Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Artificial Intelligence Versus Clinical Examination in White Spot Lesions Detection, Identification, And Scoring

8 de junio de 2026 actualizado por: Mohamed Hisham Abd ElFattah Gabr Ali, Cairo University

Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Analysis Using Intraoral Photographs Versus Clinical Examination in White Spot Lesions Detection, Identification, And Scoring.

The goal of this observational study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Clinical examination as a standard for detection, identification and scoring of White Spot Lesions Versus Artificial intelligence analysis of intraoral photographs. The photographs are examined by experienced dental professionals to maintain diagnostic accuracy. Machine learning models YOLO and Mask-RCNN will analyze these images in three phases: pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical. A dataset of 329 labelled photographs, annotated by experts, is used to train these models. Data augmentation methods enhance model performance, and accuracy is assessed against clinical examination results to confirm reliability.

The main question it aims to answer is:

- Is artificial intelligence analysis of intraoral photographs as accurate as clinical assessment in the detection, identification, and scoring of white spot lesions among adult Egyptian patients attending Cairo University Dental Hospital?

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Aún no reclutando

Descripción detallada

Dentists frequently encounter various dental hard tissue anomalies that present both diagnostic challenges and require careful treatment planning. A common example is white spot lesions or whitish discolorations of the teeth that can arise from multiple etiologies. These may be carious in nature, such as post-orthodontic incipient caries, or represent developmental defects like dental fluorosis or molar-incisor hypo-mineralization (MIH). Distinguishing between these conditions is essential for appropriate clinical management. The diagnosis of WSLs primarily relies on visual and photographic examination, which evaluates the morphology, size, color, and location of the lesions. Depth assessment is particularly critical, as it serves as a key determinant in selecting the most appropriate treatment approach. Detection and scoring of WSLs can be accomplished through clinical visual inspection alone or enhanced by adjunctive diagnostic technologies, including laser fluorescence, quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF), and electrical impedance spectroscopy.

The clinical characteristics of WSLs can vary considerably, making differential diagnosis challenging. While specialist clinicians demonstrate high validity and reliability in distinguishing between various white spot lesions, general dental practitioners exhibit lower diagnostic accuracy. Conventional diagnostic approaches for white spot lesions often lack precision and consistency. Visual assessment presents several inherent limitations, including the potential for misclassification due to overlapping clinical presentations among different etiologies. A systematic review and meta-analysis examining the efficacy of detection methods for incipient caries reported that photographic visual inspection achieved a sensitivity of only 67% and specificity of 79%, highlighting the need for more reliable diagnostic approaches.

Recent advances in computing power, data accessibility, and processing capabilities have accelerated the development of artificial intelligence (AI) applications, transforming contemporary healthcare research. Dentistry has similarly benefited from this technological evolution, with AI demonstrating considerable potential across various clinical applications. Machine learning (ML), a subfield of AI, represents a powerful approach for computer-aided diagnostic support, with algorithms that identify patterns within datasets during training and apply this knowledge to make predictions on new data. Emerging evidence indicates that these AI advances can improve diagnostic accuracy in caries detection, thereby supporting clinicians in making more precise and reliable assessments. Dental photography, captured using devices such as DSLR cameras or intraoral cameras, serves as a valuable tool for diagnosis and treatment planning. When combined with intelligent image analysis methods, AI can automate the identification and assessment of diagnostic data from photographs, facilitating standalone diagnostic procedures that reduce subjectivity and enhance clinical decision-making. Deep CNNs can detect and distinguish entities of similar but not identical appearance when trained on sufficiently large image datasets. Employing such models as part of an integrated image-analysis software solution would enable rapid classification of existing photographic library data and improve the accuracy and reliability of clinicians' decision-making in treatment planning or referral. Emerging evidence from studies using intraoral photographs and AI algorithms demonstrates promising detection rates, with AI exhibiting high sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy, and reliability in diagnostic performance. AI-driven tools are designed to serve as supportive aids for clinicians, strengthening diagnostic accuracy, streamlining workflows, improving cost-efficiency, and enhancing patient care rather than replacing clinical expertise. Simplifying the diagnostic process for white spot lesions is essential to enable their timely detection at an early stage, facilitating prompt intervention and improving preventive outcomes. AI models must be validated using local data from diverse clinical settings, particularly in lower-middle-income countries, with their performance assessed through sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy measures and benchmarked against conventional diagnostic approaches. Therefore, it is crucial to develop and validate white spot lesion detection and classification models using data from Egyptian patients attending Cairo University Hospital to ensure accurate and clinically relevant results, emphasizing the potential improvements in accuracy and reliability that AI can bring to dental diagnostics.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Estimado)

329

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

Patients attending the Conservative Department of Cairo University Dental Clinic, aged from 20 to 60 years, presenting with white spot lesions of teeth, showing no signs or symptoms, demonstrating co-operation, and expressing interest in participating in the study will be considered eligible. Patients with orthodontic appliances or bridgework that could impact the clinical assessment process will be excluded.

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult patients aged 20 - 60 years
  2. Males or Females
  3. Patients with white spot lesions of teeth 4 - Co-operative patients with interest in participation in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with orthodontic appliances or bridgework that might interfere with evaluation and assessment
  2. Patients with no white spot lesions
  3. Patients with systematic diseases that might affect participation
  4. Patients refusing to sign the informed consent or not willing to be part of the study

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Periodo de tiempo
Artificial Intelligence diagnostic accuracy in White Spot Lesions Detection
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline
Baseline

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Director de estudio: Asmaa A. Mohamed Yassen, Professor of Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
  • Director de estudio: Rawda Hesham Abdelaziz, Associate Professor of Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
  • Director de estudio: Asmaa A. Elsayed Osman, Lecturer of Information Technology, Faculty of Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Cairo University

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de julio de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de julio de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de noviembre de 2027

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

2 de junio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

8 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

10 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

10 de junio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

8 de junio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de junio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • AI in detecting dental caries

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

INDECISO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Artificial Intelligence models (YOLO and MASK-RCNN)

Suscribir