- ICH GCP
- US-Register für klinische Studien
- Klinische Studie NCT07802054
Messages That Motivate: Communicating Alcohol-Related Breast Cancer Risk to Young Adult Women (MEMO)
Studienübersicht
Status
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienkontakt
- Name: The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
- Telefonnummer: 800-293-5066
- E-Mail: OSUCCCClinicaltrials@osumc.edu
Studienorte
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, Vereinigte Staaten, 43210
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
-
Hauptermittler:
- Darren Mays, MPH, PhD
-
Kontakt:
- Darren Mays, MPH, PhD
- Telefonnummer: 614-366-2953
- E-Mail: Darren.Mays@osumc.edu
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Erwachsene
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Assigned female at birth
- Age 18-25
- Report drinking alcohol at least once in the past 30 days
- Registered in the United States as a member of the Prolific consumer research platform
- Willing and able to complete procedures in English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Assigned male at birth
- Ages <18 or >25
- Do not report drinking alcohol at least once in the past 30 days
- Not registered in the U.S. as a member of the Prolific consumer research platform
- Not willing or not able to complete procedures
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Verhütung
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Arm 1: Risk Only + Industry Deception
|
Risk message content
Messages with information about alcohol industry deception
|
|
Experimental: Arm 2: Risk Only + YAW Susceptibility
|
Risk message content
Message content with information about why young adult women are susceptible to breast cancer risk from alcohol consumption
|
|
Experimental: Arm 3: Risk Only + Mechanisms
|
Risk message content
Message content with information about the mechanism by which alcohol contributes to increased breast cancer risk
|
|
Experimental: Arm 4: Efficacy Only + Industry Deception
|
Messages with information about alcohol industry deception
Efficacy Message Content
|
|
Experimental: Arm 5: Efficacy Only + YAW Susceptibility
|
Message content with information about why young adult women are susceptible to breast cancer risk from alcohol consumption
Efficacy Message Content
|
|
Experimental: Arm 6: Efficacy Only + Mechanisms
|
Message content with information about the mechanism by which alcohol contributes to increased breast cancer risk
Efficacy Message Content
|
|
Experimental: Arm 7: Risk and Efficacy + Industry Deception
|
Risk message content
Messages with information about alcohol industry deception
Efficacy Message Content
|
|
Experimental: Arm 8: Risk and Efficacy + YAW Susceptibility
|
Risk message content
Message content with information about why young adult women are susceptible to breast cancer risk from alcohol consumption
Efficacy Message Content
|
|
Experimental: Arm 9: Risk and Efficacy + Mechanisms
|
Risk message content
Message content with information about the mechanism by which alcohol contributes to increased breast cancer risk
Efficacy Message Content
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Message Perceptions
Zeitfenster: This assessment is administered immediately after participants view study messages on Day 1
|
We will assess message perceptions using a valid, reliable measure with six questions about whether participants thought the messages were worth remembering, grabbed their attention, and were informative, powerful, convincing, and meaningful. Responses are on a five-point Likert scale from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree). For all message response outcomes, we will sum and average responses to the items to create message-level scores, then compute means across both messages within each condition for a grand mean. Higher values are considered a better outcome. |
This assessment is administered immediately after participants view study messages on Day 1
|
|
Effect Perceptions
Zeitfenster: This assessment is administered immediately after participants view study messages on Day 1
|
We will capture message effects perceptions using the abbreviated effects perceptions scale.
Items include questions about how much the messages made them feel discouraged to drink alcohol, concerned about drinking alcohol, and made them feel that drinking alcohol is unpleasant on a scale from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree).
For all message response outcomes, we will sum and average responses to the items to create message-level scores, then compute means across both messages within each condition for a grand mean.
Higher values are considered a better outcome.
|
This assessment is administered immediately after participants view study messages on Day 1
|
|
Emotional Response
Zeitfenster: This assessment is administered immediately after participants view study messages on Day 1
|
We will capture emotional responses to the messages using a valid, four item scale.
Items are "This message made me angry; irritated; aggravated; and annoyed" with responses on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (Not likely at all) to 5 (Extremely likely).
For all message response outcomes, we will sum and average responses to the items to create message-level scores, then compute means across both messages within each condition for a grand mean.
Higher values are considered a better outcome.
|
This assessment is administered immediately after participants view study messages on Day 1
|
|
Counter-arguing
Zeitfenster: This assessment is administered immediately after participants view study messages on Day 1
|
We will capture counter-arguing, a measure of whether participants cognitively refute messages, with a valid, three item scale that captures whether participants criticize messages, think of points that go against messages, and are skeptical of the messages.
Responses are on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Not at all) to 7 (Very much).
For all message response outcomes, we will sum and average responses to the items to create message-level scores, then compute means across both messages within each condition for a grand mean.
Lower values are considered a better outcome.
|
This assessment is administered immediately after participants view study messages on Day 1
|
|
Behavioral Intentions
Zeitfenster: This assessment is administered immediately after participants view study messages on Day 1
|
Intentions to reduce alcohol consumption in the future will also be assessed with a valid, multi-item scale capturing whether participants will avoid drinking alcohol completely, reduce the number of occasions when they drink alcohol, and reduce the amount of alcohol they consume on drinking occasions with a 1 (Definitely Will Not) to 4 (Definitely Will) response scale.
For all message response outcomes, we will sum and average responses to the items to create message-level scores, then compute means across both messages within each condition for a grand mean.
Higher values are considered a better outcome.
|
This assessment is administered immediately after participants view study messages on Day 1
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Mitarbeiter
Ermittler
- Hauptermittler: Darren Mays, MPH, PhD, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- OSU-26048
- R01CA311193-01 (US NIH Stipendium/Vertrag)
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Beschreibung des IPD-Plans
IPD-Sharing-Zeitrahmen
IPD-Sharing-Zugriffskriterien
Art der unterstützenden IPD-Freigabeinformationen
- STUDIENPROTOKOLL
- SAFT
- ICF
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .