Comparing Simulated Patients and Manikin Based Simulation in Obstetrics
Effect of Manikin and Simulated-Patient Realism on Training Experience and Performance in Emergency Team Training: A Mixed-Methods Research Programme: Substudy C - Simulated Patient vs. MamaAnne for PPH and Eclampsia Team Training
The aim of this randomized study is to compare a live, trained simulated patient with a high-fidelity manikin in obstetric emergency team training using two standardized scenarios. The participants in this study are intact clinical teams (e.g., obstetrics, anesthesiology, and nursing/midwifery staff routinely working together in obstetric emergencies) and are recruited as a unit. Each team will either have both scenarios with the live, trained standard patient or the high fidelity manikin. Both scenarios are standardized: One scenario is about post-partum hemorrhage (PPH), a severe bleeding after giving birth, and the other scenario is about eclampsia, an emergency in obstetrics that causes hypertensive crisis and seizures. The order of scenarios is random. After each scenario all team members fill out questionnaires about realism and cognitive stress. After the second debriefing, a focus group of approximately 15 minutes is conducted with each team with a standardized procedure and questions.
Studienübersicht
Status
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
The focus group is led by a moderator who did not facilitate either debriefing and who holds no supervisory relationship to any participant. A short semi-structured guide of five questions is used. The focus group is a separate element of the study and is not one of the two debriefings; it begins only once the second debriefing has been formally closed.
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienkontakt
- Name: Mathias Maleczek, PD Dr.
- Telefonnummer: +4314040041020
- E-Mail: mathias.maleczek@meduniwien.ac.at
Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung
- Name: Florian Berger, Dr.
- Telefonnummer: +4314040041020
- E-Mail: florian.berger@meduniwien.ac.at
Studienorte
-
-
State of Vienna
-
Vienna, State of Vienna, Österreich, 1090
- Medical University of Vienna
-
Kontakt:
- Mathias Maleczek, PD Dr.
- Telefonnummer: +4314040041020
- E-Mail: mathias.maleczek@meduniwien.ac.at
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Individual inclusion criteria are: physician, midwife, registered nurse, or paramedic; current clinical duties in obstetric or peripartum emergency care
- written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy
- Exclusion criteria are pregnancy and prior participation in a simulation study using the same obstetric scenarios.
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Sonstiges
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Aktiver Komparator: Trained Simulated Patient
Both scenarios portrayed by a trained Simulated Patient (PPH: verbalized pain/distress, simulated blood loss via MamaNatalie; eclampsia: seizure activity, verbal responses where clinically appropriate, hypertensive crisis presentation). |
Trained, standardized patient portraying obstetric woman with MamaNatalie simulator
Andere Namen:
|
|
Experimental: High-fidelity Manikin
Both scenarios portrayed by a high fidelity obstetric manikin (PPH: verbalized pain/distress, simulated blood loss via MamaAnne; eclampsia: seizure activity, verbal responses where clinically appropriate, hypertensive crisis presentation). |
Patient portrayed by high fidelity obstetric manikin MamaAnne |
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
SRS-Score
Zeitfenster: Immediately after each scenario (scenario 1 and scenario 2, on the day of training)
|
Perceived realism of the simulation measured with the Simulation Realism Scale (SRS), completed individually by every team member after each of the two scenarios. Score range [min] to [max]; higher scores indicate greater perceived realism. |
Immediately after each scenario (scenario 1 and scenario 2, on the day of training)
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Perceived realism on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Zeitfenster: Immediately after each scenario (scenario 1 and scenario 2, on the day of training)
|
Single-item perceived realism rated on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 (not realistic at all) to 10 (completely realistic); higher scores indicate greater perceived realism. Completed individually by every team member after each scenario. |
Immediately after each scenario (scenario 1 and scenario 2, on the day of training)
|
|
Themes on perceived realism and training experience (reflexive thematic analysis of focus groups)
Zeitfenster: Immediately after the debriefing of the second scenario, on the day of training
|
Debriefing and focus group transcripts are analyzed together using reflexive thematic analysis. Two researchers code independently; a codebook is developed after the first four teams and applied to the remainder, with discrepancies resolved in consensus discussion and a third researcher consulted where consensus is not reached. Coders are not blinded to modality, since modality is evident from the transcript; this is reported as a limitation. Analytic adequacy is judged against information power rather than data saturation, taking into account the narrow study aim, the high specificity of the sample, and the use of an established theoretical frame. |
Immediately after the debriefing of the second scenario, on the day of training
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
- Urogenitale Erkrankungen
- Pathologische Prozesse
- Weibliche Urogenitalerkrankungen und Schwangerschaftskomplikationen
- Geburtsbedingte Geburtskomplikationen
- Schwangerschaftskomplikationen
- Blutung
- Bluthochdruck, schwangerschaftsbedingt
- Puerperale Störungen
- Gebärmutterblutung
- Pathologische Zustände, Anzeichen und Symptome
- Eklampsie
- Postpartale Blutung
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- Fidelity C
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .