Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Digital Intraosseous Anesthesia in MIH-Affected Permanent Molars (DIA-MIH)

26. Juli 2026 aktualisiert von: Alp Abidin Ateşçi, Ege University

Digital Intraosseous Anesthesia in MIH-Affected Permanent Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial

This multicentre, randomized clinical trial compared digital intraosseous anaesthesia with conventional local anaesthetic techniques in children aged 6-12 years receiving restorative treatment for MIH-affected permanent first molars. Within the maxillary stratum, digital intraosseous anaesthesia was compared with conventional infiltration anaesthesia; within the mandibular stratum, it was compared with inferior alveolar nerve block. The primary outcome was child-reported pain during restorative treatment. Secondary outcomes included pain during needle penetration and anaesthetic solution delivery, observed pain-related behaviour, and change in dental anxiety.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Children with an MIH-affected permanent first molar requiring restorative treatment were randomized separately within the maxillary and mandibular strata. In the maxillary stratum, digital intraosseous anaesthesia was compared with conventional infiltration anaesthesia. In the mandibular stratum, digital intraosseous anaesthesia was compared with conventional inferior alveolar nerve block. Only one MIH-affected permanent first molar was included for each child.

Pain during needle penetration, anaesthetic solution delivery, and restorative treatment was assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. Pain-related behavioural responses were assessed using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale, and dental anxiety was assessed before and after local anaesthetic administration using the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

110

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

  • Türkei (türkiye)
      • Istanbul, Türkei (türkiye)
        • Istanbul Beykent University
      • Izmir, Türkei (türkiye), 35110
        • Ege university

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Kind

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children aged 6-12 years.
  • Confirmed diagnosis of molar-incisor hypomineralisation according to the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry diagnostic criteria.
  • Presence of an MIH-affected permanent first molar classified as Würzburg Category 1 or 2a and requiring either a direct resin composite restoration or a stainless steel crown.
  • Positive or definitely positive behaviour according to the Frankl Behaviour Rating Scale.
  • No known allergy to local anaesthetics.
  • No relevant systemic disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receipt of analgesic, anxiolytic, or sedative medication within 48 hours before the treatment appointment.
  • Previous experience with intraosseous anaesthesia.
  • Presence of an acute dentoalveolar infection at the planned treatment site.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Unterstützende Pflege
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Maxillary Digital Intraosseous Anaesthesia Group
Children in this arm received computer-controlled digital intraosseous anaesthesia using the SleeperOne 5 system before restorative treatment of one MIH-affected permanent first molar in the maxillary arch.
Gerät: SleeperOne 5 Computer-Controlled Intraosseous Anaesthesia System
Digital intraosseous anaesthesia was administered using the SleeperOne 5 computer-controlled system (Dental Hi Tec, Cholet, France). Initial mucosal anaesthesia was achieved using 0.1-0.2 mL of 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, followed by intraosseous administration of an additional 1 mL of the same anaesthetic solution at the device-controlled slow flow rate.
Aktiver Komparator: Conventional Maxillary Infiltration Anaesthesia Group
Children in this arm received conventional supraperiosteal infiltration anaesthesia in the buccal sulcus adjacent to one MIH-affected maxillary permanent first molar before restorative treatment.
Verfahren: Conventional Maxillary Infiltration Anaesthesia
Supraperiosteal infiltration anaesthesia was performed using a standard aspirating dental syringe and a 27-gauge short needle. One millilitre of 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine was deposited slowly into the buccal sulcus adjacent to the MIH-affected maxillary permanent first molar.
Aktiver Komparator: Conventional Mandibular Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Group
Children in this arm received conventional inferior alveolar nerve block anaesthesia before restorative treatment of one MIH-affected mandibular permanent first molar.
Verfahren: Conventional Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Anaesthesia
Inferior alveolar nerve block anaesthesia was administered using a standard aspirating dental syringe and a 27-gauge long needle. One millilitre of 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine was deposited slowly. Adequate anaesthesia was confirmed by patient-reported lip numbness before restorative treatment was started.
Experimental: Mandibular Digital Intraosseous Anesthesia Group
Children in this arm received computer-controlled digital intraosseous anaesthesia using the SleeperOne 5 system before restorative treatment of one MIH-affected permanent first molar in the mandibular arch.
Gerät: SleeperOne 5 Computer-Controlled Intraosseous Anaesthesia System
Digital intraosseous anaesthesia was administered using the SleeperOne 5 computer-controlled system (Dental Hi Tec, Cholet, France). Initial mucosal anaesthesia was achieved using 0.1-0.2 mL of 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, followed by intraosseous administration of an additional 1 mL of the same anaesthetic solution at the device-controlled slow flow rate.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Child-Reported Pain During Dental Treatment Assessed Using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale
Zeitfenster: During the restorative procedure after local anesthesia administration, within the single treatment visit
Children rated the pain experienced during the restorative procedure using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. The scale comprises six faces scored 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
During the restorative procedure after local anesthesia administration, within the single treatment visit

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Child-Reported Pain During Needle Penetration Assessed Using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale
Zeitfenster: At the time of needle insertion into the oral mucosa, immediately before delivery of the local anaesthetic solution, during the single treatment visit
Children rated the pain experienced during needle penetration using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. The scale comprises six faces scored 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
At the time of needle insertion into the oral mucosa, immediately before delivery of the local anaesthetic solution, during the single treatment visit
Child-Reported Pain During Local Anaesthetic Solution Delivery Assessed Using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale
Zeitfenster: During delivery of the local anaesthetic solution, immediately after needle penetration, during the single treatment visit
Children rated the pain experienced during delivery of the local anaesthetic solution using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. The scale comprises six faces scored 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
During delivery of the local anaesthetic solution, immediately after needle penetration, during the single treatment visit
Observer-Rated Pain-Related Behaviour During Local Anaesthetic Administration Assessed Using the FLACC Scale
Zeitfenster: During the local anaesthetic injection sequence, from needle penetration through completion of anaesthetic solution delivery, before commencement of the restorative procedure, during the single treatment visit
Pain-related behaviour was independently assessed using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale. Each of the five components is scored from 0 to 2, producing a total score ranging from 0 to 10. A total score of 0 indicates a relaxed and comfortable child, 1-3 indicates mild discomfort, 4-6 indicates moderate pain, and 7-10 indicates severe pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain-related behavioural responses.
During the local anaesthetic injection sequence, from needle penetration through completion of anaesthetic solution delivery, before commencement of the restorative procedure, during the single treatment visit
Change in Dental Anxiety From Before to After Local Anaesthetic Administration Assessed Using the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale
Zeitfenster: Immediately before and immediately after local anaesthetic administration, during the single treatment visit
Dental anxiety was assessed using the eight-item Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale (MCDAS). Each item is scored from 1 (relaxed) to 5 (extremely anxious), producing a total score ranging from 8 to 40. Higher total scores indicate greater dental anxiety. Change was calculated as the post-anaesthesia score minus the pre-anaesthesia score; negative values indicate a reduction in dental anxiety.
Immediately before and immediately after local anaesthetic administration, during the single treatment visit

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Ege University

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Alp Abidin Atesci, PhD, Istanbul Beykent University

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

20. Dezember 2024

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

15. April 2026

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

15. April 2026

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

26. Juli 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

26. Juli 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

30. Juli 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

30. Juli 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

26. Juli 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • MIH-DIA-RCT-2026
  • 24-11/83 (Andere Kennung: Ege University Ethics Committee)

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Individual participant data will not be shared. Study findings will be reported only in aggregate form to protect participant privacy, as the study involves children and no external IPD-sharing plan was established in the study protocol.

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren