Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Cyanoacrylate Glue Versus Absorbable Gelatin Sponge for Gastric Varices (CoAGS-GV)

9 de julio de 2026 actualizado por: Sunil Gupta, Unity Health Toronto

Cyanoacrylate Glue Versus Absorbable Gelatin Sponge for Endoscopic Treatment of Gastric Varices (CoAGS-GV): A Randomized, Patient- and Assessor-Blinded, Non-Inferiority Trial

This study compares two endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatments for gastric varices, which are enlarged veins in the stomach that can bleed. Both treatments use small coils placed into the varix. One group will receive coils with cyanoacrylate medical glue, and the other group will receive coils with absorbable gelatin sponge.

The purpose of the study is to determine whether absorbable gelatin sponge with coils is not worse than cyanoacrylate glue with coils for closing off gastric varices, and to compare safety outcomes. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Participants and outcome assessors will not know which treatment was used, but the doctor performing the procedure will know.

After the procedure, participants will be followed for up to 12 months. Follow-up may include clinical assessments, questionnaires about health and quality of life, CT imaging shortly after the procedure, and repeat endoscopic ultrasound assessments to evaluate whether the gastric varix has been successfully treated.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Aún no reclutando

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

Gastric varices are enlarged veins in the stomach that occur in patients with portal hypertension and can cause serious bleeding. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapy allows direct visualization of the target varix, placement of embolization coils, delivery of an embolic material, and Doppler assessment of blood flow after treatment.

Cyanoacrylate glue combined with coils is an established treatment approach for gastric varices. However, glue injection can be technically challenging and may be associated with complications such as embolization or equipment-related issues. Absorbable gelatin sponge, delivered as a slurry with coils, is an alternative approach that is used in clinical care and may avoid some of the practical limitations of glue. Comparative randomized data between these approaches are limited.

This is a randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded, non-inferiority trial comparing endoscopic ultrasound-guided coil embolization with cyanoacrylate glue versus endoscopic ultrasound-guided coil embolization with absorbable gelatin sponge for the treatment of gastric varices. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio after confirmation of eligibility and informed consent. Randomization will occur intra-procedurally before treatment.

Participants assigned to the cyanoacrylate group will undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided coil deployment followed by injection of cyanoacrylate glue mixed with Lipiodol. Participants assigned to the absorbable gelatin sponge group will undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided coil deployment followed by injection of absorbable gelatin sponge slurry. In both groups, Doppler assessment will be used to evaluate blood flow in the target varix after treatment. Repeat coil and/or embolic material injection may be performed at the discretion of the treating endoscopist.

Participants will be monitored after the procedure for complications, including bleeding and embolization. Follow-up includes CT imaging approximately 48 hours after the procedure, clinical and questionnaire-based follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and repeat endoscopic assessment with endoscopic ultrasound at approximately 3 months and 12 months. The primary endpoint is complete obliteration of the target gastric varix, assessed by absence of Doppler flow on follow-up endoscopic ultrasound at 3 months. Secondary and tertiary outcomes include immediate technical success, clinical success, rebleeding, adverse events, hospital admission, ICU admission, transfusion requirements, reintervention, length of stay, procedural technical difficulty, costs, and health-related quality of life.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

64

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio

Ubicaciones de estudio

  • Canadá
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canadá, M5B 1W8
        • St. Michael's Hospital - Unity Health Toronto
        • Contacto:
        • Contacto:
        • Investigador principal:
          • Sunil Gupta, MD, PhD

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Gastric varices deemed suitable for EUS-guided endoscopic treatment.
  • History of suspected gastric variceal bleeding or active gastric variceal bleeding, with treatment intended for secondary prophylaxis.
  • Ability to provide informed consent directly or through a substitute decision maker.
  • Willingness and ability to undergo clinical follow-up, EUS assessment, and CT imaging.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent directly or through a substitute decision maker.
  • No gastric varix present, or gastric varix too small or not amenable to combination therapy.
  • Contraindication to therapeutic EUS or endoscopy.
  • Contraindication to any study material used in the assigned treatment arm.
  • Contraindication to contrast-enhanced CT, if not clinically manageable.
  • Inability to complete planned follow-up.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Any clinical situation in which the treating endoscopist determines that randomization would be unsafe or inappropriate.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Doble

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador activo: Cyanoacrylate Glue + Lipiodol + Coil
Participants randomized to this arm will undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of the target gastric varix using coil deployment followed by injection of cyanoacrylate glue mixed with Lipiodol. Repeat coil and/or glue injection may be performed at the discretion of the treating endoscopist. Doppler assessment will be performed to assess eradication of flow in the treated gastric varix.
Procedimiento: EUS-Guided Coil Embolization With Cyanoacrylate Glue and Lipiodol
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of a gastric varix using coil deployment followed by injection of cyanoacrylate glue mixed with Lipiodol under direct visualization. The injection is flushed with sterile water. Repeat coil and/or glue injection may be performed at the discretion of the treating endoscopist. Doppler assessment is performed to assess eradication of flow in the treated gastric varix.
Otros nombres:
  • Glue + Lipiodol + Coil; Cyanoacrylate Glue; Glubran2
Experimental: Absorbable Gelatin Sponge + Coil
Participants randomized to this arm will undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of the target gastric varix using coil deployment followed by injection of absorbable gelatin sponge slurry. Repeat coil and/or absorbable gelatin sponge injection may be performed at the discretion of the treating endoscopist. Doppler assessment will be performed to assess eradication of flow in the treated gastric varix.
Procedimiento: EUS-Guided Coil Embolization With Absorbable Gelatin Sponge
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of a gastric varix using coil deployment followed by injection of absorbable gelatin sponge slurry under direct visualization. The slurry is flushed with sterile water. Repeat coil and/or absorbable gelatin sponge injection may be performed at the discretion of the treating endoscopist. Doppler assessment is performed to assess eradication of flow in the treated gastric varix.
Otros nombres:
  • Gelfoam + Coil; Absorbable Gelatin Sponge; Gelfoam Slurry

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Complete Obliteration of the Target Gastric Varix on EUS
Periodo de tiempo: 3 months post-intervention
Proportion of participants with complete obliteration of the target gastric varix, defined as cessation or absence of Doppler flow within the target varix on follow-up endoscopic ultrasound.
3 months post-intervention

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Immediate Technical Success
Periodo de tiempo: During index procedure
Successful EUS-guided deployment of coil and assigned embolic material into the gastric varix with cessation of Doppler flow at the end of the procedure.
During index procedure
Short-Term Clinical Success
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 3 months post-intervention
Cessation of bleeding if present at baseline and/or absence of recurrent gastric variceal bleeding after the intervention.
Up to 3 months post-intervention
Procedure-Related Adverse Events
Periodo de tiempo: From index procedure through 12 months
Rate and severity of procedure-related adverse events, categorized according to the ASGE Lexicon for endoscopic adverse events.
From index procedure through 12 months
Long-Term Technical Success
Periodo de tiempo: 12 months post-intervention
Complete obliteration of the treated gastric varix on repeat EUS, defined as absence of Doppler flow in the treated target varix.
12 months post-intervention
Long-Term Clinical Success
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 12 months post-intervention
Absence of recurrent gastric variceal bleeding and assessment of clinical durability after the intervention.
Up to 12 months post-intervention

Otras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Transfusion Requirements
Periodo de tiempo: From index procedure through 12 months
Number of blood product transfusions required after the intervention.
From index procedure through 12 months
Rebleeding
Periodo de tiempo: From index procedure through 12 months
Occurrence of recurrent gastric variceal bleeding after the index intervention.
From index procedure through 12 months
Hospital Length of Stay
Periodo de tiempo: From index admission up to 30 days
Length of hospital stay associated with the index presentation and intervention.
From index admission up to 30 days
ICU Admission
Periodo de tiempo: From index procedure through 12 months
Occurrence of ICU admission after the intervention.
From index procedure through 12 months
Hospital Readmission
Periodo de tiempo: From index procedure through 12 months
Occurrence of hospital readmission after the index intervention.
From index procedure through 12 months
Reintervention for Gastric Varices
Periodo de tiempo: From index procedure through 12 months
Need for additional endoscopic, interventional radiology, surgical, or other therapy for gastric varices after the index intervention.
From index procedure through 12 months
Procedural Technical Difficulty
Periodo de tiempo: During index procedure
Operator-assessed technical difficulty, including procedure time, device use, and challenges encountered during the intervention.
During index procedure
Intervention Cost
Periodo de tiempo: During index procedure
Cost of the intervention, including use of coils and assigned embolic material.
During index procedure
Health-Related Quality of Life
Periodo de tiempo: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-intervention
Health-related quality of life assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire.
1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-intervention

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Unity Health Toronto

Colaboradores

University of Toronto

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Sunil Gupta, MD, PhD, Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de agosto de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de noviembre de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de agosto de 2029

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

5 de julio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

9 de julio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

13 de julio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

13 de julio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

9 de julio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de julio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Palabras clave

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • CoAGS-GV-UHT

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

SÍ

Descripción del plan IPD

De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in publications may be shared with qualified researchers upon reasonable request, subject to review and approval by the study investigators, Unity Health Toronto institutional requirements, applicable privacy legislation, and any required data sharing agreement. No information that directly identifies participants will be shared.

Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD

Beginning after publication of the main study results and available for up to 5 years after publication.

Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD

Requests will be considered from qualified researchers with a methodologically sound proposal for purposes consistent with the informed consent and applicable ethics and privacy requirements. Access may require approval from the study investigators and/or institution and completion of a data sharing agreement.

Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
  • SAVIA
  • CIF

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir