- ICH GCP
- US-Register für klinische Studien
- Klinische Studie NCT07785440
Development and Pilot Implementation of a Shared Decision-Making Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes Using the Ottawa Framework
23. August 2026 aktualisiert von: Chen Lili, Anhui Medical University
Construction and Preliminary Application of a Shared Decision-Making Intervention Program for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a shared decision-making (SDM) intervention program based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework in adult patients with type 2 diabetes (aged ≥18 years, without severe complications). The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does the intervention improve patients' decisional self-efficacy compared to usual care?
- Does the intervention enhance patients' actual participation in treatment decision-making?
- Does the intervention reduce diabetes-related distress?
- Does the intervention improve diabetes self-management behaviors? Researchers will compare the intervention group (receiving the SDM intervention plus usual care) with the control group (receiving usual care only) to see if the intervention leads to significantly better outcomes in decision self-efficacy, decision participation, diabetes distress, and self-management.
Participants will:
- Receive a Question Prompt List (QPL) handbook and be guided by a nurse to mark their most concerning questions.
- Attend face-to-face educational sessions covering disease basics, medication comparisons, lifestyle adjustments, and complication prevention.
- Engage in shared decision-making discussions with physicians, nurses, and family members to co-develop a personalized treatment plan.
- Complete follow-up assessments at 4 weeks and 6 weeks after discharge via telephone or outpatient visit, including questionnaires on decision participation, self-efficacy, satisfaction, diabetes distress, and self-management behaviors.
Studienübersicht
Status
Noch keine Rekrutierung
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Studientyp
Interventionell
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
70
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.
Studienkontakt
- Name: Lili Chen
- Telefonnummer: +86 13045512663
- E-Mail: chen20180524@163.com
Teilnahmekriterien
Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Erwachsene
- Älterer Erwachsener
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Nein
Beschreibung
Inclusion criteria:
- Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus according to the diagnostic criteria established by the Chinese Diabetes Society.
- Aged 18 years or older.
- Conscious, able to communicate normally, and capable of reading and completing questionnaires independently or with assistance.
- Informed consent obtained and voluntary participation.
Exclusion criteria:
- Complicated with severe acute or chronic complications of diabetes (e.g., diabetic ketoacidosis, severe diabetic nephropathy, proliferative retinopathy, etc.).
- Complicated with severe heart, liver, kidney, or other organ dysfunction, or malignant tumors.
- With cognitive impairment, mental disorders, or communication disorders.
- Currently participating in other interventional clinical studies.
Studienplan
Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Unterstützende Pflege
- Zuteilung: Nicht randomisiert
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Verdreifachen
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Kein Eingriff: Kontrollgruppe
|
|
|
Sonstiges: Interventionsgruppe
|
This intervention is a shared decision-making (SDM) program for adults with type 2 diabetes, guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework.
It consists of three phases: (1) Assess decision needs - build trust, introduce SDM, distribute a Question Prompt List (QPL) handbook, and let patients mark their top concerns; also collect baseline data using validated scales.
(2) Provide decision support - doctors explain current status and treatment options; nurses give education on diet, exercise, medication, and complications; then together with family, patients make a personalized treatment plan.
(3) Evaluate outcomes - before discharge, confirm skills and address remaining doubts; follow up at weeks 4 and 6 via phone/clinic to reassess decision self-efficacy, participation, diabetes distress, self-management, and glycemic control.
The control group receives usual care only.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Actual participation in treatment decision-making
Zeitfenster: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
Measured by the Control Preferences Scale (CPS) , originally developed by Lauri et al. and translated into Chinese by Ma Lili (2004).
The scale consists of two parts: attitude toward participation in treatment decision-making and actual participation in treatment decision-making.
This study uses the part measuring actual participation.
The Chinese version has a content validity index of 0.890 and a Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.851 for the actual participation subscale.
The 12 items reflect the shared decision-making process: items 1, 6, 7, 8, 9 assess weighing pros and cons; item 5 assesses providing information; items 2, 3, 4 assess expressing preferences; items 10, 11, 12 assess final decision-making.
Scoring details follow the standard CPS protocol.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Diabetes-related distress
Zeitfenster: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks.
|
Diabetes-related distress measured by the Chinese version of the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS), translated and revised by Yang Qing et al. (2010).
The scale contains 17 items across 4 dimensions: emotional burden (5 items: 1,3,8,11,14), physician-related distress (4 items: 2,4,9,15), regimen-related distress (5 items: 5,6,10,12,16), and interpersonal distress (3 items: 7,13,17).
Each item uses a 6-point Likert scale (1=no problem, 6=very serious problem).
Scoring criteria: mean dimension/item score <2 = no distress, 2-3 = moderate distress, >3 = severe distress.
Cronbach's α=0.9515.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks.
|
|
Diabetes self-management behaviors
Zeitfenster: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks.
|
Diabetes self-management behaviors measured by the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) scale developed by Toobert et al., Chinese version translated by Sun Shengnan et al.
The scale contains 13 items across 6 dimensions: general diet (4 items), exercise (2 items), blood glucose monitoring (2 items), foot care (2 items), medication adherence (2 items), and smoking status (1 item).
Total score is the sum of all dimension scores, with higher scores indicating better self-management behaviors.
Cronbach's α for each dimension ranges from 0.62 to 0.92.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks.
|
|
Glycemic control
Zeitfenster: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks.
|
Glycemic control assessed by two complementary indicators: (1) Fasting blood glucose (FBG, mmol/L) - venous blood samples collected after an 8-hour overnight fast, analyzed using the glucose oxidase method, reflecting short-term glycemic status; (2) Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c, %) - venous blood samples analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), reflecting average blood glucose levels over the preceding 2-3 months.
Lower values of both indicators indicate better glycemic control.
According to Chinese Diabetes Society guidelines, target FBG is 4.4-7.0
mmol/L and target HbA1c is <7.0% for most non-pregnant adults with type 2 diabetes.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks.
|
|
Satisfaction with decision-making
Zeitfenster: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks.
|
Decision-making satisfaction measured by the Satisfaction with Decision (SWD) scale adapted by Xu Xiaolin (2010).
The scale contains 4 dimensions: information, communication and negotiation, decision-making, satisfaction and confidence.
It demonstrates good reliability and validity, with a Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.899.
Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with medical decision-making participation.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks.
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.
Sponsor
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)
27. August 2026
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
20. September 2026
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
31. Oktober 2026
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
20. August 2026
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
23. August 2026
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
25. August 2026
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
25. August 2026
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
23. August 2026
Zuletzt verifiziert
1. August 2026
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- 81250921
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
NEIN
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Nein
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Nein
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .