Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Cyanoacrylate Glue Versus Absorbable Gelatin Sponge for Gastric Varices (CoAGS-GV)

9. Juli 2026 aktualisiert von: Sunil Gupta, Unity Health Toronto

Cyanoacrylate Glue Versus Absorbable Gelatin Sponge for Endoscopic Treatment of Gastric Varices (CoAGS-GV): A Randomized, Patient- and Assessor-Blinded, Non-Inferiority Trial

This study compares two endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatments for gastric varices, which are enlarged veins in the stomach that can bleed. Both treatments use small coils placed into the varix. One group will receive coils with cyanoacrylate medical glue, and the other group will receive coils with absorbable gelatin sponge.

The purpose of the study is to determine whether absorbable gelatin sponge with coils is not worse than cyanoacrylate glue with coils for closing off gastric varices, and to compare safety outcomes. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Participants and outcome assessors will not know which treatment was used, but the doctor performing the procedure will know.

After the procedure, participants will be followed for up to 12 months. Follow-up may include clinical assessments, questionnaires about health and quality of life, CT imaging shortly after the procedure, and repeat endoscopic ultrasound assessments to evaluate whether the gastric varix has been successfully treated.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Gastric varices are enlarged veins in the stomach that occur in patients with portal hypertension and can cause serious bleeding. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapy allows direct visualization of the target varix, placement of embolization coils, delivery of an embolic material, and Doppler assessment of blood flow after treatment.

Cyanoacrylate glue combined with coils is an established treatment approach for gastric varices. However, glue injection can be technically challenging and may be associated with complications such as embolization or equipment-related issues. Absorbable gelatin sponge, delivered as a slurry with coils, is an alternative approach that is used in clinical care and may avoid some of the practical limitations of glue. Comparative randomized data between these approaches are limited.

This is a randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded, non-inferiority trial comparing endoscopic ultrasound-guided coil embolization with cyanoacrylate glue versus endoscopic ultrasound-guided coil embolization with absorbable gelatin sponge for the treatment of gastric varices. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio after confirmation of eligibility and informed consent. Randomization will occur intra-procedurally before treatment.

Participants assigned to the cyanoacrylate group will undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided coil deployment followed by injection of cyanoacrylate glue mixed with Lipiodol. Participants assigned to the absorbable gelatin sponge group will undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided coil deployment followed by injection of absorbable gelatin sponge slurry. In both groups, Doppler assessment will be used to evaluate blood flow in the target varix after treatment. Repeat coil and/or embolic material injection may be performed at the discretion of the treating endoscopist.

Participants will be monitored after the procedure for complications, including bleeding and embolization. Follow-up includes CT imaging approximately 48 hours after the procedure, clinical and questionnaire-based follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and repeat endoscopic assessment with endoscopic ultrasound at approximately 3 months and 12 months. The primary endpoint is complete obliteration of the target gastric varix, assessed by absence of Doppler flow on follow-up endoscopic ultrasound at 3 months. Secondary and tertiary outcomes include immediate technical success, clinical success, rebleeding, adverse events, hospital admission, ICU admission, transfusion requirements, reintervention, length of stay, procedural technical difficulty, costs, and health-related quality of life.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

64

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung

Studienorte

  • Kanada
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Kanada, M5B 1W8
        • St. Michael's Hospital - Unity Health Toronto
        • Kontakt:
        • Kontakt:
        • Hauptermittler:
          • Sunil Gupta, MD, PhD

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Gastric varices deemed suitable for EUS-guided endoscopic treatment.
  • History of suspected gastric variceal bleeding or active gastric variceal bleeding, with treatment intended for secondary prophylaxis.
  • Ability to provide informed consent directly or through a substitute decision maker.
  • Willingness and ability to undergo clinical follow-up, EUS assessment, and CT imaging.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent directly or through a substitute decision maker.
  • No gastric varix present, or gastric varix too small or not amenable to combination therapy.
  • Contraindication to therapeutic EUS or endoscopy.
  • Contraindication to any study material used in the assigned treatment arm.
  • Contraindication to contrast-enhanced CT, if not clinically manageable.
  • Inability to complete planned follow-up.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Any clinical situation in which the treating endoscopist determines that randomization would be unsafe or inappropriate.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Doppelt

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Aktiver Komparator: Cyanoacrylate Glue + Lipiodol + Coil
Participants randomized to this arm will undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of the target gastric varix using coil deployment followed by injection of cyanoacrylate glue mixed with Lipiodol. Repeat coil and/or glue injection may be performed at the discretion of the treating endoscopist. Doppler assessment will be performed to assess eradication of flow in the treated gastric varix.
Verfahren: EUS-Guided Coil Embolization With Cyanoacrylate Glue and Lipiodol
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of a gastric varix using coil deployment followed by injection of cyanoacrylate glue mixed with Lipiodol under direct visualization. The injection is flushed with sterile water. Repeat coil and/or glue injection may be performed at the discretion of the treating endoscopist. Doppler assessment is performed to assess eradication of flow in the treated gastric varix.
Andere Namen:
  • Glue + Lipiodol + Coil; Cyanoacrylate Glue; Glubran2
Experimental: Absorbable Gelatin Sponge + Coil
Participants randomized to this arm will undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of the target gastric varix using coil deployment followed by injection of absorbable gelatin sponge slurry. Repeat coil and/or absorbable gelatin sponge injection may be performed at the discretion of the treating endoscopist. Doppler assessment will be performed to assess eradication of flow in the treated gastric varix.
Verfahren: EUS-Guided Coil Embolization With Absorbable Gelatin Sponge
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of a gastric varix using coil deployment followed by injection of absorbable gelatin sponge slurry under direct visualization. The slurry is flushed with sterile water. Repeat coil and/or absorbable gelatin sponge injection may be performed at the discretion of the treating endoscopist. Doppler assessment is performed to assess eradication of flow in the treated gastric varix.
Andere Namen:
  • Gelfoam + Coil; Absorbable Gelatin Sponge; Gelfoam Slurry

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Complete Obliteration of the Target Gastric Varix on EUS
Zeitfenster: 3 months post-intervention
Proportion of participants with complete obliteration of the target gastric varix, defined as cessation or absence of Doppler flow within the target varix on follow-up endoscopic ultrasound.
3 months post-intervention

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Immediate Technical Success
Zeitfenster: During index procedure
Successful EUS-guided deployment of coil and assigned embolic material into the gastric varix with cessation of Doppler flow at the end of the procedure.
During index procedure
Short-Term Clinical Success
Zeitfenster: Up to 3 months post-intervention
Cessation of bleeding if present at baseline and/or absence of recurrent gastric variceal bleeding after the intervention.
Up to 3 months post-intervention
Procedure-Related Adverse Events
Zeitfenster: From index procedure through 12 months
Rate and severity of procedure-related adverse events, categorized according to the ASGE Lexicon for endoscopic adverse events.
From index procedure through 12 months
Long-Term Technical Success
Zeitfenster: 12 months post-intervention
Complete obliteration of the treated gastric varix on repeat EUS, defined as absence of Doppler flow in the treated target varix.
12 months post-intervention
Long-Term Clinical Success
Zeitfenster: Up to 12 months post-intervention
Absence of recurrent gastric variceal bleeding and assessment of clinical durability after the intervention.
Up to 12 months post-intervention

Andere Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Transfusion Requirements
Zeitfenster: From index procedure through 12 months
Number of blood product transfusions required after the intervention.
From index procedure through 12 months
Rebleeding
Zeitfenster: From index procedure through 12 months
Occurrence of recurrent gastric variceal bleeding after the index intervention.
From index procedure through 12 months
Hospital Length of Stay
Zeitfenster: From index admission up to 30 days
Length of hospital stay associated with the index presentation and intervention.
From index admission up to 30 days
ICU Admission
Zeitfenster: From index procedure through 12 months
Occurrence of ICU admission after the intervention.
From index procedure through 12 months
Hospital Readmission
Zeitfenster: From index procedure through 12 months
Occurrence of hospital readmission after the index intervention.
From index procedure through 12 months
Reintervention for Gastric Varices
Zeitfenster: From index procedure through 12 months
Need for additional endoscopic, interventional radiology, surgical, or other therapy for gastric varices after the index intervention.
From index procedure through 12 months
Procedural Technical Difficulty
Zeitfenster: During index procedure
Operator-assessed technical difficulty, including procedure time, device use, and challenges encountered during the intervention.
During index procedure
Intervention Cost
Zeitfenster: During index procedure
Cost of the intervention, including use of coils and assigned embolic material.
During index procedure
Health-Related Quality of Life
Zeitfenster: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-intervention
Health-related quality of life assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire.
1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-intervention

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Unity Health Toronto

Mitarbeiter

University of Toronto

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Sunil Gupta, MD, PhD, Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

1. August 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. November 2027

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. August 2029

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

5. Juli 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

9. Juli 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

13. Juli 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

13. Juli 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

9. Juli 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • CoAGS-GV-UHT

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

JA

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in publications may be shared with qualified researchers upon reasonable request, subject to review and approval by the study investigators, Unity Health Toronto institutional requirements, applicable privacy legislation, and any required data sharing agreement. No information that directly identifies participants will be shared.

IPD-Sharing-Zeitrahmen

Beginning after publication of the main study results and available for up to 5 years after publication.

IPD-Sharing-Zugriffskriterien

Requests will be considered from qualified researchers with a methodologically sound proposal for purposes consistent with the informed consent and applicable ethics and privacy requirements. Access may require approval from the study investigators and/or institution and completion of a data sharing agreement.

Art der unterstützenden IPD-Freigabeinformationen

  • STUDIENPROTOKOLL
  • SAFT
  • ICF

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren