exhibiting high sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy, and reliability in diagnostic performance. AI-driven tools are designed to serve as supportive aids for clinicians, strengthening diagnostic accuracy, streamlining workflows, improving cost-efficiency, and enhancing patient care rather than replacing clinical expertise. Simplifying the diagnostic process for white spot lesions is essential to enable their timely detection at an early stage, facilitating prompt intervention and improving preventive outcomes. AI models must be validated using local data from diverse clinical settings, particularly in lower-middle-income countries, with their performance assessed through sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy measures and benchmarked against conventional diagnostic approaches. Therefore, it is crucial to develop and validate white spot lesion detection and classification models using data from Egyptian patients attending Cairo University Hospital to ensure accurate and clinically relevant results, emphasizing the potential improvements in accuracy and reliability that AI can bring to dental diagnostics.

Studientyp

Beobachtungs

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

329

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Probenahmeverfahren

Nicht-Wahrscheinlichkeitsprobe

Studienpopulation

Patients attending the Conservative Department of Cairo University Dental Clinic, aged from 20 to 60 years, presenting with white spot lesions of teeth, showing no signs or symptoms, demonstrating co-operation, and expressing interest in participating in the study will be considered eligible. Patients with orthodontic appliances or bridgework that could impact the clinical assessment process will be excluded.

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult patients aged 20 - 60 years
  2. Males or Females
  3. Patients with white spot lesions of teeth 4 - Co-operative patients with interest in participation in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with orthodontic appliances or bridgework that might interfere with evaluation and assessment
  2. Patients with no white spot lesions
  3. Patients with systematic diseases that might affect participation
  4. Patients refusing to sign the informed consent or not willing to be part of the study

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Zeitfenster
Artificial Intelligence diagnostic accuracy in White Spot Lesions Detection
Zeitfenster: Baseline
Baseline

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Studienleiter: Asmaa A. Mohamed Yassen, Professor of Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
  • Studienleiter: Rawda Hesham Abdelaziz, Associate Professor of Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
  • Studienleiter: Asmaa A. Elsayed Osman, Lecturer of Information Technology, Faculty of Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Cairo University

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

1. Juli 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Juli 2027

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. November 2027

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

2. Juni 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

8. Juni 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

10. Juni 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

10. Juni 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

8. Juni 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juni 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • AI in detecting dental caries

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

UNENTSCHIEDEN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Artificial Intelligence models (YOLO and MASK-RCNN)

Abonnieren