- ICH GCP
- US-Register für klinische Studien
- Klinische Studie NCT07812025
Comparing Outcomes of Labrum Preservation vs Excision in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
Labral Excision vs Preservation in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
This research is being done to determine whether removing or preserving the acetabular labrum, a ring of cartilage around the hip socket, during hip replacement surgery affects post-operative outcomes, operative time, or ease of placing the hip implant.
Both techniques (labrum removal and labrum preservation) are commonly performed by surgeons during total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, there is no definitive evidence showing whether one approach is better than the other. The goal of this study is to compare recovery and surgical factors between these two routinely used methods.
Studienübersicht
Status
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienorte
-
-
Georgia
-
Sandy Springs, Georgia, Vereinigte Staaten, 30328
- Total Joint Surgery Center Atlanta
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Erwachsene
- Älterer Erwachsener
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Indication for primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis (Tonnis grade ≥2 or surgeon's standard indication).
- Able to provide informed consent and complete PROMs in English (or validated local language instruments).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior ipsilateral hip replacement or resurfacing.
- Active infection or inflammatory arthritis where labral management is judged by the surgeon to be non-standard.
- Severe acetabular bone loss or deformity requiring custom implants or complex reconstruction (Crowe III/IV dysplasia).
- Planned simultaneous bilateral hip arthroplasty.
- Preoperative heterotopic ossification.
- Cognitive impairment preventing consent or completion of PROMs.
- Patients for whom the surgeon believes leaving the labrum would be unsafe (e.g., gross interposed soft tissue preventing any reasonable cup placement without removal)
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Behandlung
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Single
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Aktiver Komparator: Group A: Labrum Excision
This group has their labrum excised, with is the standard of care for THA.
|
The acetabular labrum will be removed during surgery, prior to final cup placement.
|
|
Experimental: Group B: Labrum Preservation
The experimental group to test recovery outcomes from preserving the labrum.
|
The acetabular labrum will be left in place during surgery unless it physically prevents proper implant seating, in which case it may be trimmed as necessary.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) Physical Component Score (PCS)
Zeitfenster: Baseline (preoperative), 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively
|
Change in physical health status measured by the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12), Physical Component Score.
Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical health status.
Compared between labrum excision and labrum preservation groups.
|
Baseline (preoperative), 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively
|
|
Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) Mental Component Score (MCS)
Zeitfenster: Baseline (preoperative), 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively
|
Change in mental health status measured by the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12), Mental Component Score.
Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better mental health status.
Compared between labrum excision and labrum preservation groups.
|
Baseline (preoperative), 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively
|
|
Procedure Satisfaction (5-Point Likert Scale)
Zeitfenster: 12 weeks postoperatively
|
Patient-reported satisfaction with the surgical procedure, assessed via a 5-point Likert scale at 12 weeks postoperatively.
Scores range from 1 (Very Dissatisfied) to 5 (Very Satisfied), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
Compared between labrum excision and labrum preservation groups.
|
12 weeks postoperatively
|
|
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Zeitfenster: Baseline (preoperative), 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively
|
Patient-reported pain intensity measured by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, an 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating worse (greater) pain.
Compared between labrum excision and labrum preservation groups.
|
Baseline (preoperative), 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively
|
|
HOOS, JR. (Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement)
Zeitfenster: Baseline (preoperative), 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively
|
Change in hip-specific patient-reported outcome measured by the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR.).
Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better hip function and less disability.
Compared between labrum excision and labrum preservation groups.
|
Baseline (preoperative), 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively
|
|
Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12)
Zeitfenster: Baseline (preoperative), 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively
|
Change in joint awareness during daily activities measured by the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12).
Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes (less awareness of the joint, i.e., the joint is more "forgotten").
Compared between labrum excision and labrum preservation groups.
|
Baseline (preoperative), 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively
|
|
Intraoperative Soft-Tissue/Labral Interference with Cup Position
Zeitfenster: Intraoperative (at time of surgery)
|
Surgeon-judged determination (yes/no) of whether soft tissue or the labrum interfered with acetabular cup positioning during the procedure, compared between groups.
|
Intraoperative (at time of surgery)
|
|
Protocol Deviation Rate (Labral Removal in Preservation Arm)
Zeitfenster: Intraoperative (at time of surgery)
|
Incidence of labral removal in patients randomized to the labrum preservation arm, performed per the predefined protocol deviation criteria when needed for safe cup or liner seating.
These cases remain in the intention-to-treat analysis and are also assessed in a per-protocol sensitivity analysis.
|
Intraoperative (at time of surgery)
|
|
Operative Time
Zeitfenster: Intraoperative (at time of surgery)
|
Total surgical time in minutes from skin incision to skin closure, recorded from the operative record and compared between labrum excision and labrum preservation groups.
|
Intraoperative (at time of surgery)
|
|
Total Fluoroscopy Time
Zeitfenster: Intraoperative (at time of surgery)
|
Total fluoroscopy time recorded during the surgical procedure, compared between labrum excision and labrum preservation groups.
|
Intraoperative (at time of surgery)
|
|
Incidence of Supplemental Acetabular Screw Use
Zeitfenster: Intraoperative (at time of surgery)
|
Proportion of patients requiring supplemental acetabular screws for component fixation, compared between labrum excision and labrum preservation groups.
|
Intraoperative (at time of surgery)
|
|
Estimated Blood Loss (EBL)
Zeitfenster: Intraoperative (at time of surgery)
|
Estimated intraoperative blood loss, compared between labrum excision and labrum preservation groups.
|
Intraoperative (at time of surgery)
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Iliopsoas Pain
Zeitfenster: Within 90 days postoperatively
|
Incidence of iliopsoas pain reported within 90 days after surgery, compared between labrum excision and labrum preservation groups.
|
Within 90 days postoperatively
|
|
Instability
Zeitfenster: 90 days and 1 year postoperatively
|
Incidence of postoperative hip instability, compared between labrum excision and labrum preservation groups.
|
90 days and 1 year postoperatively
|
|
Dislocation
Zeitfenster: 90 days and 1 year postoperatively
|
Incidence of postoperative hip dislocation, compared between labrum excision and labrum preservation groups.
|
90 days and 1 year postoperatively
|
|
Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI)
Zeitfenster: 90 days and 1 year postoperatively
|
Incidence of periprosthetic joint infection, compared between labrum excision and labrum preservation groups.
|
90 days and 1 year postoperatively
|
|
Reoperation
Zeitfenster: 90 days and 1 year postoperatively
|
Incidence of reoperation for any cause, compared between labrum excision and labrum preservation groups.
|
90 days and 1 year postoperatively
|
|
All-Cause Revision
Zeitfenster: 90 days and 1 year postoperatively
|
Incidence of revision surgery for any cause, compared between labrum excision and labrum preservation groups.
|
90 days and 1 year postoperatively
|
|
Wound Complications
Zeitfenster: 90 days and 1 year postoperatively
|
Incidence of postoperative wound complications, compared between labrum excision and labrum preservation groups.
|
90 days and 1 year postoperatively
|
|
Venous Thromboembolism (DVT/PE)
Zeitfenster: 90 days and 1 year postoperatively
|
Incidence of venous thromboembolism, including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, compared between labrum excision and labrum preservation groups.
|
90 days and 1 year postoperatively
|
|
Readmission
Zeitfenster: 90 days and 1 year postoperatively
|
Incidence of hospital readmission, compared between labrum excision and labrum preservation groups.
|
90 days and 1 year postoperatively
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- NSH1444
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .