Development and Pilot Implementation of a Shared Decision-Making Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes Using the Ottawa Framework
23 de agosto de 2026 actualizado por: Chen Lili, Anhui Medical University
Construction and Preliminary Application of a Shared Decision-Making Intervention Program for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a shared decision-making (SDM) intervention program based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework in adult patients with type 2 diabetes (aged ≥18 years, without severe complications). The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does the intervention improve patients' decisional self-efficacy compared to usual care?
- Does the intervention enhance patients' actual participation in treatment decision-making?
- Does the intervention reduce diabetes-related distress?
- Does the intervention improve diabetes self-management behaviors? Researchers will compare the intervention group (receiving the SDM intervention plus usual care) with the control group (receiving usual care only) to see if the intervention leads to significantly better outcomes in decision self-efficacy, decision participation, diabetes distress, and self-management.
Participants will:
- Receive a Question Prompt List (QPL) handbook and be guided by a nurse to mark their most concerning questions.
- Attend face-to-face educational sessions covering disease basics, medication comparisons, lifestyle adjustments, and complication prevention.
- Engage in shared decision-making discussions with physicians, nurses, and family members to co-develop a personalized treatment plan.
- Complete follow-up assessments at 4 weeks and 6 weeks after discharge via telephone or outpatient visit, including questionnaires on decision participation, self-efficacy, satisfaction, diabetes distress, and self-management behaviors.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Aún no reclutando
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Tipo de estudio
Intervencionista
Inscripción (Estimado)
70
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.
Estudio Contacto
- Nombre: Lili Chen
- Número de teléfono: +86 13045512663
- Correo electrónico: chen20180524@163.com
Criterios de participación
Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Adulto
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
No
Descripción
Inclusion criteria:
- Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus according to the diagnostic criteria established by the Chinese Diabetes Society.
- Aged 18 years or older.
- Conscious, able to communicate normally, and capable of reading and completing questionnaires independently or with assistance.
- Informed consent obtained and voluntary participation.
Exclusion criteria:
- Complicated with severe acute or chronic complications of diabetes (e.g., diabetic ketoacidosis, severe diabetic nephropathy, proliferative retinopathy, etc.).
- Complicated with severe heart, liver, kidney, or other organ dysfunction, or malignant tumors.
- With cognitive impairment, mental disorders, or communication disorders.
- Currently participating in other interventional clinical studies.
Plan de estudios
Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Cuidados de apoyo
- Asignación: No aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Triple
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Sin intervención: Grupo de control
|
|
|
Otro: Grupo de intervención
|
This intervention is a shared decision-making (SDM) program for adults with type 2 diabetes, guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework.
It consists of three phases: (1) Assess decision needs - build trust, introduce SDM, distribute a Question Prompt List (QPL) handbook, and let patients mark their top concerns; also collect baseline data using validated scales.
(2) Provide decision support - doctors explain current status and treatment options; nurses give education on diet, exercise, medication, and complications; then together with family, patients make a personalized treatment plan.
(3) Evaluate outcomes - before discharge, confirm skills and address remaining doubts; follow up at weeks 4 and 6 via phone/clinic to reassess decision self-efficacy, participation, diabetes distress, self-management, and glycemic control.
The control group receives usual care only.
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Actual participation in treatment decision-making
Periodo de tiempo: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
Measured by the Control Preferences Scale (CPS) , originally developed by Lauri et al. and translated into Chinese by Ma Lili (2004).
The scale consists of two parts: attitude toward participation in treatment decision-making and actual participation in treatment decision-making.
This study uses the part measuring actual participation.
The Chinese version has a content validity index of 0.890 and a Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.851 for the actual participation subscale.
The 12 items reflect the shared decision-making process: items 1, 6, 7, 8, 9 assess weighing pros and cons; item 5 assesses providing information; items 2, 3, 4 assess expressing preferences; items 10, 11, 12 assess final decision-making.
Scoring details follow the standard CPS protocol.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Diabetes-related distress
Periodo de tiempo: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks.
|
Diabetes-related distress measured by the Chinese version of the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS), translated and revised by Yang Qing et al. (2010).
The scale contains 17 items across 4 dimensions: emotional burden (5 items: 1,3,8,11,14), physician-related distress (4 items: 2,4,9,15), regimen-related distress (5 items: 5,6,10,12,16), and interpersonal distress (3 items: 7,13,17).
Each item uses a 6-point Likert scale (1=no problem, 6=very serious problem).
Scoring criteria: mean dimension/item score <2 = no distress, 2-3 = moderate distress, >3 = severe distress.
Cronbach's α=0.9515.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks.
|
|
Diabetes self-management behaviors
Periodo de tiempo: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks.
|
Diabetes self-management behaviors measured by the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) scale developed by Toobert et al., Chinese version translated by Sun Shengnan et al.
The scale contains 13 items across 6 dimensions: general diet (4 items), exercise (2 items), blood glucose monitoring (2 items), foot care (2 items), medication adherence (2 items), and smoking status (1 item).
Total score is the sum of all dimension scores, with higher scores indicating better self-management behaviors.
Cronbach's α for each dimension ranges from 0.62 to 0.92.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks.
|
|
Glycemic control
Periodo de tiempo: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks.
|
Glycemic control assessed by two complementary indicators: (1) Fasting blood glucose (FBG, mmol/L) - venous blood samples collected after an 8-hour overnight fast, analyzed using the glucose oxidase method, reflecting short-term glycemic status; (2) Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c, %) - venous blood samples analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), reflecting average blood glucose levels over the preceding 2-3 months.
Lower values of both indicators indicate better glycemic control.
According to Chinese Diabetes Society guidelines, target FBG is 4.4-7.0
mmol/L and target HbA1c is <7.0% for most non-pregnant adults with type 2 diabetes.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks.
|
|
Satisfaction with decision-making
Periodo de tiempo: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks.
|
Decision-making satisfaction measured by the Satisfaction with Decision (SWD) scale adapted by Xu Xiaolin (2010).
The scale contains 4 dimensions: information, communication and negotiation, decision-making, satisfaction and confidence.
It demonstrates good reliability and validity, with a Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.899.
Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with medical decision-making participation.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks.
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.
Patrocinador
Fechas de registro del estudio
Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Estimado)
27 de agosto de 2026
Finalización primaria (Estimado)
20 de septiembre de 2026
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
31 de octubre de 2026
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
20 de agosto de 2026
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
23 de agosto de 2026
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
25 de agosto de 2026
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
25 de agosto de 2026
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
23 de agosto de 2026
Última verificación
1 de agosto de 2026
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 81250921
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
NO
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .